Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Development of New Product/Process Development Procedure for SMEs Cover

Development of New Product/Process Development Procedure for SMEs

Organizacija
Volume 43 (2010): Issue 2 (March 2010)
By: Mateja Šenk,  Peter Metlikovič,  Matjaž Maletič and  Boštjan Gomišček  
Open Access
|Apr 2010

References

  1. Biazzo, S. (2009). Flexibility, Structuration and Simultaneity in New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26: 336-353.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Carbonara, N. & Schiuma, G. (2004). The new product development process within industrial districts: A cognitive approach. International Journal of Product Development, 1(1): 92-107. DOI: 10.1504/IJPD.2004.00489210.1504/IJPD.2004.004892
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Carbonara, N. & Scozzi, B. (2006). Cognitive maps to analyze new product development processes: A case study, Technovation, 26: 1233-1243. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.00710.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.007
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Carpinetti, C. R., Buosi, T. & Gerölamo, M. C. (2003). Quality management and improvement: A framework and a business-process reference model, Business Process Management Journal, 9(4): 543-554. DOI:10.11088/146715031048455310.11088/1467150310484553
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, R. (2007). Doing it Right, Winning with New Products; Product Development Institute.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, R. & Edgett, S. (2006). Portfolio Management for New Products, Picking the Winners. Product Development Institute, Aucaster, Canada.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, R., Edgett, S. & Kleinschmidt, E. (2002). Improving New Product Development Performance and Practices, Benchmarking study: Houston, American Productivity & Quality Center.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities-what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11): 1105-1121. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<110510.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Fredericks, E. (2005). Cross-functional involvement in new product development: A resource dependency and human capital perspective, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(3): 327-341. DOI: 10.1108/1352275051060337010.1108/13522750510603370
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Gomes, J., de Weerd-Nederhof, P., Pearson, A., & Cunha, M., (2003). Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development, Technovation, 23: 185-191.10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00107-9
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Gunasekaran, A. (1998). An integrated product development-quality management system for manufacturing, The TQM Magazine, 10(2): 115-123. DOI: 10.1108/0954478981021142510.1108/09544789810211425
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Griffin, A. and Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(3): 191-215. DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.133019110.1111/1540-5885.1330191
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Jassawalla, R. A. & Sashittal, C. H. (1998). An Examination of Collaboration in High-Technology. New Product Development Processes, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15: 237-254. DOI: 10.1234/1234567810.1234/12345678
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Kahn, K., Barczak, G. & Moss, R. (2006). Perspective: Establishing an NPD Best Practices Framework, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23: 106-116. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00186.x10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00186.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way, University of Michigan.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Mascitelli, R. (2006). Quality & len product development, methods, tools, approach. California manufacturing Technology Consulting.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Meirovich, G. (2006). Quality of Design and Quality of Conformance: Contingency and Synergistic Approaches, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17(2): 205 — 219. DOI: 10.1080/1478336050045064010.1080/14783360500450640
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Metlikovič, P. (2007). Ključni dejavniki uspešnosti pri izboljševanju razvoja izdelkov in procesov v podjetju [The key success factors of improving the product development and process in the company], Zbornik posveta Forum 2007-posvet Slovenskega združenja za projektni management.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Metlikovič P., Interna poročila z delavnic v podjetjih [Internal reports from the workshops in companies], 2006 do 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Morgan, J. M. & Liker, J. K. (2006). The Toyota Product Development System. Productivity Press New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Simpson, M. (2009). New product development practice application to an early-stage firm: the case of the PaperPro® StackMaster™, Design Studies, 30(5): 561-587. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2009.02.001.10.1016/j.destud.2009.02.001
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Noke, H. & Hughes, M. (2010). Climbing the value chain: Strategies to create a new product development capability in mature SMEs, International Jurnal of Operations & Production Mnagement, 30(2): DOI:10.1108/0144357101101868010.1108/01443571011018680
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. O'Dwyer, M. & Ledwith, A. (2009). Determinants of new product performance in small firms, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 15(2): 124-136. DOI:10.1108/1355255091094454810.1108/13552550910944548
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Nilsson-Witell, L., Antoni, M. & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2005). Continuous improvement in product development Improvement programs and quality principles, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(8): 753-768. DOI: 10.1108/0265671051061721010.1108/02656710510617210
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Owens, J. D. (2007). Why do some UK SMEs still find the implementation of a new product development process problematical? An exploratory investigation, Management Decision, 45(2): 235-251. DOI 10.1108/0025174071072726910.1108/00251740710727269
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Polycom: Interno gradivo projekta NPD [Internal material of NPD project], Polycom d.o.o., 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Schilling, M. A. and Hill, C. W. L. (1998). Managing the new product development process: strategic imperatives, Academy of Management Executive, 12(3): 67-81. DOI: 10.1177/10946705003100110.1177/109467050031001
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Shen, X. X., Tan, K. C. and Xie, M. (2000). An integrated approach to innovative product development using Kano's model and QFD, European Journal of Innovation Management, 3(2): 91-99. DOI:10.1504/IJCAT.2006.01076410.1504/IJCAT.2006.010764
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Sun, H., Zhao, Y. Y., and Yau, H. K. (2009). The relationship between quality management and the speed of new product development, The TQM Journal, 21(6): 576-588. DOI: 10.1108/1754273091099585510.1108/17542730910995855
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Suomala, P. & Jokioinen, I. (2003). The patterns of success in product development: a case study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(4), 213-227. DOI:10.1108/1460106031050093110.1108/14601060310500931
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Škufca-Zaveršnik, B. (2005). Organiziranost in pomen projektnega managementa v podjetju z multiprojektnim poslovanjem [The organization and the importance of the project management in company with the multi project business]. Magistrsko delo, Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Thia Kah-Hin Chai, C. W., Bauly, J. and Xin, Y. (2005). An exploratory study of the use of quality tools and techniques in product development, The TQM Magazine, 17(5): 406-424. DOI: 10.1108/0954478051061592410.1108/09544780510615924
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Vale, S. & Avella, L. (2003). Cross-functionality and leadership of the new product development teams, European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1): 32-47. DOI: 10.1108/1460106031045631910.1108/14601060310456319
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-010-0009-y | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 76 - 86
Published on: Apr 13, 2010
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
quality management,
new product development procedure,
project management,
cross-functional team,
project portfolio
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management, organization, corporate governance

© 2010 Mateja Šenk, Peter Metlikovič, Matjaž Maletič, Boštjan Gomišček, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 43 (2010): Issue 2 (March 2010)