References
- Bauls, A., Krišjāne, Z. (2002). Latvian regional differences in the migration processes. Folia Geographica, 10, 55-63. (in Latvian)
- Bauls, A., Krišjāne, Z., Mežciema, G. (2003). Evalution of the urban environment in the different parts of Rīga. Folia Geographica, 11, 79-95 (in Latvian).
- Berry, B. J. L. (ed.) (1976). Urbanization and Counterurbanization. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. 329 pp.
- Boren, T., Gentile, M. (2007). Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler, 89 B (2), 95-110.
- Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (2006). Demography. Collection of statistical data. Riga. 140 pp.
- Champion, A. G. (1989). Introduction: The counterurbanization experience. In Champion, A. G. (ed.). Counterurbanization: The Changing Pace and Nature of Population Deconcentration (pp. 1-18). London: Edward Arnold.
- Chipeniuk, R. (2004). Planning for amenity migration in Canada. Mountain Research and Development, 24(4), 327-335.
- Clark, E. D., Cosgrove, C. J. (1991). Amenities versus labor market opportunities: Choosing the optimal distance to move. J. Regional Sci., 31(3), 311-328.
- Dahms, F. A., McComb, J. (1999). ‘Counterurbanization’, interaction and functional change in a rural amenity area—a Canadian example. J. Rural Studies, 15(2), 129-146.
- Eglīte, P. (1992). Iedzīvotāju kvalitātes izpētes aizsākums [Beginnings of research on population quality]. Latvijas Zinātņu Akadēmijas Vēstis, A daļa, 6, 11-19 (in Latvian).
- Ferguson, M., Ali, K., Olfert, M. R., D., Partridge, M. (2007). Voting with their feet: Jobs versus amenities. Growth and Changes, 38(1), 77-110.
- Findlay, A., Rogerson, R. (1993). Migration, places and quality of life: Voting with their feet. In Champion, T. (ed). Population Matters, The Local Dimension (pp. 34-49). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
- Fisher, T. (2003). Differentiation of growth processes in the peri-urban region: An Australian case study. Urban Studies 40(3), 551-565.
- Ford, T. (1999). Understanding population growth in the peri-urban region. Int. J. Popul. Geogr., 5, 297-311.
- Frey, W. H. (1988). Migration and metropolitan decline in developed countries: A comparative study. Popul. Devel. Rev., 14(4), 595-628.
- Glorioso, R. S. (2000). Amenity migration in the Sumava Bioregion, Czech Republic: Implications for ecological integrity. In Godde, P. M., Price, M. F., Zimmerman, F. M. (eds.). Tourism and Development in Mountain Regions (pp. 275-295). Oxford: CABI Publishing.
- Glorioso, R. S., Moss, L. A. G. (2007). Amenity migration to mountain regions: Current knowledge and a strategic construct for sustainable management. Social Change, 37(3), 137-161.
- Graves, P. E., Linneman, P. D. (1979). Household migration: Theoretical and empirical Results. J. Urban Econ., 6, 383-404.
- Greenwood, J. M., Hunt, L. G. (1989). Jobs versus amenities in the analysis of metropolitan migration. J. Urban Econ., 25, 1-16.
- Jobes, P. C. (2000). Moving nearer to heaven: The illusions and disillusions of migrants to scenic rural places. London: Praeger. 256 pp.
- Krisjane, Z. (2000). The Quality of Life, Environmental and Human Health Assessment in Latvia. In Owsinski, J., Johansson, M. (eds.). Global-Local Interplay in the Baltic Sea Region. Papers from the 5th International Nordic-Baltic Conference (pp. 422-432). Warsaw: The Interfaces Institute.
- Krišjāne, Z., Eglīte, P., Bauls A, Lulle, A., Bērziņš, M., Brants, M., Cunska, Z., Gņedovska, I., Ivbulis, B., Kaņējeva, G., Kristaps, G., Krūzmētra, Ž., Kūle, L., Markausa, I. M., Niklass, M., Pavlina, I., Titova, N., Vanaga, S., Vilciņš, A., Zariņa, I. B. (2007) Darbaspēka geogrāfiskā mobilitāte [The Geographic Mobility of the Labour Force]. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte. 240 lpp. (in Latvian).
- Krišjāne, Z., Bauls, A. (2005). Migrācijas regionālās iezīmes Latvijā [Regional features of migration in Latvia]. Demogrāfiskā situācija šodien un rīt. Stratēgiskās analīzes komisija. Zinātniski pētnieciskie raksti 3(4), 130-149 (in Latvian).
- Krišjāne, Z., Bauls, A. (2007). Migrācijas plūsmu regionālās iezīmes Latvijā [Regional features of migration flows in Latvia]. Paaudžu nomaiņa un migrācija Latvijā. Stratēgiskās analīzes komisija. Zinātniski pētnieciskie raksti, 4(15), 130-143 (in Latvian).
- Krupka, J. D. (2004). Location-specific Human Capital, Migration and Amenities. Georgia State University: Urban and Regional Analysis Group. 45 pp.
- Kulu, H., Billari, F. C. (2004) Multilevel analysis of internal migration in a transitional country: The case of Estonia. Regional Studies, 38(6), 679-696.
- Lessinger, J. (1991). Penturbia. WA: Socio-Economic, Seattle. 340 pp.
- Lewis, G. (2000). Changing places in a rural world: The population turnaround in perspective. Geography, 85(2), 157-165.
- Ott, T. (2001) From concentration to de-concentration—migration patterns in the post-socialist city. Cities, 18(6), 403-412.
- Ourednicek, M. (2007). Differential suburban development in Prague urban region. Geografiska Annaler, 89 B(2), 111-126.
- Portnov, B. (2001). Employment—Housing paradigm of internal migration: Evidence from Norway. Int. Migration, 39(2), 93-117.
- Richardson, H. (1973) Regional Growth Theory. Macmillian Basingstoke, Lodon. 264 pp.
- Roback, J. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life. J. Polit. Econ., 90(6), 57-78.
- Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ., 82(1), 34-55.
- Rudzitis, G. (1996). Wilderness and the Changing West. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 240 pp.
- Rudzitis, G. (1999). Amenities increasingly draw people to the rural west. Rural Devel. Persp., 14(2), 9-14.
- Stockdale, A., Findlay, A., Short, D. (2000) The repopulation of rural Scotland and threat. J. Rural Studies, 16, 243-257.
- Sykora, L., Novak, J. (2007). A city in motion: Time-space activity and mobility patterns of suburban inhabitants and the structuration of the spatial organization of Prague metropolitan area. Geografiska Annaler, 89 B(2), 147-167.
- Tammaru, T. (2005). Suburbanisation, employment change, and commuting in the Tallinn metropolitan area. Environ. Plan., 37 A, 1669-1687.
- Ullman, E. L. (1954). Amenities as a factor in regional growth. Geogr. Rev., 44, 119-132.
- Vaskis, E. (ed.) (2001). Living conditions in Latvia. Rīga: LR CSP, FAFO. 237 pp.
- Vining, D. R., Kontuly, T. (1978). Population dispersal from major metropolitan regions: An international comparison. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev., 3(1), 49-73.
- Lundholm, E. (2006). Are movers still the same? Characteristics of interegional migration in Sweden 1970-2001. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(3), 336-348.
- Markausa, I.-M. (1997). Dzīvesvietas pievilcības vērtējums un iespējamā migrācija Latvijas iedzīvotāju skatījumā [Attractivity of the actual place of residence and intentions to change it]. In Demogrāfiskā situācija Latvijas laukos un iekšējā migrācija 90-to gadu pirmajā pusē. Apcerējumi par Latvijas iedzīvotājiem. Nr. 1. Rīga: LZA Ekonomikas institūts, pp. 64-81 (in Latvian).
- Moss, L. A. G. (2006). The amenity migrants: Ecological challenge to contemporary Shangri-La. In Moss, L. A. G. (ed.), Amenity Migrants: Seeking and Sustaining Mountains and Their Cultures (pp. 3-26). Wallingford, Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing.
- Niedomysl, T. (2006). Migration and place attractiveness. Geografiska Regionstudier, 68, 46 pp.
- Halliday, J., Coombest, M. (1995). In search of counterurbanisation: Some evidence from Devon on the relationship between patterns of migration and motivation. J. Rural Studies, 11(4), 433-446.
- Hazans, M. (2003). Determinants of inter-regional migration in the Baltic countries. In: 43rd Congress of European Regional Science Association, 27-30 August 2003, Jyväskylä, Finland, pp. 1-23.