Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Internally-driven change and feature correspondence in object representation: A key to children's essentialism? Cover

Internally-driven change and feature correspondence in object representation: A key to children's essentialism?

Psychology of Language and Communication
Volume 14 (2010): Issue 2 (December 2010)
By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2010
References

References

  1. Ahn, W., Gelman, S. A., Amsterlaw, J. A., Hohenstein, J., & Kalish, C. W. 2000). Causal status effect in children's categorization., 76, B35-B43.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science., 21, 547-611.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Baillargeon, R. & Wang, S. (2002). Event categorization in infancy., 6, 85-93.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Bertenthal B. I. (1993). Perception of biomechanical motions by infants: intrinsic image and knowledge-based constraints. In C. Granrud (Ed.),(pp. 175-214). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Carey, S. (1985).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Gelman, R., Durgin, F., & Kaufman, L. (1995). Distinguishing between animates and inanimates: Not by motion alone. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. Premack (Eds.),(pp. 150-184). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Gelman, S. A. (1997). What does word use tell us about conceptual content?, 1 (2), 5-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Gelman, S. A. (2003).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., Rosengren, K., Hartman, E., & Pappas, T. (1998). Beyond labeling: The role of parental input in the acquisition of richly structured categories.Serial No. 253, Vol. 63, No. 1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991) Insides and essences: Early understandings of the nonobvious., 38, 213-244.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Gergely, G., Nádasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Bíró, S. (1995) Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age., 56, 165-193.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Hernik, M. & Haman, M. (2010, January). Fourteen-month-olds transfer sequences of features derived from internally-driven object transformation., Central European University, Budapest.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Haman, M. (2009, June). Internally-driven object transformation enhances essentialist categorization.Reims, France.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Inagaki, K. & Hatano, G. (2002).New York: Psychology Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Keil, F. C. (1989).Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Keil, F. C., Smith, W. C., Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Two dogmas of conceptual empiricism: Implications for hybrid models of the structure of knowledge,, 65, 103-135.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information., 24, 174-219.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence., 92, 289-316.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Newman, G. E., Herrmann P., Wynn K., & Keil F. C. (2008). Biases towards internal features in infants' reasoning about objects., 107, 420-432.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Opfer, J. E. & Siegler, R. S. (2004). Revisiting preschoolers living things concept: A microgenetic analysis of conceptual change in basic biology., 49, 301-332.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Piaget, J. (1929).New York: Harcourt.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Premack, D. & Premack A. J. (1995). Intention as psychological cause. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.),(pp. 185-199). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Rakison, D. H. (2005). Developing knowledge of objects' motion properties in infancy, 96, 183-214.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Simons, D. J. & Keil, F. C. (1995). An abstract to concrete shift in the development of biological thought: The insides story., 56, 129-163.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Scholl, B. J. & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy., 4, 299-309.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Scholl, B. J. (2007). Object Persistence in Philosophy and Psychology., 22, 563-591.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception., 14, 29-56.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Tarlowski, A. (2006). If it's an animal it has axons: Experience and culture in pre-school children's reasoning about animates., 21, 249-265.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Wang, S. & Baillargeon, R. (2007). Detecting impossible changes in infancy: A three-system account., 12, 17-23.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Woodward, A. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach., 69, 1-34.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-010-0007-4 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 13
Published on: Dec 22, 2010
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
object representation,
feature correlations,
change perception,
essentialism
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Psychology,
Applied psychology

© 2010 Maciej Haman, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 14 (2010): Issue 2 (December 2010)
Next article