Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Canopy Architecture and Yielding of Different Tomato Morphotypes Under Glasshouse Conditions Cover

Canopy Architecture and Yielding of Different Tomato Morphotypes Under Glasshouse Conditions

Open Access
|Jul 2009

References

  1. Blanko F.F., Folegatti M.V. 2003. A new method for estimating the leaf area index of cucumber and tomato plants. Hortic. Bras. 21: 666-669.10.1590/S0102-05362003000400019
  2. Brandt S., Lugasi A., Barna E., Hovari J., Pek Z., Helyes L. 2003. Effects of the growing methods and conditions on the lycopene content of tomato fruits. Acta Alim. Budapest. 32: 269-278.10.1556/AAlim.32.2003.3.6
  3. Brantley S.T., Young D.R. 2007. Leaf-area index and light attenuation in rapidly expanding shrub thickets. Ecology 88: 524-530.10.1890/06-0913
  4. Francescangeli N., Sagiacomo M., Marti H. 2006. Effects of plant density in broccoli on yield and radiation use efficiency. Sci. Hortic. 110: 135-143.10.1016/j.scienta.2006.06.025
  5. Galiński W., Pietkiewicz S. 1987. Optymalny moment początku wiązania bulw jako element charakterystyki hodowlanej roślin ziemniaka. 17 Coll. Metodol. Agrobiom. PAN: 207-214. [in Polish]
  6. Gautier H., Guichard S., Tchamitchian M. 2001. Modulation of competition between fruits and leaves by flower pruning and water fogging, and consequences on tomato leaf and fruit growth. Ann. Bot. 88: 645-652.
  7. Grochowski Z. 2000. Wzrost, wymiana gazowa i wykorzystanie promieniowania fotosyntetycznie czynnego przez komosę ryżową (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Praca doktorska, SGGW, Warszawa. [in Polish]
  8. Halmann E., Kobryń J. 2002. Fruit quality estimation of two tomato types (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. and Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme) grown on rockwool in the glasshouse. Folia Hort. 14: 79-86.
  9. Harmanto S., Salokhe V.M., Babel M.S., Tantau H.J. 2005. Water requirement of drip irrigated tomatoes grown in greenhouse in tropical environment. Agric. Water Managem. 71: 225-242.10.1016/j.agwat.2004.09.003
  10. Horbowicz M., Saniewski M. 2000. Biosynthesis, occurrence and biological properties of lycopene. Post. Nauk Roln. 1: 37-42.
  11. Kotlarska-Jaros E., Pietkiewicz S., Rykaczewska K. 2003. Growth analysis of potato fertilized by different rate nitrogen fertilization. 4th Int. Conf. Ph. D. Students Univ. of Miskolc, Hangary: 309-314.
  12. Lemair G., Oosterom E., Sheehy J., Jeufforoy M.H., Massignam A., Rossato L. 2007. Is crop N more closely related to dry matter accumulation or leaf area expansion during vegetative growth? Field Crops Res. 100: 91-106.10.1016/j.fcr.2006.05.009
  13. Li W., Han X., Zhang Y., Li Z. 2007. Effects of elevated CO2 concentration, irrigation and nitrogenous fertilizer application on the growth and yield of spring wheat in semi-arid areas. Agric. Water Managem. 87: 106-114.
  14. Li Y.L., Stanghellini C. 2001. Analysis of the effect of EC and potential transpiration on vegetative growth of tomato. Sci. Hort. 89: 9-21.10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00219-3
  15. Łoboda T., Pietkiewicz S., Dmoch J., Markus J., Lewandowski M. 1997. Związek parametrów fizjologicznych rzepaku odmiany Leo z uszkodzeniami powodowanymi przez słodyszka rzepakowca. Rośl. Oleiste 18: 381-388. [in Polish]
  16. Nichiporovich A.A. 1955. Svietovoe i uglerodnoe pitanie rastenij (fotosintez) Moskva. Izd. AN SSSR. [in Russian]
  17. Norby R.J., Sholtis J.D., Gunderson C.A. Jawdy S.S. 2003. Leaf dynamics of a deciduous forest canopy: no response to elevated CO2. Oecologia 136: 574-584.10.1007/s00442-003-1296-212811536
  18. Orłowski M., Fawcett M. 2001. Ocena wartości biologicznej owoców pomidora drobnoowocowego typu cherry. Biologiczne i agrotechniczne kierunki rozwoju warzyw. Ogólnopolska Konf. Nauk. Skierniewice: 129-130. [in Polish]
  19. Pala J., Pietkiewicz S. 2002. Komputerowe prognozowanie wzrostu, rozwoju i plonowania roślin uprawnych. W: Grzesiuk S. Fizjologia plonowania roślin. UWM Olsztyn: 221-252. [in Polish]
  20. Rocha-Gutierrez E. 2004. Wykorzystanie fotosyntetycznej radiacji do produkcji biomasy tradycyjnych i półkarłowych ozimych form pszenżyta, pszenicy i żyta. Praca doktorska, SGGW, Warszawa. [in Polish]
  21. Sesay Gibrill S. 1997. Effect of water stress on the physiological parameters of Amaranthus cruenthus and Chenopodium guinoa. Ph.D. Thesis, SGGW, Warszawa.
  22. Starck Z. 2003. Transport i dystrybucja substancji pokarmowych w roślinach. Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa. [in Polish]
  23. Starck Z., Cieśla E. 1988. Possible role of growth regulators in adaptation to heat stress affecting partitioning of photosynthates in tomato plants. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 58: 71-84.10.5586/asbp.1989.006
  24. Varlet-Grancher C., Bonhomme R., Sinoquet H. 1993. Crop Structure and Light Microclimate: Characterization and Applications. INRA: 518pp
  25. Watson D.J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. Ann. Bot. 11: 41-76.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083148
  26. Watson D.J. 1952. Physiological basis of variation in yield. Adv. Agron. 4: 101-145.10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60307-7
  27. Watson D.J. 1958. The dependence of net assimilation rate on leaf area index. Ann. Bot. 22: 37-54.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083596
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 58
Published on: Jul 31, 2009
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2009 Aliaksandr Abukhovich, Stefan Pietkiewicz, Romualda Karwowska, Jolanta Kobryń, Hazem Kalaji, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 70 (2009): Issue 1 (June 2009)