Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Potential Impact of Climate Change on Aquatic Vegetation of River Salaca, Latvia Cover

Potential Impact of Climate Change on Aquatic Vegetation of River Salaca, Latvia

Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.
Volume 62 (2008): Issue 1-2 (April 2008)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Aug 2008
References

References

  1. Sarbu, A., Janauer, G., Exler, N., Filzmoser, P. (2006). The aquatic vegetation of large Danube river branches in Romania. In(pp. 101-106). Vienna.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Schneider, S., Melzer, A. (2003). The trophic index of macrophytes (TIM)—a new tool for indicating the trophic state of running waters., 88, 49-67.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Scott, W. A., Adamson, J. K., Rollinson, J., Parr, T. W. (2002). Monitoring of aquatic macrophytes for detection of long-term change in river systems., 73, 131-153.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Abou-Hamdan, H., Haury, J., Hebrard, J. P., Dandelot, S., Cazaubon, A. (2005). Macrophytic communities inhabiting the Huveaune (South-East France), a river subject to natural and anthropic disturbances., 551, 161-170.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Burnett, D. A., Champion, P. D., Clayton, J. S., Ogden J. (2007). A system for investigation of the temperature responses of emergent aquatic plants., 86(2), 187-190.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, P. A., Prepas, E. E., Hamilton, H. R., Bothwell, M. L. (1991). Current velocity and its effect on aquatic macrophytes in flowing waters., 1(3), 249-257.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Chambers, P. A., DeWreede, R. E., Irlandi, E. A., Vandermeulen, H. (1999). Management issues in aquatic macrophyte ecology: A Canadian perspective.77, 471-487.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Cimdiņš, P., Druvietis, I., Liepa, R., Parele, E., Urtāne, L., Urtāns, A. (1995). A Latvian catalogue of indicator species of freshwater saprobity., No. 1/2, 122-133.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, S. J., Wharton G. (2001). Sediment nutrient characteristics and aquatic macrophytes in lowland English rivers., 266, 103-112.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Druvietis, I., Briede, A., Grinberga, L., Parele, E., Rodinovs, V., Springe, G. (2007). Long-term assessment of hydroecosystem of the River Salaca, North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve, Latvia. In(pp. 173-192). Riga: University of Latvia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Ellenberg, H., Weber, H. E., Düll, R. (1992). Zeigenwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa., 18, 1-258.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Georg, A., Janauer, Lanz, E., Filzmoser, P., Exler, N. (2006). Breg and Brigach, source streams of the Danube: Changes based on macrophyte surveys 1967, 1989, and 2004.(pp. 86-90). Austrian Committee DanubeResearch. Vienna.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Hearne, J. W., Armitage, P. D. (1993). Implications of the annual macrophyte growth cycle on habitat in rivers., 8, 313-322.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Jansons, V., Vagstad, N., Sudars, R., Deelstra, J., Dzalbe, I., Kirsteina, D. (2002). Nutrient losses from point and diffuse agricultural sources in Latvia., 1(52), 9-17.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Kankaala, P., Ojala, A., Tulonen, T., Haapamaki, J., Arvola, L. (2000). Response of littoral vegetation on climate warming in the boreal zone: An experimental simulation., 34, 433-444.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Lacoul, P., Freedman, B. (2006). Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems.14(2), 89-136.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Madsen, T. V., Brix, H. (1997). Growth, photosynthesis and acclimation by two submerged macrophytes in relation to temperature.110, 320-327.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. McKee, J., Richards, A. J. (1996). Variation in seed production and germinability in common reed () in Britain and France with respect to climate.133, 233-243.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Melzer, A. (1999). Aquatic macrophytes as tools for lake management., 395/396, 181-190.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Middlekoop, H. (2000).Lelystad: Lelystad: RIZA (Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment). 156 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Sand-Jensen, K. (1998). Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near bed flow in lowland streams., 39(4), 663-679.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Sand-Jensen, K., Pedersen, O. (1999). Velocity gradients and turbulence around macrophyte stands in streems., 42(2), 315-328.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Vereecken, H., Baetens, J., Viaene, P., Mostaert, F., Meire, P. (2006). Ecological management of aquatic plants: Effects in lowland streams., 570, 205-210.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Аноним (1975).[Methods of investigation on inland waters] Москва: Наука, с. 17-132.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Уртанс, А. В. (1989). Структура и распределение высшей водной растителности в р. Салаца [Structure and distribution of aquatic plants in the River Salaca]. В книге:. Рига, Зинатне, с. 163-182 (in Russian).
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10046-008-0011-4 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X (formerly 1407-009X) | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 34 - 39
Published on: Aug 14, 2008
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
aquatic vegetation,
River Salaca,
climate change,
Latvia
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
General mathematics

© 2008 Laura Grīnberga, Gunta Spriņge, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 62 (2008): Issue 1-2 (April 2008)
Previous article
Next article