Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Influence of Broadband Regulation in EU on the Development of the Regulated Technology Cover

The Influence of Broadband Regulation in EU on the Development of the Regulated Technology

By: Andrej Mihevc  
Open Access
|Sep 2011

References

  1. Bae S., Hoeel J. & Youngbae K. (2008). Innovation patterns and policy implications of ADSL penetration in Korea: A case study. Telecommunications Policy, 32: 307-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2007.08.00310.1016/j.telpol.2007.08.003
  2. Bouckaert J. & van Dijk T. (2010). Access regulation, competition, and broadband penetration: An international study. Telecommunications Policy 34: 661-671. DOI:10.1016/j.telpol.2010.09.001.10.1016/j.telpol.2010.09.001
  3. Brandão A. & Sarmento P. (2007). Access pricing: A comparison between full deregulation and two alternative instruments of access price regulation, cost based and retail minus. Telecommunications Policy, 31: 236-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2007.03.003.10.1016/j.telpol.2007.03.003
  4. Cave M. & Prosperetti L. (2001). European telecommunications infrastructure. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17: 416-431. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/17.3.416.10.1093/oxrep/17.3.416
  5. Commission of the European Communities (2007). Explanatory note to the Commission recommendation On Relevant Product and Service Markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communication networks and services: Commission of the European Communities. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/library/recomm_guidelines/index_en.htm
  6. Commission of the European Communities (2010). Progress report on the single European Electronic Communications Market 2009 (15TH Report) SEC(2010) 630. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/doc/implementation_enforcement/annualreports/15threport/comm_en.pdf
  7. Dippon C. H. & Ware H. (2010). Wholesale unbundling and intermodal competition: Telecommunications Policy, 34: 54-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2009.11.002.10.1016/j.telpol.2009.11.002
  8. European Parliament and of the Council (2002). Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive), Official Journal L108. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/library/legislation/index_en.htm
  9. European Parliament and of the Council (2009). Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the authorization of electronic communications networks and services (Text with EEA relevance), Official Journal L337. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/library/legislation/index_en.htm
  10. ERG (2009). ERG Report: Regulatory Accounting in Practice 2009, ERG (09) 41, 1-41. Available from: http://www.erg.eu.int/doc/publications/2009/erg_09_41_regulatory_accounting_report_in_practice_2009_final.pdf
  11. ERG (2009). Report on Next Generation Access - Economic Analysis and Regulatory Principles, ERG (09)17, 2009. Available from: http://www.erg.eu.int/documents/erg/index_en.htm
  12. Höffler F. (2005). Cost and Benefits from infrastructure competition. Estimating Welfare Effects from Broadband Access Competition, Max Planck Institute, 1-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2007.05.00410.1016/j.telpol.2007.05.004
  13. Laffont J. J. & Tirole J. (2000). Competition in Telecommunications. London, The MIT Press, 2000.
  14. Mason R. & Valetti T. M. (2001). Competition in communications networks: Pricing and regulation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17: 389-415. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/17.3.389.10.1093/oxrep/17.3.389
  15. Nicewander W. A. & Rodgers J. L. (1988). Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient, The American Statistician, 42(1): 59-66.10.1080/00031305.1988.10475524
  16. Pavlos C. S. (2009). Does smallness affect the liberalisation of telecommunications? Case of Cyprus, Telecommunications Policy, 33: 215-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2008.12.00610.1016/j.telpol.2008.12.006
  17. Picot A. & Wernick C. (2007). The role of government in broadband access, Telecommunications Policy, 31: 660-674. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2007.08.002.10.1016/j.telpol.2007.08.002
  18. Siciliani P. (2010). Access regulation on NGA-A financial, market lead solution to bridge the gap between US and European diverging regulatory approaches, Telecommunications Policy, 34: 287-298. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2009.12.004.10.1016/j.telpol.2009.12.004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-011-0013-x | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Language: English
Page range: 128 - 136
Published on: Sep 8, 2011
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2011 Andrej Mihevc, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 44 (2011): Issue 4 (July 2011)