References
- 1. Human health risk assessment toolkit: chemical hazards (2010). IPCS project on the Harmonization of Approaches to the Assessment of Risk from Exposure to Chemicals, WHO, p. 88.
- 2. Binetti, R. et al. (2008). Exponential growth of new chemicals and evolution of information relevant to risk control. Ann. Ist. Super Sanita, 44 (1), 13-15.
- 3. Allanou, R. et al. (2003). Public availability of data on EU high production volume chemicals - Part 2. CHIMICA OGGI (Chemistry today), July-August, 59-64.
- 4. Irigaray, P. et al. (2007). Lifestyle-related factors and environmental agents causing cancer: an overview. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 61(10), 640-658.18055160
- 5. Hwang, H.M. et al. (2008). Occurrence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in indoor dust. Science of the Total Environment, 404 (1), 26-35.
- 6. Fridén, U.E. et al. (2011). Chlorinated paraffins in indoor air and dust: Concentrations, congener patterns, and human exposure. Environment International, 6.
- 7. ISO 14040 (2006). Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles andframework. Geneva (Switzerland): International Organisation for Standardisation.
- 8. Technical Guidance Document in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment. Part I, EC, Joint Research Centre, EUR 20418 EN/2, Printed in Italy, 2003, p. 311.
- 9. Karlsson, R., & Luttropp, C. (2006). EcoDesign: what's happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue. J. of Cleaner Production, 14 (15- 16), 1291-1298.
- 10. Adu, I.K., et al. (2008). Comparison of methods for assessing environmental, health and safety (EHS) hazards in early phases of chemical process design. Process Safety and Env.Protection, 86 (2), 77-93.
- 11. Knight, P., & Jenkins, J.O. (2009). Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners perspective. J. of Cleaner Production, 17 (5), 549-558.
- 12. ECMA 341, Environmental Design Considerations for ICT & CE Products, European association for standardizing information and communication systems, [online] [accessed 14.03.2010]. Accessible: http://www.ecmainternational. org/publications/standards/Standard.htm
- 13. The Oeko-Tex Standards, [online] [accessed 10.02.2012]. Accessible: http://www.oeko-tex.com
- 14. BASTA, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute & the Swedish Construction Federation, [online] [accessed 14.09.2011]. Accessible: http://www.bastaonline.se
- 15. Nissen, N.F. (2001). Entwicklung eines ökologischen Bewertungsmodells zur Beurteilungelektronischer Systeme, Doctoral Dissertation, Technical University of Berlin, Department of Electrical Engineering, p. 202
- 16. Wenzel, H. et al. (1997). Environmental Assessment of Products. Vol 1: Methodology, Tools and Case Studies in Product Development, 564.
- 17. Lithner, D. et al. (2011). Environmental and health hazard ranking and assessment of plastic polymers based on chemical composition. Sci. of the Total Environment, 409 (10), 3309-3324.
- 18. Ahrens, A. et al. (2003). Guidance for the use of environmentally sound substances. Part 1. Fivesteps for the evaluation of environmental risks. Federal Environmental Agency, Germany, p. 66.
- 19. ECOIT, [online] [accessed 14.04.2011]. Accessible: PRé Consultants, http://www.pre.nl/content/about-pre
- 20. Idemat, Delft Technical University, [online] [accessed 14.04.2011]. Accessible: http://www.idemat.nl/
- 21. Huang H., et al. (2009). Materials selection for environmentally conscious design via a proposed life cycle environmental performance index. Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 44 (11-12), 1073-1082.
- 22. Rosenbaum, R.K. et al. (2008). USEtox-the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. of Life Cycle Assessment, 13 (7), 532-546.
- 23. Meijer, A. et al. (2005). Human Health Damages due to Indoor Sources of Organic Compounds and Radioactivity in Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Dwellings. Part 1: Characterisation Factors. Int. J. of Life Cycle Assessment, 10 (5), 309-316.
- 24. Braungart, M. et al. (2007). Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions - a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. J. of Cleaner Production, 15 (13-14), 1337-1348.
- 25. Niederl-Schmidinger, A., & Narodoslawsky, M. (2008). Life cycle assessment as an engineer’s tool? J. of Cleaner Production, 16, 245-252.
- 26. Cho, K.T. (2003). Multicriteria decision methods: an attempt to evaluate and unify. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37, 1099-1119.
- 27. Johansson, J., & Luttropp, C. (2009). Material hygiene: improving recycling of WEEE demonstrated on dishwashers. J. of Cleaner Production, 17 (1), 26-35.
- 28. Globally Harmonized System of classification and labelling of chemicals. (2000). United Nations, New York and Geneva, p.431.
- 29. REACH, Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (2006. 18. XII), concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals OJ L 396 30.12.2006 1-850.
- 30. Guinee, J.B. (ed). (2002). Life cycle assessment − an operational guide to the ISOstandards. Centre of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Kluwer Academic Publishers p. 692.
- 31. Iakovoua, E. et al. (2009). A methodological framework for end-of-life management of electronic products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53 (6), 329-339.
- 32. Cerdan, C. et al. (2009). Proposal for new quantitative eco-design indicators: a first case study. J. of Cleaner Production, 17 (18), 1638-1643.
- 33. Mathieux, F. et al. (2008). ReSICLED: a new recovery-conscious design method for complex products based on a multicriteria assessment of the recoverability. J. of Cleaner Production, 16 (3), 277-298.
- 34. Otto, K.N., & Wood, K.L. (2001). Product Design, Techniques in Reverse Engineering andNew Product Development. Prentice Hall 1061
- 35. Harmonized classification and labelling of certain hazardous substances, Annex VI, table 3.2 of regulation REACH, EC No 1272/2008 (online) (accessed 15.04.2011). Accessible: http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/esis/index.php?PGM=cla
- 36. IARC Monographs on the evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, The International Agency for Research on Cancer, [online] [accessed 11.07.2011]. Accessible: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/PDFs/index.php
- 37. Michna J. et al. (2011). Management of energy and environment conservation: current methodical problems. Latv. J. Phys. Tec. Sci., 49 (1), 28-41.
- 38. Bovea, M.D., & Pérez-Belis, V. (2012). A taxonomy of eco-design tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. J. of Cleaner Production, 20(1), 61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.01210.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012
- 39. European Classification and Labelling Inspections of Preparations, including Safety Data Sheets, Final report, 64 p. [online] [accessed 03.07.2011]. Accessible: http://hesa.etui-rehs.org
- 40. Hinks J., et al. (2009). Views on chemical safety information and influences on chemical disposal behaviour in the UK. Sci. of the Total Environment, 407, 1299-1306.