Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Invasive Non-Native Solidago Species in Latvia: Expansion History and Current Distribution Cover

Invasive Non-Native Solidago Species in Latvia: Expansion History and Current Distribution

By:   
Open Access
|Aug 2008

References

  1. Anonīms (2004).[Monitoring of grasslands and agricultural lands]. Rīga: Latvijas Dabas fonds, 30.-33. lpp. (in Latvian).
  2. Anonīms (2006).[Nature Conservancy Area "Krēmeri": Plan for Nature Protection]. Rīga: Grupa 93, 26 lpp. (in Latvian).
  3. Anonīms (2007).[Nature conservancy area "Ilgas": Nature protection plan]. Rīga: Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian Environment. 31 lpp. (in Latvian).
  4. Bickis, J., Rasiņš, A. (1946).[Key of Latvian Plants]. Rīga: Latvijas Valsts izdevniecība. 343 lpp. (in Latvian).
  5. Cornelius, R. (1990). The strategies ofL. in relation to urban habitats. III. Conformity to habitat dynamics., 11(3), 301-310.
  6. Dancza, I., Botta-Dukát, Z. (2001). Historical and recent data on the distribution of North Americanspecies (Ait. andL.) in Hungary. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Ecology and Management of Alien Plant Invasions, 12-15 September 2001, Loughborough University, UK. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/research/cens/invasives/6emapi_oral_abs.htm [cited in 1 Nov 2007].
  7. Forman, J. (2003). The introduction of American plant species into Europe: issues and consequences. In Child, L. E., Brock, J. H., Brundu, G., Prach, K., Pyšek, P., Wade, P. M., Williamson, M. (eds.).(pp. 17-39). Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
  8. Gassman, A., Weber, E. (2005).In Wittenberg, R. (ed.).CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre report to the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape (pp. 413-414). Delemont.
  9. Guzikowa, M., Maycock, P. F. (1986). The invasion and expansion of three North American species of goldenrod (L.Ait.(L.) Salisb.) in Poland., 55, 367-384.
  10. Güsewell, S., Jakobs, G., Weber, E. (2006). Native and introduced populations ofdiffer in shoot production but not in leaf traits or litter decomposition., 20, 575-584.
  11. Harnett, D. C., Bazzaz, F. A. (1983). Physiological integration among interclonal ramets in, 64(4), 779-788.
  12. Henderson, S., Dawson, T. P., Whittaker, R. J. (2006) Progress in invasive plants research., 30(1), 25-46.
  13. Hodkinson, D. J., Thompson, K. (1997). Plant dispersal: The role of man., 34, 1484-1496.
  14. Ieviņa, S. (1964). Ziemciešu puķu asortimenta dinamika Latvijas PSR teritorijā laikā no 1805. līdz 1940. gadam [Dynamics of wintergreen assortment in the Latvian SSR in a period from 1805 to 1940]. In5 (129.-146. lpp). Rīga: Latvijas PSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība (in Latvian).
  15. Jakobs, G., Weber, E., Edwards, P. J. (2004). Introduced plants of the invasive(Asteraceae) are larger and grow denser than conspecifics in the native range., 10, 11-19.
  16. Lacey, W. S. (1957). A comparison of the spread ofandin Britain. In Lousley, J. E. (Ed.)(pp. 109-115). London: Botanical Society of the British Isles.
  17. Lohmeyer, W., Sukopp, H. (1992). Agriophyten in der Vegetation Mitteleuropas., 25, 1-185.
  18. Mack, R. N. (2000). Assessing the extent, status and dynamism of plant invasions: Current and emerging approaches. In Mooney, H. A, Hobbs, R. J. (eds.).(pp. 141-168). Washington D. C.: Island Press.
  19. Mandák, B., Pyðek, P., Bímová, K. (2004). History of the invasion and distribution oftaxa in the Czech Republic: A hybrid spreading faster than its parents.(Prague) 76, 15-64.
  20. Müller, N., Okuda, S. (1998). Invasion of alien plants in floodplains—a comparison of Europe and Japan. In Starfinger, U., Ewards, K., Kowarik, I., Williamson, M. (eds.)(pp. 321-332). Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
  21. Pētersone, A. (1959). Kurvjziežu dzimta -(Vaill.) Adans. [Daisy family -(Vaill.) Adans.] In Galenieks, P. (ed.),4. sēj. (410-411. lpp.). Rīga: Latvijas Valsts izdevniecība, (in Latvian).
  22. Pyšek, P., Prach, K. (1995). Invasion dynamics of—a century of spreading reconstructed., 74, 41-18.
  23. Pyšek, P., Sádlo, J., Mandák, B. (2002). Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic.(Prague), 74, 97-186.
  24. Tokarska-Guzik, B. (2003). The expansion of some alien plant species (neophytes) in Poland. In Child, L. E., Brock, J. H., Prach, K., Pyšek, P., Wade, P. M., Williamson, M. (eds.)(pp. 147-167). Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
  25. Walck, J. L., Baskin, J. M., Baskin, C. C. (1999). Relative competitive abilities and growth characteristics of a narrowly endemic and geographically widespreadspecies (Asteraceae)., 86(6), 820-828.
  26. Weber, E. (1998). The dynamics of plant invasions: A case study of three exotic goldenrod species (L.) in Europe., 25, 147-154.
  27. Weber, E. (2000). Biological flora of Central Europe:L., 195, 123-134.
  28. Weber, E. (2001). Current and potential ranges of three exotic goldenrods () in Europe., 15(1), 122-128.
  29. Weber, E., Schmid, B. (1998). Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of(Asteraceae) introduced into Europe., 85(8), 1110-1121.
  30. Weber, E., Jakobs, G. (2005). Biological flora of Central Europe:Aiton., 200, 109-118.
  31. Табака, Л., Гаврилова, Г., Фатаре, И. (1988).[Vascular flora of the Latvian SSR]. Рига, Зинатне, 194 с. (in Russian).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10046-008-0003-4 | Journal eISSN: 2255-890X (formerly 1407-009X) | Journal ISSN: 1407-009X
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 83
Published on: Aug 14, 2008
Published by: Latvian Academy of Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2008 Agnese Priede, published by Latvian Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.