Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Tomato Molecular Markers Cover

Tomato Molecular Markers

Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research
Volume 74 (2011): Issue 1 (June 2011)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Aug 2011
References

References

  1. Andrus C.F., Reynard G.B., Wade B.L. 1942. Relative resistance of tomato varieties, selections and crosses to defoliation byand. US Dep. Agric Circ. 652.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bai Y., Huang C-H., Van der Huist R., Meijer-Dekens F., Bonnema G., Lindhout P. 2003. QTLs for Tomato Powdery Mildew Resistance () inG1.1601 Colocalize with Two Qualitative Powdery Mildew Resistance Genes. MPMI 16(2): 169-176.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Ballvora A., Schornack S., Baker B. J., Ganal M., Bonas U., Lahaye B.J. 2001. Chromosome landing at the tomatolocus. Mol. Genet. Genomics 266: 639-645. [DOI: 10.1007/s004380100583]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Barillas A.C., Mejia L., Sanchez-Perez A., Maxwell D. 2008. CAPS and SCAR markers for detection ofgene introgresion for resistance tof. sp.race 3. TGC Reports 58: 11-17.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Barone A., Di Matteo A., Carputo D., Fruscinate L. 2009. High-throughput genomics enhances tomato breeding efficiency. Current Genomics 10: 1-9. [DOI: 10.2174/138920209787581226]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Barone A., Chiusano M.L., Ercolano M.R., Giuliano G., Grandillo S., Frusciante L. 2008. Structural and functional genomics of tomato. International Journal of Plant Genomics Volume 2008, Article ID 820274, p. 12. [DOI:10.1155/2008/820274]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Bashi E., Pilowski M., Rotem J. 1973. Resistance in tomatoes toandf. sp.Phytopathology 63: 1542-1544.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Beckmann J.S., Soller M. 1986. Restriction fragment length polymorphism in plant genetic improvement. Oxford Surveys of Plant Molecular and Cell Biology 3: 197-250.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Behare J., Laterrot H., Sarfatti M., Zamir D. 1991. RFLP mapping of theresistance gene in tomato. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 4: 489-492.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Bernatzky R. 1993. Genetic Mapping and Protein Product Diversity of the Self-Incompatibility Locus in Wild Tomato (). Biochemical Genetics. Vol. 31, 3-4: 173-184. [DOI: 10.1007/BF02399924]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Boyer J.S. 1982. Plant Productivity and environment. Science 218: 443-448. [DOI:10.1126/science.218.4571.443]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Butler L. 1936. Inherited characters in the tomato. J. Hered. 27: 25-26.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Cahill D. J., Schmidt D.H. 2004. Use of marker-assisted selection in a product development breeding program. In T. Fischer (ed.) New directions for a diverse planet. Proc. 4Int. Crop Sci. Congress, Brisbane, QLD, The Regional Institute Ltf. Gosford, NSW, Australia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Carland F.M., Staskawicz B.J. 1993. Genetic characterization of thelocus of tomato: semidominance and cosegregation of resistance topathovarand sensitivity to the insecticide fenthion. Molecular and General Genetics 239: 17-27. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00281596]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Castro A.P., Blanca J.M., Diez M.J., Vinals F.N. 2007. Identyfikation of a CAPS marker tighly linked to the Tomato yellow leaf curl disease resistance genein tomato. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 117: 47-356. [DOI: 10.1007/s10658-007-9103-2]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Causse M., Damidaus R., Rousselle 2007. Traditional and enhanced breeding for quality traits in tomato. Genetic improvement ofcrops. Tomato. Science Publisher 2: 153-192.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Causse M., Duffe P., Gomez M.C., Buret M., Damiadux R., Zamir D. et al. 2004. A genetic map of candidate genes and QTLs involved in tomato fruit size and composition. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55(403): 1671-1685. [DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erh207]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Ceccarelli S., Grando S. 1996. Drought as a challenge for the plant breeder. Plant Growth Regul. 20: 149-155. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00024011]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Chunwongse J., Bunn T.B., Crossman C., Jiang J., Tanksley S.D. 1994. Chromosomal localization and molecular-marker tagging of the powdery mildew resistance gene () in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 76-79. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00226986]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Cregan P.B., Mudge J., Fickus E.W., Danesh D., Denny R., Young N.D. 1999. Two simple sequence repeat markers to select for soybean cyst nematode resistance conditioned by thelocus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 811-818. [DOI: 10.1007/s001220051300]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Crosbie T.M., Eathington S.R., Johnson G.R., Edwards M., Reiter R., Stark S. et al. 2006. Plant breeding: Past, present, and future. p. 3-50. In K.R. Lamkey and M. Lee (ed.) Plant breeding: The Arnel R. Hallauer international symposium. Blackwell, Ames, IA. [DOI: 10.1002/9780470752708.ch1]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Davies J.N., Hobson G.E. 1981. The constituents of tomato fruit - The influence of environment, nutrition and genotype. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 15: 205-280. [DOI: 10.1080/10408398109527317]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Dickinson M.J., Jones D.A., Jones J.D.G. 1993. Close linkage between theandresistance loci in tomato. The American Phytopathology Society 6(3).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Diwan N., Fluhr R., Eshed Y., Zamir D., Tanksley S.D. 1999. Mapping ofin tomato: a gene conferring resistance to the broad-spectrum pathogen,race 1. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98(2): 315-319. [DOI: 10.1007/s001220051075]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Doidge E.M. 1921. A tomato canker. Ann Appl Biol. 7: 407-430. [DOI: 10. 1111/j.1744-7348.1921.tb05528.x]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Dudal R. 1976. Inventory of major soils of the world with special reference to mineral stress. Cornell Univ Agric Expt Stn., Ithaca.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Dwivedi S.L., Crouch J.H., Mackill D.J., Xu Y., Blair M.W., Ragot M., Upadhyaya H.D., Ortiz R. 2007. The molecularization of public sector crop breeding: Progress, problems, and prospects. Adv. Agron. 95: 163-318. [DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(07) 95003-8]
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Fazio G., Stevens M.R., Scott J.W. 1999. Identification of RAPD markers linked to fusarium crown and root rot resistance () in tomato. Euphytica 150: 205-210. [DOI: 10.1023/A:1003497719705]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Foolad M.R. 2007a. Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. International Journal of Plant Genomics 10: 1-52. [DOI: 10.1155/2007/64358]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Foolad M.R. 2007b. Tolerance to abiotic stresses. Genetic improvement ofcrops. Tomato, Science Publisher 2: 521-592.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Foolad M.R., Zhang L.P., Subbiah P. 2003. Genetics of drought tolerance during seed germination in tomato: inheritance and QTL mapping. Genome 46(4): 536-545.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Foolad M.R., Zhang L.P., Lin G.Y. 2001. Identification and validation of QTLs for salt tolerance during vegetative growth in tomato by selective genotyping. Genome 44(3).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Frary A., Xu Y. Liu, Mitchel J., Tedeschi S., Tanksley S.D. 2005. Development of a set of PCR-based anchor markers encompassing the tomato genome and evaluation of their usefulness for genetics and breeding experiments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111: 291-312. [DOI: 10.1007/s00122-005-2023-7]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Frary A., Fulton T.M., Zamir D., Tanksley S.D. 2004. Advanced backcross QTL analysis of axcross and identification of possible orthologs in the. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108(3): 485-496. [DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1422-x]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Ganal M.W., Simon R., Brommonschenkel S., Arndt M., Phillips M.S., Tanksley S.D., Kumar A. 1995. Genetic Mapping of a Wide Spectrum Nematode Resistance Gene () Againstin Tomato. MPMI 8(6): 886-891.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Garcia B.E., Mejía L., Salus M.S., Martin C.T., Seah S, Williamson V.M., Maxwell D.P. 2007. A co-dominant SCAR marker, Mi23, for detection of thegene for resistance to root-knot nematode in tomato germplasm.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Gilbert J.C., McQuire D.C. 1955. One major gene for resistance to sever galling from. Report of the tomato genetics cooperative 5: 15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Godzina M., Staniaszek M., Kiełkiewicz M. 2010. Relevance of the MI23 marker and the potato aphid as indicators of tomato plant (L.) resistance to some pest. Veget. Crops Res. Bull. Vol. 72: 25-33. [DOI: 10.2478/v10032-010-0003-1]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Grogan R.G., Kimble K.A., Misaghi I. 1975. A stern canker disease of tomato caused byf. sp.. Phytopathology 65: 880-886.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Hendrix J., Frazier W.A. 1949. Studies of the inheritance ofresistance in tomatoes. Hawaii Agric Exp Stn Tech Bull 8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Hanson P.M., Bernacchi D., Green S., Tanksley S.D., Muniyappa V., Padmaja A.S. et al. 2000. Mapping of a wild tomato introgression associated with tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance in a cultivated tomato line. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 125: 15-20.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Hanson P., Green S.K., Kuo G. 2006., a gene on chromosome 11 conditioning geminivirus resistance in tomato. TGC Reports 56: 22-25.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Hsiao T.C. 1973. Plant responses to water stress. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24: 519-570. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pp.24.060173.002511]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Huang C-C., Van De Putte P.M., Haanstra-Van Der Merr J.G., Meijer-Dekens F., Lindhout P. 2000. Characterization and mapping of resistance toin twoaccession: evidence for close linkage of two-genes on chromosome 6 of tomato. WILEY Heredity 85(6). [DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00770.x]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Ji Y., Scott J.W. 2006., a begomovirus resistance locus linked toon chromosome 6 of tomato. TGC Reports 56: 22-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Johnson G.R. 2004. Marker-assisted selection. Plant Breed. Rev. 24: 293-301. [DOI: 10.1002/9780470650240.ch13]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Kaloshian I., Lange W.H., Williamson V.M. 1995. An aphid-resistance locus is tightly linked to the nematode-resistance gene, Mi, in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92: 622-625.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Kabelka E., Franchino B.M., Francis D. 2002. Two loci fromLA407 confer resistance to strains ofsubsp.. Phytopathology 92(5): 504-510.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Kawchuk L.M., Hachey J., Lynch D.R. 1998. Development of sequence characterized DNA markers linked to a dominant verticillium wilt resistance gene in tomato. Genome 41(1): 91-95.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Lim G.T.T., Wang G.-P., Hemming M.N., Basuki S., McGrath D.J., Carroll B.J., Jones D.A. 2006. Mapping the I-3 gene for resistance for Fusarium wilt in tomato: application of anmarker in tomato improvement and progress towards the cloning of. Australasian Plant Pathology 35(6) 671-680. [DOI: 10.1071/AP06073]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. Masojc P. 2009. Metody detekcji polimorfizmu sekwencji DNA i ich zastosowania. W: Biotechnologia Roślin. Redakcja naukowa Stefan Malepszy. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Martin G.B., Vicente M.C., Tanksley S.D. 1993. High-resolution linkage analysis and physical characterization of thebacterial resistance locus in tomato. Molecular Plant Microbiology Interactions 6: 26-34.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Martin G.B., Williams J.G.K., Tanksley S.D. 1991. Rapid identification of markers linked to aresistance gene in tomato by using random primers and nearisogenic lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88: 2336-2340.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. Melchinger A.E. 1990. Use of molecular markers in breeding for oligogenic disease resistance. Plant Breeding 104: 1-19. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1990.tb00396.x]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. Mesbah L.A., Kneppers R.J.A., Takken F.L.W., Laurent P., Hille J., Nijkamp H.J.J. 1999. Genetic and physical analysis of a YAC contig spanning the fungal disease resistance locusof tomato (). Mol Gen Genet 261: 50-57. [DOI: 10.1007/s004380050940]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Miklas P.N., Kelly J.D., Beebe S.E., Blair M.W. 2006. Common bean breeding for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: From classical to MAS breeding. Euphytica 147: 105-131. [DOI: 10.1007/s10681-006-4600-5]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. Moreau P., Thoquet P., Olivier J., Laterrot H., Grimsley N. 1998. Genetic mapping of, a single locus controlling partial resistance toin tomato. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 11(4): 259-269.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Mueller L., Tanksley S.D., Giovannoni J.J., van Eck J., Stack S., Choi D. et al. 2005a. The Tomato Sequencing Project, the first cornerstone of the International Solanaceae Project (SOL). Comparative and Functional Genomics, 6: 153-158, Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). [DOI: 10.1002/cfg.468]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. Mueller L.A., Solow R.H., Taylor N., Skwarecki B., Buels R., Binns J. et al. 2005b. The SOL Genomics Network. A Comparative Resource forBiology and Beyond. Plant Physiology 138: 1310-1317.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  60. Mullis K.B., Faloona F.A. 1987. Specyfic synthesis of DNAvia a polymerasecatalyzed chain reaction. Meth Enzymol 155: 335-350.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. Ohmori T., Murata M., Motoyoshi F. 1996. Molecular characterization of RAPD and SCAR markers linked to thelocus in tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 92(2): 151-156. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00223369]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  62. Paterson R.G., Scott S.J., Gergerich R.C. 1989. Resistance in twospecies to an Arkansas isolate of tomato spotted wilt virus. Euphytica 43: 173-178. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00037910]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  63. Pico B., Diez M.J., Nuez F. 1996. Viral diseases causing the greatest economic losses to the tomato crop .2. The tomato yellow leaf curl virus - A review. Sci. Hort.-Amsterdam 67: 151-196. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4238(96)00945-4]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  64. Pospieszny H., Hasiów-Jaroszewska B., Borodynko N. 2009. Occurrence of tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) on field-grown tomato plants. Progress in Plant Protection/ Postępy w Ochronie Roślin 49(3).
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. PueHee P., Young Ch., HyunRan K., KyeongHo Ch., DaeGeun O., Ki-Taek K. 2010. Development of a SCAR marker linked toinssp. Korean Journal of Breeding Science. 42: 2, 139-143.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Ragot M., Lee M. 2007. Marker-assisted selection in maize Current status, potential, limitations and perspectives from the private and public sectors. p. 117-150. In E.P. Guimarães et al. (ed.) Marker-assisted selection, current status and future perspectives in crops, live-stock, forestry, and fish. FAO, Rome.
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Rick C.M., Fobes J.F. 1974. Association on an allozyme with nematode resistance. Report of the tomato genetics cooperative 24: 25.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Rick C.M. 1957. Genetic and systemic studies on accessions offrom the Galapagos Island. Am. J. Bot. 43: 687-696.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  69. Robert V.J.M., West M.A., Inai S. 2001. Marker-assisted introgression of blackmold resistance QTL alleles from wildto cultivated tomato () and evaluation of QTL phenotypic effects. Molecular Breeding 8(3): 217-233.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  70. Rousseaux M.C., Jones C.M., Adams D., Chetelat R., Bennett A., Powell A. 2005. QTL analysis of fruit antioxidants in tomato usingintrogression lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111: 1396-1408. [DOI: 10.1007/s00122-005-0071-7]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  71. Rush D.W., Epstein E. 1981. Comparative studies on sodium, potassium and chloride relations of wild halophytic and domestic salt-sensitive tomato species. Plant Physiol. 68: 1308-1313.
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. Sandbrink J.M., Van Ooijen J., Purimahua C. 1995. Localization of genes for bacterial canker resistance inusing RFLPs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90(3-4): 444-450. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00221988]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  73. Sarfatti M., Abu-Abied M., Katan J., Zamir D. 1991. RFLP mapping of, a new locus in tomato conferring resistance againstf. sp.race 1. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 82(1): 22-26. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00231273]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  74. Sarfatti M., Katan J., Fluhr R., Zamir D. 1989. An RFLP marker in tomato linked to theresistance gene I2. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78(5): 755-759. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00262574]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  75. Scott J.W., Gardner R.G. 2007. Breeding for resistance to fungal pathogens. Genetic improvement ofcrops. Vol. 2 Tomato, Science Publisher. pp. 421-456.
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. Stamova B.S., Chetelat R.T. 2000. Inheritance and genetic mapping of cucumber mosaic virus resistance introgressed frominto tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101(4): 527-537. [DOI: 10.1007/s001220051512]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  77. Staniaszek M., Kozik E.U., Marczewski W. 2007. A CAPS marker TAO1diagnostic for thegene conferring resistance tof. sp.race 2 in tomato. Plant Breeding 126(3): 331-333. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01355.x]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  78. Staniaszek M., Szajko K., Kozik E., Nowakowska M., Habdas H., Marczewski W. 2010. Marker assisted selection for functional male sterility in tomato. The 7Solanaceae Conference, Dundee, September 5-9, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  79. Stevens M.R., Robbins M.D. 2007. Molecular markers in selection of tomato germplasm. Genetic improvement ofcrops, Vol. 2 Tomato, Science Publisher. pp. 239-260.
    Search in Google Scholar
  80. Stevens M.R., Heiny D.K., Griffiths P.D., Scott J.W., Rhoads D.D. 1996. Identification of co-dominant RAPD markers tightly linked to the tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) resistance gene. TGC Report 46: 27-28.
    Search in Google Scholar
  81. Stevens M.R., Lamb E.M., Rhoads D.D. 1995. Mapping thelocus for tomato spotted wilt virus resistance in tomatoes using RAPD and RFLP analyses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90(3-4): 451-456. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00221989]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  82. Stevens M.A. 1986. Inheritance of tomato fruit quality components. Plant Breed Rev 4: 273-311.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  83. Stommel J.R., Zhang Y.P. 1998. Molecular markers linked to quantitative trait loci for anthracnose resistance in tomato (Abstract). HortScience 33: 514.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  84. Ślusarski Cz. 2000. W tradycyjnej uprawie pod osłonami - choroby doglebowe pomidorów. Hasło Ogrodnicze 12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  85. Tal M., Shannon M.C. 1983. Salt tolerance in the wild relatives of the cultivated tomato responses ofand F1 hybrids to salinity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 10: 109-117. [DOI: 10.1071/PP9830109]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  86. Truco M.J., Randall L.B., Bloom A.J., Clair D.A. St. 2000. Detection of QTLs associated with shoot wilting and root ammonium uptake under chilling temperatures in an interspecific backcross population fromx. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101(7): 1082-1092. [DOI: 10.1007/s001220051583]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  87. Tanksley S.D., Nelson J.C. 1996. Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:191-203. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00223376]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  88. Tanksley S.D., Ganal M.W., Prince J.P., de Vicente M.C., Bonierbale M.W., Broun P., Fulton T.M., Giovannoni J.J., Grandillo S., Martin G.B., Messeguer R., Miller J.C., Miiler L., Paterson A.H., Pineda O., RSder M.S., Wing R.A., Wu W., Young N.D. 1992. High-density molecular linkgae maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132:1141-1160.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  89. Tanksley S.D., Mutschler M.A. 1990. Linkage map of the tomato () (2 N = 24). In: S.J. O'Brien. [ed.], Genetic maps: Locus Maps of Complex Genomes 5th Edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA, pp 6.3-6.15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  90. Tanksley S.D., Rick C.M., Vallejos C.E. 1984. Tight linkage between a nuclear male-sterile locus and an enzyme marker in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 68: 109-113. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00252324]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  91. Tanksley S.D. 1983. Molecular markers in plant breeding. Plant Mol. Biol., Rep 1:3-8. [DOI: 10.1007/BF02680255]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  92. Tanksley S.D., Rick C.M. 1980. Isozyme gene linkage map of the tomato: Applications in genetics and breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 58: 161-170. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00279708]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  93. Vallejos C.E., Tanksley S.D. 1983. Segregation of isozyme markers and cold tolerance in an interspecific backcross of tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 66(3-4): 241-247.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  94. Van der Biezen E.A., Glagotskaya T., Overduin B., Nijkamp H.J.J., Hille J. 1995. Inheritance and genetic mapping of resistance tof. sp.from. Mol Gen Genet. 247: 453-461. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00293147]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  95. Van der Beek J.G., Pet G., Lindgout P. 1994. Resistance to powdery mildew () inis controlled by an incompletely-dominant geneon chromosome 6. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 467-473. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00225382]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  96. Van Heusden A.W., Koornneef M., Voorrips R.E. 1999. Three QTLs fromconfer a high level of resistance tossp.. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99(6): 1068-1074. [DOI: 10.1007/s001220051416]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  97. Williamson V.M., Ho J.Y., Wu F.F., Miller N., Kaloshian I. 1994. A PCR-based marker tightly linked to the nematode resistance gene,, in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87(7): 757-763. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00221126]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  98. Wing R.A., Zhang H-B., Tanksley S.D. 1994. Map-based cloning in crop plants. Tomato as a model system: I. genetic and physical mapping of jointless. Mol. Gen. Genet. 242(6): 681-688. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00283423]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  99. Winter P., Kahl G. 1995. Molecular marker technologies for plant improvement. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 11(4): 438-448. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00364619]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  100. Xu Y., Crouch J.H. 2008. Marker-Assisted Selection in plant breeding: From publication to practice. Crop Science 48: 391-407. [DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0191]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  101. Yang W., Francis D.M. 2007. Genetics and breeding for resistance to bacterial disease in tomato: Prospects for marker-assisted selection. Genetic improvement ofcrops. Tomato, Science Publisher. (2): 379-420.
    Search in Google Scholar
  102. YiPeng Q., HaiTao L., ZiJun Z., QingDao Z. 2009. RAPD marker of the resistant genefor tomato late blight. [Chinese]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica. 36: 8, 1227-1232.
    Search in Google Scholar
  103. Young N.D., Zamir D., Ganal M.W., Tanksley S.D. 1988. Use of isogenic lines and simultaneous probing to identify DNA markers tightly linked to thegene in tomato. Genetics 120: 579-585.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  104. Yu Z.H., Wang J.F., Stall R.E., Vallejos C.E. 1995. Genomic localization of tomato genes that control a hypersensitive reaction topv.(Doidge) Dye. Genetics 141: 675-682.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  105. Yuling B., Lindhout P. 2007. Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: What have we gained and what can we gain in the future. Annals of Botany 100: 1085-1094. [DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm150]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  106. Zamir D., Ekstein-Michelson I., Zakay Y., Navot N., Zeidan M., Sarfatti M. et al. 1994. Mapping and introgression of a tomato yellow leaf curl virus tolerance gene,. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 141-146. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00225889]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  107. Zamir D., Tal M. 1987. Genetic analysis of sodium, potassium and chloride ion content in. Euphytica 36(1): 187-191. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00730663]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  108. Zhang L.P., Lin G.Y., Nino-Liu D., Foolad M.R. 2003. Mapping QTLs conferring early blight () resistance in axcross by selective genotyping. Molecular Breeding. 12(1): 3-19. [DOI: 10.1023/A:1025434319940]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  109. Zhang H-B., Budiman M.A., Wing R.A. 2000. Genetic mapping ofto tomato chromosome 12 using RFLP and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100(8): 1183-1189. [DOI: 10.1007/s001220051422]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  110. Zhang H-B., Martin G.B., Thanksley S.D., Wing R.A. 1994. Map-based cloning in crop plants: tomato as a model system II. Isolation and characterization of a set of overlapping yeast artificial chromosomes encompassing thelocus. Mol. Gen. Genet., 244(6): 613-621. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00282751]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032-011-0001-y | Journal eISSN: 1231-0948
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 23
Published on: Aug 12, 2011
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
tomato,
molecular markers,
molecular breeding,
Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS)
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Life sciences, other

© 2011 Wojciech Szczechura, Mirosława Staniaszek, Hanna Habdas, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 74 (2011): Issue 1 (June 2011)
Next article