Genetic Trend and Relationship of Meatiness Traits of Different Breed Pigs Raised in Lithuania

Ramutis Klimas; Asta Klimienė

doi:10.2478/v10046-009-0022-9

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Genetic Trend and Relationship of Meatiness Traits of Different Breed Pigs Raised in Lithuania

Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.

Volume 63 (2009): Issue 1-2 (April 2009)

By: Ramutis Klimas and Asta Klimienė

Open Access

|Jul 2009

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the genetic trend of leanness for purebred pigs, and to determine the relations between meatiness traits, age and live weight of animals. The estimation of meatiness traits (backfat and loin lean thickness, lean meat percentage) of purebred Lithuanian White (LW), Large White (La.W), Yorkshire (Y), Landrace (L), Duroc (D) and Pietrain (P) pigs grown in breeding centres was evaluated by apparatus Piglog 105, during 2000-2006. In 2006, the average lean meat percentage of purebred pigs in the breeding centres of Lithuania ranged from 56.9% (LW) to 59.5% (D). During the observation period (2000-2006), the genetic trend of the leanness of LW was 6.9% (P < 0.001), La.W and L, respectively, was 2.2 and 2.5% (P < 0.01), D was 1.6% (P < 0.05), Y was 0.2% and P was 0.6%. A higher genetic trend of the leanness in the LW pig breed can be explained by import of English La.W boars. Correlation analysis showed that lean meat percentage of pigs is more related to backfat thickness (r = from -0.84 to -0.95, P < 0.001), than to loin lean thickness (r = from 0.11 to 0.30). Live weight of pigs had more influence on mentioned meatiness traits than age.

References

Anonymous (1991) PIGLOG 105 Users Guide. Soborg, Denmark: SFK -- Technology, 14 pp.
Search in Google Scholar
Anonymous (2001). StatSoft, Inc. Statistica for Windows version 6.0.http://www.statsoft.com
Search in Google Scholar
De Vries, A.G., Kanis, E. (1994). Selection for efficiency of lean tissue deposition in pigs. In: Principles of Pig Science. (pp. 23--41). Cole, D.J.A., Wiseman, J., Varley, A.A. (eds.). Nottingham Univ. Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Hoste, S. (2003). Genotype environment interactions. In: Perspectives in Pig Science. (pp. 25--39). Wiseman, J., Varley, M.A., Kemp, B. (eds.). Nottingham Univ. Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Klimas, R., Klimienė, A. (2000). Phenotypic evaluation of the leanness of breeding pigs in Lithuania. Agraarteadus, 2, 176--181.
Search in Google Scholar
Klimas, R., Klimienė, A. (2000). Phenotypic correlation of pig productivity traits. Biologija, 3, 46--48.
Search in Google Scholar
Klimas, R., Klimienė, A., Rimkevičius, S. (2004). Changes in selection of purebred Lithuanian White pigs. Animal Breeding in the Baltics. Tartu, pp. 119--122.
Search in Google Scholar
Klimas, R., Klimienė, A., Rimkevičius, S. (2005). Fattening and carcass traits of Lithuanian White pigs with different part of English Large White blood. Proceedings of the 11^th Baltic Animal Breeding and Genetics Conference. Palanga, pp. 93--96.
Search in Google Scholar
Klimienė, A., Klimas, R. (2001). The leanness of pigs raised in Lithuania. Proceedings of the 7^th Baltic Animal Breeding Conference. Tartu, pp. 109--113.
Search in Google Scholar
Kolstad, K. (2000). Fat deposition and distribution in three genetic lines of pigs from 10 to 105 kg liveweight. In: Quality of meat and fat in pigs as affected by genetics and nutrition. (pp. 199--202). Wenk, C., Fernandez, J.A., Dupuis, M. (eds.). Wageningen.
Search in Google Scholar
Makoveckas, R. (1986). Lietuvos baltosios kiaulės [Lithuanian White pigs]. Vilnius. 299 pp. (in Lithuanian).
Search in Google Scholar
Michalska, G., Nowachowicz, J., Bucek, T., Wasilewski, D. (2007). Fat and meat content of crossbred pigs came from reciprocal crossing of Polish Large White and Polish Landrace breed. Animal Science, 1, pp. 84--85.
Search in Google Scholar
Mikelėnas, A., Štuopytė, N. (2000). Kiaulių skerdienos kokybės ir ūkiškai naudingų požymių koreliacija [Correlation between carcass and farming quality of pigs]. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika, 11(33), 53--56. (in Lithuanian).
Search in Google Scholar
Nicholas, F.W. (1996). Selection within populations. In: Introduction to Veterinary Genetics. Oxford University Press, pp. 261--272.
Search in Google Scholar
Rekštys, V. (2006). Kiaulių veislininkystės apyskaita [Pig breeding records]. Baisogala. 58 pp. (in Lithuanian).
Search in Google Scholar
Somelar, E., Tänavots, A., Saveli, O., Eilart, K., Poldvere, A., Kaart, T. (2000). Prediction of meat traits of different pig breed combinations in Estonia. Proceedings of the 6^th Baltic Animal Breeding Conference. Jelgava, pp. 116--121.
Search in Google Scholar
Tänavots, A., Kaart, T., Saveli, O. (2002). Heritability and correlation of meat and fertility traits in pigs in Estonia. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika, 19(41), 106--108.
Search in Google Scholar
Tucker, L. A. (2003). Simplistic Statistics. A Basic Guide to the Statistical Analysis of Biological Data. UK, Welton Lincoln: Chalcomble Publications, 65 pp.
Search in Google Scholar
Vege, A., Berzina, Z., Paura, L., Jansone, M. (2000). Lean meat yield from pigs carcass measurements indices. Proceedings of the 6^th Baltic Animal Breeding Conference. Jelgava, pp.123--127.
Search in Google Scholar
Veide, Dz. (2002). Trait genetic trend--indicator of selection progress. Proceedings of the 8^th Baltic Animal Breeding and Genetics Conference. Kaunas, pp. 96.
Search in Google Scholar