Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Technological, Marketing and Complementary Competencies Driving Innovative Performance of Slovenian Manufacturing Firms Cover

Technological, Marketing and Complementary Competencies Driving Innovative Performance of Slovenian Manufacturing Firms

Organizacija
Volume 42 (2009): Issue 3 (May 2009)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jun 2009
References

References

  1. Bassanini, A. & Scarpetta, S. (2001). The driving forces of economic growth: Panel data evidence for the OECD countries., 33. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Calantone, R., Garcia, R. & Dröge, C. (2003). The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning,, 20 (2), 90-103. DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.2002003.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Chang, T. (1996). Cultivating global experience curve advantage on technology and marketing capabilities., 13, 22-42. DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000004460.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Clark, K. B. & Fujimoto, T. (1991).. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Commission of the EC (2005).. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations., 58,(4), 37-52.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Dumaine, B. (1989). How managers can succeed through speed., 13, 54-59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Economist, The (2008). A gathering storm?, 2008, November 22-28, 67-68.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Ferligoj, A. (1989).. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Fisher, R.J. & Maltz, E. (1997). Enhancing communication between marketing and engineering: The moderating role of relative., 61,(3), 54-70.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Fowler, S., King, A. W., Marsh, S. J., & Victor, B. (2000). Beyond products: new strategic imperatives for developing competencies in dynamic environments., 17, 357-377. DOI: 10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00029-1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Grant, R. M. (2001). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. In Zack, M. H. (ed.),. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 3-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries., 86, (4), 883-895. DOI: 10.1162/0034653043125194.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Guellec, D. & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2001)., ( 33). Retrieved October 12, 2008, from
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Hafeez, K., Malak N. & Zhang, Y. B. (2007). Outsourcing noncore assets and competences of a firm using analytic hierarchy process., 34 (12), 3592-3608. DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.004.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Hagedoorn, J. & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?, 32, 1365-1379. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00137-3.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Hall, B.H. (1999). Innovation and market value., w6984. Retrieved November 7, 2008, from
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Hamel, G. & Heene, A. (eds.) (1994).. Chichester: John Wiley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Khurana, A. & Rosenthal, S. R. (1997). Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development., 38 (2), 103-120.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Kim, J.Y., Wong, V. & Eng, T.Y. (2005). Product variety strategy for improving new product development proficiencies., 25, 1001-1015. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.011.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Kirner, E., Kinkel, S., & Jaeger, A. (2008). Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms - An empirical analysis of German industry., 38 (3), 447-458. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.011.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Kok, W. (2004).. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Koufteros, X. & Marcoulides, G.A. (2006). Product development practices and performance: A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis., 103, 286-307. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.08.004.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Lokshin, B., Van Gils, A. & Bauer, E. (2009). Crafting firm competencies to improve innovative performance., 27 (3), 187-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2008.08.005.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. McEvily, S. K., Eisenhardt, K. M. & Prescott, J. E. (2004). The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies., 25, 713-722. DOI: 10.1002/smj.425.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. OECD. (1997).. Paris: OECD.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Paul, J. V. & Peter, J. W. (1994). Core competencies, competitive advantage and market analysis: forging the links. In Hamel, G. & Heene, A. (eds.), Competence-based Competition (77–110). New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation., 68, 79-91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Prajogo, D. I., McDermott, P. & Goh, M. (2008). Impact of value chain activities on quality and innovation., 28 (7), 615-635. DOI: 10.1108/01443570810881785.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Prašnikar, J. (2006). From Lisbon to "Lisbon". In Prašnikar, J. (ed.),(2–18). Hauppague: Nova Science.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Prašnikar, J., Lisjak, M., Buhovac, Rejc A. & Štembergar M. (2008). Identifying and exploiting the inter relationships between technological and marketing capabilities., 41 (5), 530-554. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2008.06.005.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Ravald, A. & Grönroos. C. (1996). The value concept and relationship marketing., 30 (2), 19-30. DOI: 10.1108/03090569610106626.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). Research note: Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation., 22, 687-699. DOI: 10.1002/smj.180.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Sanchez, R. (2004). Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence., 57, 518-532. DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00318-1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Schmalensee, R. (1985). Do markets differ much?, 75 (3), 341-351.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Song, M., Droge C., Hanvanich S. & Catalone R. (2005). Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts., 26, 259-276. DOI: 10.1002/smj.450.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Stanovnik, P. & Kos, M. (2005).. Ljubljana: Institute for Economic Research.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Swink, M. & Song, M. (2007). Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration on new product development time and competitive advantage., 25, 203-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.03.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why - An empirical analysis., 31, 947-967. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Tidd, J. & Bodley, K. (2002). The influence of project novelty on the new product development process., 32 (2), 127-138.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Treacy, M. & Wiersima, F. (1993). Customer intimacy and other value disciplines., 71 (1), 84-93.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Vorhies, D. W. (1998). An investigation of the factors leading to the development of marketing capabilities and organizational effectiveness., 6, 3-23.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Vorhies, D. W. & Harker, M. (2000). The capabilities and performance advantages of market-driven firms: An empirical investigation., 25 (2), 145-172.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Wang, Y., Lo, H. P. & Yang, Y. (2004). The constituents of core competencies and firm performance: Evidence from high-technology firms in China., 21, 249-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeng-tecman.2004.09.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-009-0005-2 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 77 - 86
Published on: Jun 10, 2009
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Technological,
marketing and complementary competencies,
innovative performance,
technology leaders and followers,
innovation policy
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management, organization, corporate governance

© 2009 Tanja Rajkovič, Janez Prašnikar, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 42 (2009): Issue 3 (May 2009)
Previous article
Next article