Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Comparison of Yielding and Nutritive Value of Organic and Conventional Pepper Fruits Cover

The Comparison of Yielding and Nutritive Value of Organic and Conventional Pepper Fruits

Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research
Volume 71 (2009): Issue 1 (December 2009)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jan 2010
References

References

  1. Asami D.K., Hong Y.J., Mitchell A.E. 2003. Comparison of the total and ascorbic acid content of freeze - dried and air - dried marionberry, strawberry, and corn grown using conventional, organic and sustainable agricultural practices.. 51: 1237-1241.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Buczkowska H, Bednarek H. 2005. Ocena plonowania dwóch odmian papryki słodkiej w polu w odniesieniu do warunków termicznych.5(3): 567-575. [in Polish]
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Ching L.L. 2001. Organic agriculture fights back.10: 1-5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Clark S. 1999. Crop-yield and economic comparisons of organic, low-input and conventional farming systems in California Sacramento Valley.. 14(3): 109-121.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Davies J., Winsor G. 1968. Fruit ripening disorders in relation to the chemical composition of tomato fruit.. 19(8): 468-471.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Davis B.M., Mathews S., Kirk J.T. O. 1970. The nature and biosynthesis of the carotenoids of different colour varieties of.. 9: 797-805.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Elkner K. 1991. The influence of cultivar and growing conditions on the quality of tomatoes for processing. Prace habilitacyjne nr. 8. Instytut Warzywnictwa Skierniewice. [in Polish with English summary]
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Elkner K., Rumpel J. 1995. Effect of crop rotation and fertilization on quality of processing tomatoes.48, 2: 17-25.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Franczuk J. 2000. Zmiany zawartości witaminy C w cebuli odm. Wolska w zależności od rodzaju nawożenia organicznego.364: 87-90. [in Polish]
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Hallmann E., Rembiałkowska E., Kapłoń, L., Szafirowska A, Grudzień, K. 2005. Zawartość związków bioaktywnych w pomidorach i papryce z uprawy ekologicznej i konwencjonalnej. W Monografii: Wybrane zagadnienia ekologiczne we współczesnym rolnictwie. Poznań PIMR: 258-263. [in Polish]
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Hallmann E., Rembiałkowska E. 2007. [Selected nutrient in red onions from organic and conventional production].. 2 (51): 105-111. [in Polish with English summary]
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Jabłońska-Ceglarek R. 1981. Wpływ nawadniania, nawożenia obornikiem i nawożenia mineralnego oraz uprawy po poplonach na wartość odżywczą kapusty białej i selera korzeniowego.. 25: 109-123. [in Polish]
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Jabłońska-Ceglarek R., Rosa R., Franczuk J. 2000. Wpływ nawozów zielonych w formie przedplonów oraz obornika na zawartość wit. C i białka w kapuście głowiastej białej odm Amager. Zesz. Nauk. AR w Krakowie (364): 101-104. [in Polish]
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Kaur C., Kapoor H.C. 2002. Antioxidant activity and total phenols content of some vegetables.. 37: 153-161.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Lee Y., Howard L.R. 1995. Flavonoids and antioxidant activity of fresh pepper () cultivars.. 60: 473-476.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Mac Rae R., Juhasz M., Langer J., Martin R. 2006. Ontario goes organic: how to access Canada's growing billions dollar market for organic food.. 4: 1-11.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Michalik H. 1985. Wpływ nawożenia mikroskładnikami na zawartość suchej masy, cukrów i β-karotenu w marchwi.. 28: 141-161. [in Polish with English summary]
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Perucka I., Materska M. 2007. Antioxidant vitamin contents offruit extracts as affected by processing and variety factors.. 6(4): 67-74.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Pither R., Hall M.N. 1990. Analytical survey of the nutritional composition of organically grown fruits and vegetables. Technical memorandum, 597, MAFF project 4350, Campden Food & Drink Research Association.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Ragazzi E., Veronese G. 1973. Quantitative analysis of phenolic compounds after thin - layer chromatographic separation.. 77: 369-375.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Rembiałkowska E., Hallmann E., Wasiak-Zys G. 2003. [Nutritive and sensory quality of tomatoes from organic and conventional cultivation.]30 (3/4): 893-899. [in Polish with English summary]
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Szafirowska A., Elkner K. 2008. Yielding and fruit quality of three sweet pepper cultivars from organic and conventional cultivation.. 69: 135-143. [DOI: 10.2478/v10032-008-0028-x]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Vinson J.A., Hao Y., Su X. 1998. Phenol antioxidant quantity and quality in foods: Vegetables.. 46: 3630-3634.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Wójcik-Wojtkowiak D., Politycka B., Mielcarz B. 2000. Wartość biologiczna warzyw nawożonych ziemią kompostową. Zesz. Nauk. AR w Krakowie (364): 209-212. [in Polish]
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Zhishen J., Mengcheng T., Jianming W. 1999. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals., 64: 555-559.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032-009-0032-9 | Journal eISSN: 1231-0948
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 121
Published on: Jan 7, 2010
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
pepper,
organic cultivation,
fruit quality,
antioxidants
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Life sciences, other

© 2010 Anna Szafirowska, Krystyna Elkner, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 71 (2009): Issue 1 (December 2009)
Previous article
Next article