Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of fuzzy AHP approach to selection of organizational structure with consideration to contextual dimensions Cover

Application of fuzzy AHP approach to selection of organizational structure with consideration to contextual dimensions

By: Alireza Aslani and  Feryal Aslani  
Open Access
|Oct 2012

References

  1. Adler, R.W. (2011). Performance management and organizational strategy: How to design systems that meet the needs of confrontation strategy firms, The British Accounting Review, 43(4), 251-263, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2011.08.00410.1016/j.bar.2011.08.004
  2. Al-Mashari, M. & Zairi, M. (1999). BPR implementation process: an analysis of key success and failure factors, Business Process Management Journal, 5(1), 87-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/1463715991024910810.1108/14637159910249108
  3. Aslani, A., Naaranoja, M. & Zakeri, B. (2012a). The prime criteria for private sector participation in renewable energy investment in the Middle East (case study: Iran). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4), 1977-1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.01510.1016/j.rser.2011.12.015
  4. Aslani, A., Helo, P. & Naaranoja, M. (2012b). Development of creativity in concurrent engineering teams, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2(3), 77-84, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2012.2301010.4236/ajibm.2012.23010
  5. Azar, A. (2008). Fuzzy Management Science [in Persian]. Tehran: IMPSC.
  6. Bafandeh, A. (2009). Developing a fuzzy expert system in order to design the organizational structure [in Persian], Beyond the Management, 9(2), 103-128.
  7. Bennett, R. & Savani, S. (2004). Managing conflict between marketing and other functions within charitable organizations, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(2), 180 - 200, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/143773041052184010.1108/1437730410521840
  8. Cernancky, M., Makula, M. & Benuskova, L. (2007). Organization of the state space of a simple recurrent network before and after training on recursive linguistic structures, Neural Networks, 20(2), 236-244, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2006.01.02010.1016/j.neunet.2006.01.020
  9. Chang, D.Y. (1996). Theory and methodology: applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-210.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
  10. Chou, T.C. & Cheng, S.C. (2006). Design and implementation of a semantic image classification and retrieval of organizational memory information systems using analytical hierarchy process, Omega, 34(2), 125-134, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.00410.1016/j.omega.2004.08.004
  11. Daft, R.L. (2009). Organization Theory and Design (Tenth Edition). US: South-Western Cengage Learning.
  12. Damjanovic, V. (2010). Semantic reengineering of business processes, Information Systems, 35(4), 496-504, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2009.06.00310.1016/j.is.2009.06.003
  13. Dessler, G. (2007). Human Resource Management (11th Edition). US: Prentice Hall.
  14. DuBrin, A.J. (2006). Fundamentals of Organizational Behavior (4th editions). US: South-Western College Pub.
  15. Grover, V., Jeong, S.R., Kettinger, W.J & Teng, T.C. (1995). The implementation of business process re-engineering, Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 109 - 144.10.1080/07421222.1995.11518072
  16. Hall, J.M. & Johnson, M.E. (2009). When Should Process Be Art, Not Science, Harvard Business Review, Retrieved July 20, 2012, from <http://www.virginia.edu/sciartproject/docs/WhenShouldaProcessBeArt.pdf>
  17. Hatch, M.J. & Cunliffe, Al. (2006). Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives(2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Hwang, C.L. & Yoon, K (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision-Making; Methods and Applications- a State of the Art Survey, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
  19. Ishizaka, A. & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336-14345, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.14310.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
  20. Ketchen, D.J. & Hult, T.M. (2007). Toward greater integration of insights from organization theory and supply chain management, Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 455-458, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.00110.1016/j.jom.2006.05.001
  21. Mintzberg, H. (2007). Mintzberg on Management. New York: The Free Press.
  22. Momeni, M. (2007). New Topics in the Operations Research [in Persian]. Tehran: University of Tehran.
  23. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: SAGE.
  24. Robbins, S.P. (2006). Organization Theory: Structure, Design and Application. USA: Pearson Academic.
  25. Sarmad, Z. (2009). The Research Method in Behavioral Science [in Persian]. Tehran: Aghah.
  26. Saaty, T.L. & Peniwati K. (2007). Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences. Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.
  27. Sethi, R. & Nicholson, C.Y. (2001). Structural and contextual correlates of charged behavior in product development teams, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(3), 154-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.183015410.1111/1540-5885.1830154
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-012-0025-1 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Language: English
Page range: 246 - 254
Published on: Oct 31, 2012
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2012 Alireza Aslani, Feryal Aslani, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.