Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Water quality in cutaway peatland lakes in Seda mire, Latvia Cover

References

  1. Anonymous (1992).. 2nd ed. Loveland: HACH.
  2. Anonymous (1999).Riga: Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development.
  3. Bottrell, H.H., Duncan, A., Gliwicz, Z.M., Grygierek, E., Herzig, A., Hillbricht-Ilkowska, A., Kurasawa, H., Larsson, P., Weglenska, T. (1976). A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies.,, 419-456.
  4. Clesceri, L.S., Greenberg, A.E., Eaton, A.D. [Eds] (1998).20edn. Washington DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Work Association, Water Environment Federation.
  5. Coates, J.D., Cole, K.A., Chakraborty, R., O'Connor, S.M., Achenbach, L.A. (2002). Diversity and ubiquity of bacteria capable of utilizing humic substances as electron donors for anaerobic respiration.,(5), 2445-2452.
  6. Cronberg, G., Lindmark, G., Björk, S. (1988). Mass development of the flagellate Gonyostomum semen (Raphidophyta) in Swedish forest lakes — an effect of acidification?, 217-236.
  7. Druvietis, I. (2007).(Ehrb.) Diesing expansion in Latvia's lakes. In:. Daugavpils University, Daugavpils.
  8. Farrell, C.A., Doyle, G.J. (2003). Rehabilitation of industrial cutaway Atlantic blanket bog in County Mayo, North-West Ireland.,, 21-35.
  9. Findlay, D., Paterson, J., Hendzel, L., Kling, H. (2005). Factors influencingblooms in a small boreal reservoir lake.,(1), 243-252.
  10. Girard, M., Lavoie, C., Theriault, M. (2002). The regeneration of a highly disturbed ecosystem: A mined peatland in Southern Quebec.,, 274-288.
  11. Gorham, E., Rochefort, L. (2003). Peatland restoration: A brief assessment with special reference tobogs.,, 109-119.
  12. Haglund, A.L., Tornblom, E., Bostrom, B., Tranvik, L. (2002). Large differences in the fraction of active bacteria in plankton, sediments, and biofilm.,(2), 232-241.
  13. Heino, J. (2000) Lentic macroinvertebrate assemblage structure along gradients in spatial heterogeneity, habitat size and water chemistry.,, 229-242.
  14. Hertkorn, N., Claus, H., Schmitt-Kopplin, P., Perdue, E.M., Filip, Z. (2002). Utilization and transformation of aquatic humic substances by autochthonous microorganisms.,(20), 4334-4345.
  15. Higgins, T., Colleran E. (2004). A comparative assessment of water quality in four experimental lakes created on Irish cutaway peatland. In:(pp. 372-378). Päivänen, J. (ed.). Proceedings of the 12International Peat Congress. Vol. 1.
  16. Hongve, D., Løvstad, Ø., Bjørndalen, K. (1987). Gonyostomum semen—a new nuisance to bathers in Norwegian lakes.,, 430-434.
  17. Hörnström, E. (2002). Phytoplankton in 63 limed lakes in comparison with the distribution in 500 untreated lakes with varying pH.,, 115-126.
  18. Kent, A.D., Jones, S.E., Yannarell, A.C., Graham, J.M., Lauster, G.H., Kratz, T.K., Triplett, E.W. (2004). Annual patterns in bacterioplankton community variability in a humic lake.,, 550-560.
  19. Klavins, M., Rodinov, V., Druvietis, I. (2003). Aquatic chemistry and humic substances in bog lakes in Latvia.,, 113-123.
  20. Klavins, M., Rodinovs, V., Kokorite, I. (2002). Chemistry of Surface Waters in Latvia. Rīga: LU. 286 pp.
  21. Krauklis, I. (1998). Sedas tīrelis [Seda Bog]. Grām.:(68. lpp.). Vol. 5. Rīga: Preses nams (in Latvian).
  22. Lally, H., Higgins, T., Colleran, E., Gormally, M. (2008). Lakes: A new concept for wildlife conservation on Irish cutaway peatlands. In:Vol. 1. (pp. 409-413). Farrell, C., Feehan, J. (eds.). Proceedings of the 13International Peat Congress. Tullamore.
  23. Lamers, L.P.M., Smolders, A.J.P., Roelofs, J.G.M. (2002). The restoration of fens in the Netherlands.,, 107-130.
  24. Larmanis, V. (2003) Evaluation of Threats to Biodiversity and Preparation of Conservation and Management Plan for Nature Reserve "Seda marsh" in North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve. Final Report. Research study in the framework of the UNESCO Programme on Man and the Biosphere.
  25. Lavoie, C., Grosvernier, P., Girard, M., Marcoux, K. (2003). Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands: An useful restoration tool?,, 97-107.
  26. Lepistö, L., Antikainen, S., Kivinen, J. (1994). The occurance of Gonyostomum semen (Ehr.). Diesing in Finnish lakes.,, 1-8.
  27. Lindstrom, E.S. (2000). Bacterioplankton community composition in five lakes differing in trophic status and humic content.,(2), 104-113.
  28. Lundin, L., Lode, E., Strömgren, M., Nilsson, T. (2008). Wetland: Wise after-use at terminated peat cuttings. In:Vol. 1 (pp. 414-417). Farrell, C., Feehan, J. (eds.). Proceedings of the 13International Peat Congress. Tullamore.
  29. McNally, G. (1998). Optimizing the return to Bord na Mona. In:(pp. 13-16). Egan, T. (ed.). Proceedings of the first comprehensive conference on cutaway bogland rehabilitation. Offaly, Ireland.
  30. Piper, A.M. (1944). A graphical procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analysis.,, 914-923.
  31. Tadonleke, R.D., Planas, D., Lucotte, M. (2005). Microbial food webs in boreal humic lakes and reservoirs: Ciliates as a major factor related to the dynamics of the most active bacteria.,(2), 325-341.
  32. Urtane, L., Klavins, M. (1995). Zooplankton communities of a group of lakes with different contents of humic substances in Latvia. Case study: State Teiču Bog Reserve., No. 1/2, 134-140.
  33. Utermohl, H. (1958). Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik.,, 1-38.
  34. Van Duinen, G.A., Timm, T., Smolders, A.J.P., Brock, A.M.T., Verberk, W.C.E.P., Esselink, H. (2006). Differential response of aquatic oligochaete species to increased nutrient availability — a comprehensive study between Estonian and Dutch raised bogs.,, 143-155.
  35. Vrede, K., Stensdotter, U., Lindstrom, E.S. (2003). Viral and bacterioplankton dynamics in two lakes with different humic contents.,(4), 406-15.
  36. Ward, J.V. (1992)Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc. 438 pp.
  37. Романенко В.И., Кузнецов СИ. (1974).[Ecology of Freshwa-ter Microorganisms. Guidance manual]. Ленинград: Наука (in Russian).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10046-011-0016-2 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X (formerly 1407-009X) | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Language: English
Page range: 32 - 39
Published on: Oct 8, 2011
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2011 Māris Kļaviņš, Ilga Kokorīte, Gunta Spriņge, Agnija Skuja, Elga Parele, Valērijs Rodinovs, Ivars Druvietis, Solvita Strāķe, Andris Urtāns, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.