Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Best Practice Model for Useful Suggestions Management Cover

A Best Practice Model for Useful Suggestions Management

Organizacija
Volume 41 (2008): Issue 2 (March 2008)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Nov 2008
References

References

  1. Banbury, C. M. & Mitchell, W. (1995). The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival., 16(5): 161-182.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Brouwer, E. & Kleinknecht, A. (1996). Firm size, small business presence and sales of innovative products: A micro-econometric analysis., 8(3): 189-201.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Burgar, J. (2001)., Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business - University of Maribor.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Cancer, V., Mulej, M. (2006). Systemic decision analysis approaches., 35(7/8): 1059-1070.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Chan, F. T. S., Lau, H. C. W., Ip, R. W. L., Chan, H. K. & Kong, S. (2005). Implementation of total productive maintenance:A case study., 95(1): 71-94.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, R. G. (1999). From Experience: The invisible success factors in product innovation., 16(2): 115-133.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Cormican, K. & O'sullivan, D. (2004). Auditing best practice for effective product innovation management., 24(10): 819-829.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, C. M. & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2003)., Boston, McGraw-Hill.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms., 3(2): 179-201.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Drejer, A. (2002). Situations for innovation management: towards a contingency model., 5(1): 4-17.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Drucker, P. F. (1967)., New York, Harper & Row.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Freel, M. S. (2000). Barriers to Product Innovation in Small Manufacturing Firms., 18(2): 60-80.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Hadjimanolis, A. (2000). An investigation of innovation antecedents in small firms in the context of a small developing., 30(3): 235-245.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Hitt, M. A., Keats, B. W. & Demarie, S. M. (1998). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century., 12(4): 22-42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J. & Perren, L. (1998). Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review., 18(1): 39-55.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. IMB Consulting (2004)., Amstetten, IMB Consulting.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Jug, K. (2004)., Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics - University of Ljubljana.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Kaynak, H. (2003). The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance., 21(4): 405-435.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Kobayashi, I. (1990)., Cambridge, Mass., Productivity Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Koberg, C. S., Detienne, D. R. & Heppard, K. A. (2003). An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation., 14(1): 21-45.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Kolarik, W. J. (1999)., Boston, WCB/McGraw-Hill.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Liberatore, M. J. & Stylianou, A. C. (1995). Expert support systems for new product development decision making:A modeling framework and., 41(8): 1296-1316.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. March-Chorda, I., Gunasekaran, A. & Lloria-Aramburo, B. (2002). Product development process in Spanish SMEs: an empirical research., 22(5): 301-312.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Marolt, J. (1998). Standardi ISO 9000 in upravljanje celovite kakovosti.Bernardin, Slovensko zdruzenje za kakovost.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Mckone, K. E., Schroeder, R. G. & Cua, K. O. (1999). Total productive maintenance: a contextual view., 17(2): 123-144.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Mckone, K. E., Schroeder, R. G. & Cua, K. O. (2001). The impact of total productive maintenance practices on manufacturing performance., 19(1): 39-58.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Mitchell, D. W. & Bruckner Coles, C. (2004). Establishing a continuing business model innovation process., 25(3): 39-49.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Patterson, M. L. (1998). From experience: linking product innovation to business growth., 15(5): 390-402.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Petrarolo, D. (1998). The ž20 keys' to workplace improvement., 40(1): 22-28.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Powell, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study., 16(1): 15-37.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Shepherd, C. & Ahmed, P. K. (2000). From product innovation to solutions innovation: a new paradigm for competitive advantage., 3(2): 100-106.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Treven, S., Mulej, M. (2007). The systemic approach to the encouragement of innovativeness through employee diversity management., 36(2): 144-156.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Tuominen, M., Piippo, P., Ichimura, T. & Matsumoto, Y. (1999). An analysis of innovation management systems' characteristics.,(1): 135-143.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Vermeulen, P. A. M. (2005). Uncovering Barriers to Complex Incremental Product Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Financial Services Firms., 43(4): 432-452.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Vossen, R. W. (1998). Relative strengths and weaknesses of small firms in innovation., 16(3): 88-94.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Wakasugi, R. & Koyata, F. (1997). R&D, firm size and innovation outputs: Are Japanese firms efficient in product development?, 14(5): 383-392.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Wheelwright, S. C. & Clark, K. B. (1992)., New York, Free Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Workman Jr, J. P. (1993). Marketing's limited role in new product development in one computer systems firm., 30(4): 405-421.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Xueli, H., Soutar, G. N. & Brown, A. (2002). New Product Development Processes in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Some Australian Evidence., 40(1): 27-42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Zenko, Z., Mulej, M. (2000). Sodelovanje zaposlenih pri obvladovanju podjetij v inovativnih družbah., 33(6): 375-383.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10051-008-0006-6 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 50 - 61
Published on: Nov 18, 2008
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Useful Suggestions Management,
Implementation,
Case Studies,
Research and Development
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management, organization, corporate governance

© 2008 Igor Prodan, Branka Ahlin, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 41 (2008): Issue 2 (March 2008)
Previous article
Next article