Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Amenity Migration in Postsocialist Metropolis: The Case of Rīga Agglomeration Cover

Amenity Migration in Postsocialist Metropolis: The Case of Rīga Agglomeration

Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.
Volume 62 (2008): Issue 1-2 (April 2008)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Aug 2008
References

References

  1. Bauls, A., Krišjāne, Z. (2002). Latvian regional differences in the migration processes., 10, 55-63. (in Latvian)
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bauls, A., Krišjāne, Z., Mežciema, G. (2003). Evalution of the urban environment in the different parts of Rīga., 11, 79-95 (in Latvian).
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Berry, B. J. L. (ed.) (1976).Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. 329 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Boren, T., Gentile, M. (2007). Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: An introduction., 89 B (2), 95-110.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (2006).Collection of statistical data. Riga. 140 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Champion, A. G. (1989). Introduction: The counterurbanization experience. In Champion, A. G. (ed.).(pp. 1-18). London: Edward Arnold.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Chipeniuk, R. (2004). Planning for amenity migration in Canada., 24(4), 327-335.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Clark, E. D., Cosgrove, C. J. (1991). Amenities versus labor market opportunities: Choosing the optimal distance to move., 31(3), 311-328.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Dahms, F. A., McComb, J. (1999). ‘Counterurbanization’, interaction and functional change in a rural amenity area—a Canadian example., 15(2), 129-146.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Eglīte, P. (1992). Iedzīvotāju kvalitātes izpētes aizsākums [Beginnings of research on population quality]., 6, 11-19 (in Latvian).
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Ferguson, M., Ali, K., Olfert, M. R., D., Partridge, M. (2007). Voting with their feet: Jobs versus amenities., 38(1), 77-110.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Findlay, A., Rogerson, R. (1993). Migration, places and quality of life: Voting with their feet. In Champion, T. (ed).(pp. 34-49). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, T. (2003). Differentiation of growth processes in the peri-urban region: An Australian case study.40(3), 551-565.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Ford, T. (1999). Understanding population growth in the peri-urban region., 5, 297-311.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Frey, W. H. (1988). Migration and metropolitan decline in developed countries: A comparative study., 14(4), 595-628.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Glorioso, R. S. (2000). Amenity migration in the Sumava Bioregion, Czech Republic: Implications for ecological integrity. In Godde, P. M., Price, M. F., Zimmerman, F. M. (eds.).(pp. 275-295). Oxford: CABI Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Glorioso, R. S., Moss, L. A. G. (2007). Amenity migration to mountain regions: Current knowledge and a strategic construct for sustainable management., 37(3), 137-161.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Graves, P. E., Linneman, P. D. (1979). Household migration: Theoretical and empirical Results., 6, 383-404.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Greenwood, J. M., Hunt, L. G. (1989). Jobs versus amenities in the analysis of metropolitan migration., 25, 1-16.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Jobes, P. C. (2000).London: Praeger. 256 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Krisjane, Z. (2000). The Quality of Life, Environmental and Human Health Assessment in Latvia. In Owsinski, J., Johansson, M. (eds.).(pp. 422-432). Warsaw: The Interfaces Institute.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Krišjāne, Z., Eglīte, P., Bauls A, Lulle, A., Bērziņš, M., Brants, M., Cunska, Z., Gņedovska, I., Ivbulis, B., Kaņējeva, G., Kristaps, G., Krūzmētra, Ž., Kūle, L., Markausa, I. M., Niklass, M., Pavlina, I., Titova, N., Vanaga, S., Vilciņš, A., Zariņa, I. B. (2007)[The Geographic Mobility of the Labour Force]. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte. 240 lpp. (in Latvian).
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Krišjāne, Z., Bauls, A. (2005). Migrācijas regionālās iezīmes Latvijā [Regional features of migration in Latvia]. Demogrāfiskā situācija šodien un rīt. Stratēgiskās analīzes komisija.3(4), 130-149 (in Latvian).
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Krišjāne, Z., Bauls, A. (2007). Migrācijas plūsmu regionālās iezīmes Latvijā [Regional features of migration flows in Latvia]. Paaudžu nomaiņa un migrācija Latvijā. Stratēgiskās analīzes komisija., 4(15), 130-143 (in Latvian).
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Krupka, J. D. (2004).Georgia State University: Urban and Regional Analysis Group. 45 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Kulu, H., Billari, F. C. (2004) Multilevel analysis of internal migration in a transitional country: The case of Estonia., 38(6), 679-696.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Lessinger, J. (1991).WA: Socio-Economic, Seattle. 340 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Lewis, G. (2000). Changing places in a rural world: The population turnaround in perspective., 85(2), 157-165.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Ott, T. (2001) From concentration to de-concentration—migration patterns in the post-socialist city., 18(6), 403-412.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Ourednicek, M. (2007). Differential suburban development in Prague urban region., 89 B(2), 111-126.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Portnov, B. (2001). Employment—Housing paradigm of internal migration: Evidence from Norway., 39(2), 93-117.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Richardson, H. (1973)Macmillian Basingstoke, Lodon. 264 pp.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Roback, J. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life., 90(6), 57-78.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition., 82(1), 34-55.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Rudzitis, G. (1996).New York: John Wiley & Sons. 240 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Rudzitis, G. (1999). Amenities increasingly draw people to the rural west., 14(2), 9-14.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Stockdale, A., Findlay, A., Short, D. (2000) The repopulation of rural Scotland and threat., 16, 243-257.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Sykora, L., Novak, J. (2007). A city in motion: Time-space activity and mobility patterns of suburban inhabitants and the structuration of the spatial organization of Prague metropolitan area., 89 B(2), 147-167.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Tammaru, T. (2005). Suburbanisation, employment change, and commuting in the Tallinn metropolitan area., 37 A, 1669-1687.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Ullman, E. L. (1954). Amenities as a factor in regional growth., 44, 119-132.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Vaskis, E. (ed.) (2001).Rīga: LR CSP, FAFO. 237 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Vining, D. R., Kontuly, T. (1978). Population dispersal from major metropolitan regions: An international comparison., 3(1), 49-73.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Lundholm, E. (2006). Are movers still the same? Characteristics of interegional migration in Sweden 1970-2001., 98(3), 336-348.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Markausa, I.-M. (1997). Dzīvesvietas pievilcības vērtējums un iespējamā migrācija Latvijas iedzīvotāju skatījumā [Attractivity of the actual place of residence and intentions to change it]. InNr. 1. Rīga: LZA Ekonomikas institūts, pp. 64-81 (in Latvian).
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Moss, L. A. G. (2006). The amenity migrants: Ecological challenge to contemporary Shangri-La. In Moss, L. A. G. (ed.),(pp. 3-26). Wallingford, Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Niedomysl, T. (2006). Migration and place attractiveness., 68, 46 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Halliday, J., Coombest, M. (1995). In search of counterurbanisation: Some evidence from Devon on the relationship between patterns of migration and motivation., 11(4), 433-446.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Hazans, M. (2003). Determinants of inter-regional migration in the Baltic countries. In:, 27-30 August 2003, Jyväskylä, Finland, pp. 1-23.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10046-008-0006-1 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X (formerly 1407-009X) | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 71 - 77
Published on: Aug 14, 2008
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
environmental amenities,
deconcentration,
migration,
quality of life,
agglomeration
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
General mathematics

© 2008 Māris Bērziņš, Zaiga Krišjāne, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 62 (2008): Issue 1-2 (April 2008)
Previous article
Next article