Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analyzing the Process of Patent Submission with a Special Emphasis on the Phases of the Research Process - the Case of Slovenia Cover

Analyzing the Process of Patent Submission with a Special Emphasis on the Phases of the Research Process - the Case of Slovenia

Open Access
|Oct 2009

References

  1. Balconi M., Breschi S. & Lissoni F. (2004). Networks of inventors and role of academia. Research Policy, 33:127-145. Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2.10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2
  2. Baldini N. Grimaldi R., Sobrero M. & (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35: 518-532, Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.00410.1016/j.respol.2006.01.004
  3. Bozeman B. (2000). Technology and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29: 627-655, Elsevier Science. DOI: S0048-7333_99.00093-110.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
  4. Bühler D. (2009). Concepts and strategies for protecting IP, European Patent Attorney, Maiwald Patentanwalts GmbH. Presentation and internal documents, Ljubljana, 2009.
  5. Chang Y. C., Chen M. H. & Yang P. Y. (2006). Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: Towards a ‘scientific-economic’ framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73:119-213, Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.004.10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.004
  6. COBISS http://splet02.izum.si/cobiss/Bibliographies.jsp?init=t
  7. COBISS, 2006 (internal extract from researcher database).
  8. Cole J. & Cole S. (1973). Social stratification in Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  9. Czarnitzki D., Glanzel W. & Hussinger K. (2009). Heterogeneity of patent activity and its implications for scientific research. Research Policy, 38:26-34, Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.001.10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.001
  10. Dai Y., Popp D. & Bretschneider S. (2005). Institutions and Intellectual Property: The Influence of Institutional Forces on University Patenting. Journal of Policy and Management, 24 (3): 579-598. DOI: 10.1002/pam.20116.10.1002/pam.20116
  11. Davis L. (2004). Intellectual property rights, strategy and policy. Economics of innovation & New technology, 13 (5):399-415. DOI: 10.1080/1043859042000188683.10.1080/1043859042000188683
  12. Dietz J. S. & Bozeman B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34:349 - 367. Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008.10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008
  13. Employment Related Industrial Property Rights Act, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 45/95.
  14. Erickson G. S. (2003). The Patenting Process, Innovation, and Size. Knowledge, Technolog, & Policy, 15 (4):24-36.
  15. Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C. & Terra B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29: 313-330, Elsevier Science. DOI: S0048- 7333_99.00069-4.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
  16. Etzkowitz H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32: 109-121, Elsevier Science. DOI: S0048-7333(02)00009-4.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
  17. Geuna A. & Nesta L. J. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy. 35: 790-807. Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.00510.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005
  18. Giuri, P., Mariani, M., S. Brusoni, G. Crespi, D., Francoz, A., Gambardella, W., Garcia-Fontes, A., Geunac, R., Gonzales, D. Harhoff, K., Hoisl, C., Le Bas, A., Luzzi, L., Magazzini, L., Nesta, O., Nomaler, N., Palomeras, P., Patel, M., Romanelli, B. & Verspagen, B. (2007). Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Research Policy. 36: 1107-1127. Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.008.10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.008
  19. Hockaday, T. (2009). Technology Transfer from the University of Oxford, Presentation of the University of Oxford's Technology Transfer Office. ISIS Innovation Ltd.
  20. Jaffe, A. B., Traajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3): 577-598.10.2307/2118401
  21. Lach, S. & Schankerman, M. (2003). Incentives and invention in Universities, Working paper 9727, available from: http://.nber.org/papers/w9727
  22. Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology (MVZT), Internal documents, 2005 (Presentation of science research activities, PPT presentation)
  23. Morgan, R. P., Kruytbosch, C. & Kannankutty, N. (2001). Patenting and innovation activity of U. S. Scientists and Engineers in the academic sector: comparisons with industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2): 173-183.
  24. Owen-Smith, J. & Powell, W. (2001). To patent or not, faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2): 99-114.
  25. Parvan, S. V. (2007). Statistics in focus: Community Innovation Statistics. Eurostat, European Communities, Luxembourg: 8 pp.
  26. Rules on Remuneration for Innovations Created in the Employment Relationship (Pravilnik o nagradah za inovacije, ustvarjene v delovnem razmerju), Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 31/98 (18/04/1998) and 14/99 (12/03/1999).
  27. Rules on the Adoption of Innovations and Inventions of the University of Ljubljana (Pravilnik o prevzemu inovacij in izumov Univerze v Ljubljani) http://www.unilj.si/RaziskovalnoDelo/RaziskovalnoDelo.asp
  28. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth ed., The Free Press, New York.
  29. Slovenian Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) - patent definition and access to databases http://www.uil-sipo.si/
  30. Stephan, P. E. & Levin, S. G. (1992). Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The importance of Age, Place and Time. Oxford University Press, New York.
  31. Ženko, Z. & Marn, J. (2000): O patentni zaščiti računalniških programov. Naše gospodarstvo, 46(5/6): 773-783.
  32. Ženko, Z. & Marn, J. (1999): Patentna zaščita računalniških programov. Pospeševanje razvoja Slovenije. Ed. Mulej M., Maribor 02-03 December 1999. Maribor. Zbornik 20. PODIM.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-009-0013-2 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Language: English
Page range: 156 - 164
Published on: Oct 1, 2009
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2009 Mitja Ruzzier, Tine Nagy, Robert Ravnihar, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 42 (2009): Issue 5 (September 2009)