Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The influence of sentential context and frequency of occurrence on the recognition of words with scrambled letters Cover

The influence of sentential context and frequency of occurrence on the recognition of words with scrambled letters

Open Access
|Nov 2009

References

  1. Coltheart, M. Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: a dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud., 108, 204-256.
  2. Fodor, J. A. (1983).Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  3. Gleason, J. B. & Ratner, N. B. (Ed.) (1998; Polish edition: 2005).Gdańsk: GWP.
  4. Gough, P. B., Alford, J. A., & Holley-Wilcox, P. (1981). Words and contexts. In O. J. L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.),(pp. 85-102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  5. Grainger, J. (1990). Word Frequency and Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Lexical Decision and Naming., 29, 228-244.
  6. Grainger, J. & Whitney, C. (2004) Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?,, 8, 58-59.
  7. Howes, D. H. & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401-410.
  8. Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification., 22, 517-560.
  9. McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings., 88, 375-405.
  10. Miller, G. A. (1951)New York: McGraw-Hill.
  11. Simpson, G. B., Peterson, R. R., Casteel, M. A., & Burgess, C. (1989). Lexical and sentence context effects in word recognition., 15, 88-97.
  12. Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects., 120-136.
  13. Tabossi, P. (1988). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts., 324-340.
  14. Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time., 17, 143-154.
  15. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: the SERIOL model and selective literature review., 221-243.
  16. Velan, H., & Frost, R (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on Reading English and Hebrew.(5), 913-918.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-009-0010-9 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 (formerly 1234-2238) | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 57
Published on: Nov 6, 2009
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2009 Wiktor Paciorek, Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.