Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Middle and Large Fruit Size Greenhouse Tomato - On-Farm Research Cover

Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Middle and Large Fruit Size Greenhouse Tomato - On-Farm Research

Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research
Volume 71 (2009): Issue 1 (December 2009)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jan 2010
References

References

  1. Arazuri S., Jaren C., Arana J.I., Perez de Ciriza J.J. 2007. Influence of mechanical harvest on the physical properties of processing tomato (Mill.)80: 190-198.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Artes F., Conesa M.A., Hernandez S., Gil M.I. 1999. Keeping quality of fresh-cut tomato.17: 153-162.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Batu A. 2004. Determination of acceptable firmness and colour values of tomatoes.61: 471-475.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein L., Francois L.E. 1975. Effects of frequency of sprinking with saline waterscompared with daily drip irrigation.67: 185-190.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Brazaitytė A. 2000. Phytomonitoring investigations of physiology of tomato productivity and resistance. Scientic works of the Lithuanian Institute of Horticulture and Lithuanian University of Agriculture.19(3): 25-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. De Rijck G., Schevens E. 1998. Distribution of nutrients and water in rockwool slabs.72: 277-285.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Diezma-Iglesias B., Valero C., Garcia-Ramoz F.J., Ruiz-Altisent M. 2006. Monitoring of firmness evaluation of peaches during storage by combing acoustic and impact methods.77: 926-935.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Gallardo M., Thompson R.B., Valdez L.C., Fernández M.D. 2006. Use of stem diameter variations to detect plant water stress in tomato.24: 241-255.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Halevy S., Koth H., Guggenheim K. 1957. The vitamin and mineral content of fruits and vegetables grown in Israel.11: 409-413.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Hernandez Suarez M., Rodriguez Rodriguez E.M., Diaz Romero C. 2007. Chemical composition of tomato () from Tenerife, the Canary Islands.106: 1046-1056.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Ho L.C., Grange R.I., Picken A.S. J. 1987. An analysis of the accumulation of water and dry matter in tomato fruit.10: 157-162.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Hoffman G.J. 1986. Salinity. In: Trickle Irrigation for Crop Production. (F.S. Naukayama & D.A. Buks eds.). pp: 345-362.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Hsiao T.C. 1993. Growth and productivity of crops in relation to water status.335: 137-148.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Jonson R.W., Dixon M.A., Lee D.R. 1992. Water relations of the tomato during fruit growth.15: 947-953.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Li Y.L. 2000. Analysis of greenhouse tomato production in relation to salinity and shoot environment. Ph.D. Dissertation. Wageningen University, Wageningen, 96 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Oster J.D., Hoffman G.J., Robinson F.E. 1984. Dealing with salinity: Management alternatives: Crops, water, and soil.38 (10): 29-32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Premuzic Z., Bargiela M., Garcia A., Rendina A., Lorio A. 1998. Calcium, iron, potassium, phosphorus, and vitamin C content of organic and hydroponic tomatoes.33: 255-257.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Raffo A., La Malfa G., Fogliano V., Maiani G., Quaglia G. 2006. Seasonal variations in antioxidant components of cherry tomatoes (cv. Naomi F).19: 11-19.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Simonneau T., Habib R., Goutouly J.P., Huguet J.G. 1993. Diurnal changes in stem diameter depend upon variations in water content: direct evidence in peach trees. J. Exp. Bot. 1531-1532.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Tabatabaie S.J., Gregory P.J., Hadley P. 2004. Uneven distribution of nutrients in the root zone affects the incidence of blossom end rot and concentration of calcium and potassium in fruits of tomato.258: 169-178.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Thybo A.K., Edelenbos M., Christensen L.P., Sorensen J.N., Thorup-Kristensen K. 2006. Effect of organic growing system on sensory quality and chemical composition of tomatoes.39: 835-843.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Ton Y., Nilov N., Kopyt M. 1997. Phytomonitoring: a new information technology for improving crop production. Abstr. 3International Symposium on Sensors in Horticulture, Tiberias, Israel, August 17-21. pp.: 56-57.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Toor R.K., Savage G.P., Lister C.E. 2006. Seasonal variations in the antioxidant composition of greenhouse grown tomatoes.19: 1-10.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Willumsen J., Petersen K.K., Kaack K. 1996. Yield and blossom-end rot of tomato as affected by salinity and cation activity ratios in the root zone.71(1): 81-98.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Zekki H., Gary C., Gosselin A., Gauthier L. 1999. Validation of photosynthesis model through the use of the CObalance of greenhouse tomato canopy.84: 591-598.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032-009-0030-y | Journal eISSN: 1231-0948
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 89 - 102
Published on: Jan 7, 2010
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
early yield,
biometric measurements,
EC,
chemical composition,
physical properties,
nutrition
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Life sciences, other

© 2010 Katarzyna Kowalczyk, Janina Gajc-Wolska, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 71 (2009): Issue 1 (December 2009)
Previous article
Next article