Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Technological, Marketing and Complementary Competencies Driving Innovative Performance of Slovenian Manufacturing Firms Cover

Technological, Marketing and Complementary Competencies Driving Innovative Performance of Slovenian Manufacturing Firms

Organizacija
Volume 42 (2009): Issue 3 (May 2009)
By: Tanja Rajkovič and  Janez Prašnikar  
Open Access
|Jun 2009

References

  1. Bassanini, A. & Scarpetta, S. (2001). The driving forces of economic growth: Panel data evidence for the OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies, 33. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from http:// http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/16/83/83/PDF/EconomicStudies_01.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Calantone, R., Garcia, R. & Dröge, C. (2003). The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20 (2), 90-103. DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.2002003.10.1111/1540-5885.2002003
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Chang, T. (1996). Cultivating global experience curve advantage on technology and marketing capabilities. International Marketing Review, 13, 22-42. DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000004460.10.1108/EUM0000000004460
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Clark, K. B. & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Commission of the EC (2005). Working together for growth and jobs: A new start for the Lisbon strategy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0024:FIN:EN:PDF
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58,(4), 37-52.10.2307/1251915
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Dumaine, B. (1989). How managers can succeed through speed. Fortune, 13, 54-59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Economist, The (2008). A gathering storm? The Economist, 2008, November 22-28, 67-68.10.1111/j.1468-0270.2008.00829.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Ferligoj, A. (1989). Razvrščanje v skupine. Metodološki zvezki, 4. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Fisher, R.J. & Maltz, E. (1997). Enhancing communication between marketing and engineering: The moderating role of relative. Journal of Marketing, 61,(3), 54-70.10.2307/1251789
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Fowler, S., King, A. W., Marsh, S. J., & Victor, B. (2000). Beyond products: new strategic imperatives for developing competencies in dynamic environments. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 357-377. DOI: 10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00029-1.10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00029-1
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Grant, R. M. (2001). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. In Zack, M. H. (ed.), Knowledge and Strategy. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 3-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, (4), 883-895. DOI: 10.1162/0034653043125194.10.1162/0034653043125194
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Guellec, D. & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2001). OECD economic studies, ( 33). Retrieved October 12, 2008, from http:// http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/26/32/1958639.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Hafeez, K., Malak N. & Zhang, Y. B. (2007). Outsourcing noncore assets and competences of a firm using analytic hierarchy process. Computers & Operations Research, 34 (12), 3592-3608. DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.004.10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.004
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Hagedoorn, J. & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32, 1365-1379. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00137-3.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00137-3
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Hall, B.H. (1999). Innovation and market value. NBER Working Paper Series, w6984. Retrieved November 7, 2008, from http://www.nber.org/papers/W6984.pdf10.3386/w6984
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Hamel, G. & Heene, A. (eds.) (1994). Competence-based competition. Chichester: John Wiley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Khurana, A. & Rosenthal, S. R. (1997). Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 38 (2), 103-120.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Kim, J.Y., Wong, V. & Eng, T.Y. (2005). Product variety strategy for improving new product development proficiencies. Technovation, 25, 1001-1015. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.011.10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.011
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Kirner, E., Kinkel, S., & Jaeger, A. (2008). Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms - An empirical analysis of German industry. Research Policy, 38 (3), 447-458. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.011.10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.011
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Kok, W. (2004). Facing the challenge: The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Koufteros, X. & Marcoulides, G.A. (2006). Product development practices and performance: A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 103, 286-307. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.08.004.10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.08.004
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Lokshin, B., Van Gils, A. & Bauer, E. (2009). Crafting firm competencies to improve innovative performance. European Management Journal, 27 (3), 187-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2008.08.005.10.1016/j.emj.2008.08.005
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. McEvily, S. K., Eisenhardt, K. M. & Prescott, J. E. (2004). The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 713-722. DOI: 10.1002/smj.425.10.1002/smj.425
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. OECD. (1997). Revision of high technology sector and product classification. STI Working Papers 1997/2. Paris: OECD.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Paul, J. V. & Peter, J. W. (1994). Core competencies, competitive advantage and market analysis: forging the links. In Hamel, G. & Heene, A. (eds.), Competence-based Competition (77–110). New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79-91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Prajogo, D. I., McDermott, P. & Goh, M. (2008). Impact of value chain activities on quality and innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28 (7), 615-635. DOI: 10.1108/01443570810881785.10.1108/01443570810881785
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Prašnikar, J. (2006). From Lisbon to "Lisbon". In Prašnikar, J. (ed.), Competitiveness, social responsibility and economic growth (2–18). Hauppague: Nova Science.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Prašnikar, J., Lisjak, M., Buhovac, Rejc A. & Štembergar M. (2008). Identifying and exploiting the inter relationships between technological and marketing capabilities. Long Range Planning, 41 (5), 530-554. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2008.06.005.10.1016/j.lrp.2008.06.005
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Ravald, A. & Grönroos. C. (1996). The value concept and relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 30 (2), 19-30. DOI: 10.1108/03090569610106626.10.1108/03090569610106626
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). Research note: Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 687-699. DOI: 10.1002/smj.180.10.1002/smj.180
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Sanchez, R. (2004). Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence. Journal of Business research, 57, 518-532. DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00318-1.10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00318-1
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Schmalensee, R. (1985). Do markets differ much? American Economics Review, 75 (3), 341-351.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Song, M., Droge C., Hanvanich S. & Catalone R. (2005). Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 259-276. DOI: 10.1002/smj.450.10.1002/smj.450
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Stanovnik, P. & Kos, M. (2005). Technology foresight in Slovenia. Ljubljana: Institute for Economic Research.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Swink, M. & Song, M. (2007). Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration on new product development time and competitive advantage. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 203-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.03.001.10.1016/j.jom.2006.03.001
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why - An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31, 947-967. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Tidd, J. & Bodley, K. (2002). The influence of project novelty on the new product development process. R&D Management, 32 (2), 127-138.10.1111/1467-9310.00245
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Treacy, M. & Wiersima, F. (1993). Customer intimacy and other value disciplines. Harvard Business Review, 71 (1), 84-93.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Vorhies, D. W. (1998). An investigation of the factors leading to the development of marketing capabilities and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6, 3-23.10.1080/096525498346676
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Vorhies, D. W. & Harker, M. (2000). The capabilities and performance advantages of market-driven firms: An empirical investigation. Australian Journal of Management, 25 (2), 145-172.10.1177/031289620002500203
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Wang, Y., Lo, H. P. & Yang, Y. (2004). The constituents of core competencies and firm performance: Evidence from high-technology firms in China. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 249-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeng-tecman.2004.09.001.10.1016/j.jeng-tecman.2004.09.001
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-009-0005-2 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 77 - 86
Published on: Jun 10, 2009
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Technological,
marketing and complementary competencies,
innovative performance,
technology leaders and followers,
innovation policy
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management, organization, corporate governance

© 2009 Tanja Rajkovič, Janez Prašnikar, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 42 (2009): Issue 3 (May 2009)