Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of Light Conditions and Temperature on Fresh Yield of Some Spice Plants Grown in Containers Cover

Effect of Light Conditions and Temperature on Fresh Yield of Some Spice Plants Grown in Containers

Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research
Volume 71 (2009): Issue 1 (December 2009)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jan 2010
References

References

  1. Albright L.D., Both A.J., Chiu A.J. 2000. Controlling greenhouse light to a consistent daily integral.43(2): 421-431.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Aufhammer W. 1998. Getreide - und andere Körnerfruchtarten. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart: 13-18. [in German]
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Both A.J., Albright L.D., Langhans R.W., Reiser R.A., Vinzant B.G. 1997. Hydroponic lettuce production influenced by integrated supplemental light levels in a controlled environment agriculture facility: experimental results.418: 45-52.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Brechner M.L., Albright L.D., Weston L.A. 2007. Impact of a variable light intensity at a constant light integral: effects on biomass and production of secondary metabolites by756: 221-228.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Bruggink G.T., Heuvelink E. 1987. Influence of light on the growth of young tomato, cucumber and sweet pepper plants in the greenhouse: Effects on relative growth rate, net assimilation rate and leaf area ratio.31: 161-174.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Charles-Edwards D.A. 1978. An analysis of the photosynthesis and productivity of vegetative crops in the United Kingdom.42: 717-731.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Farooqi A.H. A., Sangwan N.S., Sangwan R.S. 1999. Effect of different photoperiodic regimes on growth, flowering and essential oil in Mentha species.29: 181-187.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Fausey B.A., Heins R.D., Cameron A.C. 2005. Daily light integral affects flowering and quality of greenhouse-grown, and40: 114-118.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Good E.N., Bell E.D. 1985. Fotosynteza i plon roślin uprawnych. pp. 14-31. In: Biologia plonowania (P.S. Carlson ed.). PWRiL, Warszawa. [in Polish]
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Hall D.O., Rao K.K. 1999. Fotosynteza. WNT, Warszawa: 11-22. [in Polish]
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Hälvä, S., Craker L.E., Simon J.E., Charles D.J. 1993. Growth and essential oil in dill,L. in response to temperature and photoperiod.1: 47-56.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Harris G.P., Scoot M.A. 1968. Studies on the glasshouse carnation: effects of light and temperature on the growth and development of the flower.33: 143-152.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Heins R.D., Liu B., Runkle E.S. 2000. Regulation of crop growth and development based on enviromental factors.516: 13-22.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Jameison P.D., Martin R.J., Francis G.S., Wilson D.R. 1995. Drought effects on biomass production and radiation - use efficiency in barley.43: 77-86.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Jones H.G. 1992. Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to enviromental plant physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 14-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Kozai T., Ohyama K. 2006. Commercialized closed system with artificial lighting for plant production.711: 61-70.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Krug H. 1997. Enviromental influences on development, growth and yield, pp. 101-108. In: The physiology of vegetable crops (H.C. Wien ed.). CAB International, Wallingford.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Liu B., Heins R.D. 1997. Plant quality related to the ratio of radiant energy to thermal energy.435: 171-182.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Liu B., Heins R.D. 1998. Modeling poinsettia vegetative growth and development: The response to the ratio of radiant to thermal energy.465: 171-182.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Masson J., Tremblay N., Gosselin A. 1991. Nitrogen fertilization and HPS supplementary lighting influence vegetable transplant production. I. Transplant growth.116: 594-598.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Miguel M.G., Duarte F., Venâncio F., Tavares R. 2002. Changes of the chemical composition of the essential oil of Portuguesein the course of the vegetation period.576: 83-86.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Monteith J.L. 1977. Climate and the efficiency of crop production on Britain.281: 277-294.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Prince S.D. 1991. A model of regional primary production for use with coarse resolution satellite data.12: 1313-1330.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Putievsky E. 1983. Temperature and daylength influences on the growth and germination of sweet basil and oregano.58: 583-587.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Runkle E.S., Heins R.D. 2006. Manipulating the light environment to control flowering and morphogenesis of herbaceous plants.711: 51-59.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Tei F., Scaife A., Aikman D.P. 1996. Growth of lettuce, onion and red beet. 1. Growth analysis, light interception, and radiation use efficiency.78: 633-643.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Warren-Wilson J. 1981. Analysis of growth, photosynthesis and light interception for single plants and stands.48: 507-512.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032-009-0027-6 | Journal eISSN: 1231-0948
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 67
Published on: Jan 7, 2010
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
light,
photoperiod,
spice plants,
temperature
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Life sciences, other

© 2010 Barbara Frąszczak, Mikołaj Knaflewski, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 71 (2009): Issue 1 (December 2009)
Previous article
Next article