Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Innovation Propensity in Croatian Enterprises: Results of a Community Innovation Survey Cover

Innovation Propensity in Croatian Enterprises: Results of a Community Innovation Survey

South East European Journal of Economics and Business
Volume 3 (2008): Issue 1 (April 2008)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Apr 2008
References

References

  1. Aitken, B.J. and A.E. Harrison, 1999. Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investments? Evidence from Venezuela.89: 605-618.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Andrijević-Matovac, V. 2003. Croatian National Innovation System: How to create and transfer knowledge and technology? In Transition Countries in the Knowledge Society, edited by J. Švarc, J. Lažnjak, Ž. Šporer, and D. Polšek, 199-217. The Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar, Zagreb.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Aralica, Z. and Bačić, K. 2005. Evaluation of Croatian innovation capability. In Croatian Accession to the European Union, Facing the Challenges of Negotiations, edited by K. Ott, 129-159. The Institute of Public Finance, Zagreb.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Arrow, K. J. 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing.29: 155-173.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Arvanitis, S. 1997. The Impact of Firm Size on Innovative Activity - An Empirical
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Analysis Based on Swiss Firm Data.9: 473-490.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin, J. Hanel, P. and Sabourin, D. 2000. Determinants of Innovative Activity in Canadian Manufacturing Firms: The Role of Intellectual Property Rights. Ottawa, Micro-Economic Analysis Division Statistics Canada.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Baumol, J.W. 2004. Entrepreneurial Enterprises, Large Established Firms and Other Components of the Free-Market Growth Machine., 23 (1): 9-21.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Boia, M. J. Conceição, P. and Santos, R. 2003. Determinants of Innovation in Portugal: Designing, Implementing and Analyzing Evidence from the Third Community Innovation Survey. Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Božić, Lj. Radas, S. 2005. The Effects of Innovation Activities in SME's in the Republic of Croatia.15 (103): 30-50.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Caird, S. 1994. How important is the innovator for the commercial success of innovative products in SMEs.14 (2): 71-83.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. CEU 2000. Presidency conclusions: Lisbon European Council 2000. Bruxelles, Council of European Union.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, W. 2005. Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity. In Economics of Innovation and Technological Change Handbook, edited by P. Stoneman, 182-264. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. 2000. Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). NBER Working Paper 7552, MS: Cambridge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Cohen W. M. Klepper S 1992. The anatomy ofindustry R&D intensity distributions.82: 777-799.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D.99: 569-596.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Crépon, B., Duguet, E. and Mairesse, J. 1998. Research and Development, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level.7: 115-158.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Crespi, M. 2004. Notes on the Determinants of Innovation: A Multi-perspective Analysis. Rome, FEEM Working Paper No. 42/04.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Damijan, et al. 2003. Technology Transfer through FDI in Top-10 Transition Countries: How Important are Direct Effects, Horizontal and Vertical Spillovers? MI: Ann Arbor, William Davidson Institute working paper, no.549.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Dosi. G. 1988. Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation.26: 1120-1171.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Geroski, P. A. and Walters, C. F. 1995. Innovative Activities over the Business Cycle.105: 916-928.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Girma, S., Greenaway, D. and Wakelin, K. 2001. Who Benefits from Foreign Direct Investment in the UK?48: 119-133.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., Peters, B. 2006. Innovation and Productivity Across four European Countries.22, 4: 483-498.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators:28: 1661-1707.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Hausman, A., 2005. Innovativeness among small businesses: Theory and propositions for future research.34 (8): 773-782.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Hujer, R. and Radić, D. 2003. Evaluating the Impacts of Subsidies on Innovation Activities in Germany. Frankfurt, Discussion Paper, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Jaklič, A., Rojec M. and Damijan, J. 2006. Innovation Cooperation and Innovation Activity of Slovenian Enterprises. Paper presented at 32th Annual Conference of European International Business Association (EIBA): Regional and National Drivers of Business Location and Competitiveness, Fribourg, November.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Kickul, J. and Gundry, L. 2002. Prospecting for strategic advantage: the proactive entrepreneurial personality and small firm innovation., 40 (2): 85-97.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Kuhlmann, S. 2001. Governance of Innovation Policy in Europe - Three Scenarios. In Innovation Policy in Europe and the US: New Policies in New Institutions, Research Policy - Special Issue 30 6: 953-976.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Kurik, S. et al. 2002. Innovation in Estonian Enterprises 1998-2000. Estonian Institute for Futures Studies, Talinn.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Leiponen, A., 2005. Skill and innovation.23: 303-323.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Lipparini, A. and Sobrero, M., 1994. The glue and the pieces: Entrepreneurship and innovation in small-firm networks., 9 (2): 125-40.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Lööf, H. Heshmati, A. 2006. On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis.15: 317-344.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Lundwall, B.Ä. 1992. National system of innovations: Towards theory of innovation and interactive learning. Printer Publisher, London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Maddala, G. S. 1986. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Mairesse, J. and Mohnen, P. 2001. To Be or Not To Be Innovative: An Exercise in Measurement. Cambridge, MS: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Working Papers 8644. http://edocs.ub.unimaas.nl/loader/file.asp?id=243 (accessed September 9, 2007)
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Mohnen, P. and Dagenais, M. 2000. Towards an Innovation Intensity Index: The Case of CIS 1 in Denmark and Ireland. Montreal, CIRANO. http://www.cirano.qc.ca/pdf/publication/2000s-20.pdf (accessed January 22, 2007)
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Mowery, D. C. and Rosenberg, N. 1989. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Narula, R. 2003. Understanding the growth of international R&D alliances. In Multinational
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Enterprises, Innovative Strategies and Systems of Innovation, edited by J. Cantwell and J. Molero, 129-152. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. NCC 2006. Croatia's Competitiveness Challenge: Annual Report on Croatia Competitiveness 2006. National Competitiveness Council, Zagreb.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. OECD 1997. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data - Oslo Manual 2edition. OECD, Paris.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 2005. Patterns of Technological Activity: their Measurement and Interpretation. In Economics of Innovation and Technological Change Handbook, edited by P. Stoneman, 182-264. Oxford Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Pavitt, K. 1984. Patterns of Technical Change: Towards Taxonomy and a Theory.13(6): 343-73.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Pavitt, K. 1986. Technology, Innovation and Strategic Management. In: Strategic Management Research: A European Perspective, edited by: J. Mc Gee and H. Tomas, 171-190. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Powell, W.W., Grodal, S. 2005. Networks of Innovators. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by J. Fegerberg, D.C. Mowery and R.R. Nelson, 56-85. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Račić, D. et al. 2005. Innovation in Croatian Enterprises. The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Račić, D. and Cvijanović, V. 2005. Privatization, Institution Building and Market Development: The Case of Croatia. In Path-depedent development in the Western Balkans: the impact of privatization, edited by S. Kusic, 43-77. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Radić, D. 2005. Econometric Analysis of Innovation Activities. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Radošević, S. 2004. A Two-tier or Multi-tier Europe? Assessing the Innovation Capacities of Central and Eastern European Countries in the Enlarged EU.42(3): 641-666.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Radosevic, S. 1999. Patterns of Innovative Activities in Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: An Analysis Based on Comparison of Innovation Surveys. Sussex, SPRU Electronic Working Paper No 35.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Raymond, W. P. et al. 2006. Persistence of innovation in Dutch manufacturing: Is it spurious? Munich, CESifo Working Paper Series No 1681.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. Sanna-Randaccio, F., R. Veugelers 2003. Global innovation strategies of MNEs: Implications for host economies. In Multinational Enterprises, Innovative Strategies and Systems of Innovation, edited by J. Cantwell and J. Molero, 14-46. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Schmookler, J. 1962. Economic Sources of Inventive Activity.XXII (1): 1-20.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Szabo, A. 2002. Internationalisation of SMEs: The UNECE Approach. Geneva, UNECE.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Švarc, J. 2006. Socio-political factors and the failure of innovation policy in Croatia as a country in transition.35 (1): 144-159.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Teece, D. J. 1977. Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-how.87 (346): 242-261.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from Technological Innovation.15 (6): 285-306.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  60. Vinding, A. L. 2002. Absorptive capacity and innovative performance: A human capital approach. In Interorganisational Diffusion and Transformation of Knowledge in the Process of Product Innovation. Ph.D. dissertation, Institut for Erhvervsstudier, Ålborg Universitet.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10033-008-0008-6 | Journal eISSN: 2233-1999 | Journal ISSN: 1840-118X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 77 - 88
Published on: Apr 14, 2008
Published by: University of Sarajevo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
Innovation activities,
Community Innovation Survey,
Croatia
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Business management, other

© 2008 Zoran Aralica, Domagoj Račić, Dubravko Radić, published by University of Sarajevo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 3 (2008): Issue 1 (April 2008)
Previous article
Next article