Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Landscape Ecological Structure in the Eastern Part of the North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia Cover

Landscape Ecological Structure in the Eastern Part of the North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia

Open Access
|Aug 2008

References

  1. Nikodemus, O., Bell, S., Grīne, I., Liepiņš, I. (2005). The impact of economic, social and political factors on the landscape structure of the Vidzeme Uplands in Latvia., 70, 57-67.
  2. Oliver, C. D., Larson, B. C. (1996).2ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 520 pp.
  3. Pietrzak, M. (2002) Landschaftswandel in Polen in der Vergangenen 200 und letzten 10 Jahren Dargestellt am Beispiel Mittelgroāpolens. In Bastian, O. et al.(pp. 80-81). Dresden.
  4. Simmering, D., Waldhardt, R., Otte, A. (2006). Quantifying determinants contributing to plant species richness in mosaic landscapes: A single- and multi-patch perspective., 21, 1233-1251.
  5. Angelstam, P., Bērmanis, R., Ek, T., Šica, L. (2006).Riga: State forest service. 100 pp.
  6. Angelstam, P., Kuuluvainen, T. (2004). Boreal forest disturbance regimes, successional dynamics and landscape monitoring: A European perspective., 51, 117-136.
  7. Drapeau, P., Leduc, A., Giroux, J. F., Savard, J. P. L., Bergeran, Y., Vickery, W. (2000). Landscape-scale disturbances and changes in bird communities of boreal mixed-wood forests., 70(3), 423-444.
  8. Fitzsimmons, M. (2003 Effects of deforestation and reforestation on landscape spatial structure in boreal Saskatchewan, Canada., 174, 577-592.
  9. Forman, R. T. T., Godron, M. (1986).NewYork: John Wiley&Sons. 619 pp.
  10. Franklin, A. B., Noan, B. R., George, L. (2002) What is habitat fragmentation?, 25, 20-29.
  11. Freeman, R. E., Stanley, E. H., Turner, M. G. (2003) Analysis and conservation implications of landscape change in the Wisconsin River floodplain., 13(2), 416-431.
  12. Gutko, Ž., Brūmelis, G., Liepiņš, I., Nikodemus, O., Tabors, G. (2001). Floristic diversity, richness and evenness during secondary succession on abandoned agricultural land in Latvia., 55(1), 35-42.
  13. Hanski, I., (1998). Metalopulation dynamics., 396, 41-49.
  14. Johnson, E. A. (1992).Cambridge University Press, p. 129.
  15. Jordán, F., Báldi, A., Orci, K.-M., Rácz, I., Varga, Z. (2003). Characterizing the importance of habitat patches and corridors in maintaining the landscape connectivity of a Pholidoptera transsylvanica (Orthoptera) metapopulation., 18, 83-92.
  16. Keišs, O. (2005). Impact of changes in agricultural land use on the corncrakepopulation in Latvia., 691, 93-109.
  17. McGarigal, K., Marks, B. J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General. Technical Report PNW-351. 141 pp
  18. Waldhardt, R., Simmering, D., Otte, A. (2004). Estimation and prediction of plant species richness in a mosaic landscape., 19, 211-226.
  19. Wu, J. (2004). Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: Scaling relations., 19, 125-138.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10046-008-0012-3 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X (formerly 1407-009X) | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 70
Published on: Aug 14, 2008
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2008 Aivars Tērauds, Oļgerts Nikodemus, Inga Rasa, Simons Bells, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.