Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Self-Compatibility Inheritance in Tomatillo (Physalis Ixocarpa Brot.) Cover

Self-Compatibility Inheritance in Tomatillo (Physalis Ixocarpa Brot.)

Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research
Volume 67 (2007): Issue 1 (December 2007)
By: ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Dec 2007
References

References

  1. Bateman A.J. 1952. Self-incompatibility systems in the angiosperms.6: 285-310.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Bateman A.J. 1954. Self-incompatibility systems in the angiosperms. II.8: 305-332.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Cipar M.S., Peloquin S.J., Hougas R.W. 1964. Variability in the expression of self-incompatibility in tuber-bearing diploid41:155-162.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Tsukamoto T., Ando T., Kokubun H., Watanabe H., Masada M., Zhu X., Marchesi E., Kao T. 1999. Breakdown of self-incompatibility in a natural population of(Solanaceae) in Uruguay containing both self-incompatible and self-compatible plants.12: 6-13.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Williams W. 1965. Genetical principles and plant breeding.527 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Wünsch A., Hormaza J.I. 2004. Genetic and molecular analysis in Cristobalina sweet cherry, a spontaneous self-compatible mutant.17: 203-210.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Zuberi M.I, Zuberi S., Lewis D. 1981. The genetics of incompatibility in Brassica. I. Inheritance of self-compatibility inL. var. Toria.46:175-190.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Cook L.M., Soltis P.S. 2000. Mating systems of diploid and allotetraploid populations of.84: 410-415.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. De Nettancourt D. 1977. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. East E.M. 1940. The distribution of self-sterility in flowering plants.82, 449.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. East E.M., Mangelsdorf P. 1925. A new interpretation of the hereditary behaviour of self-sterile plants.24, 56.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Gerstel D.U. 1950. Self-incompatibility studies in Guayule II.45, 482.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Hosaka K., Hanneman R.E. 1998. Genetics of self-compatibility in a self-incompatible wild diploid potato species. 1. Detection of an S locus inhibitor (Sli) gene.99: 191-197.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Hughes M.B., Babcock E.B. 1950. Self-incompatibility in. Genetics. 35, 570.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Husband B.C., Schemske D.W. 1997. The effect of inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid populations of: implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression.51: 737-746.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Iezzoni A., Smith H., Albertini A. 1990. Cherries. pp. 109-174. In: Genetic Resources of Temperate Fruit and Nut Crops 1. (J.N. Moore & J.R. Bollington eds.). Int. Soc. Hort. Sci., Wageningen, The Netherlands.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Kakizaki Y. 1930. Self- and cross-incompatibilty in the common cabbage.5:133-208.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Keep E. 1985. Heterozygosity for self-incompatibility in Lloyd George red raspberry.39(4): 5-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Kondo K., Yamamoto M., Itahashi R., Sato, T. 2002. Insights into evolution of self-compatibility infrom a study of stylar factors.30: 143-152.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Kowyama Y., Kunz C., Lewis I., Newbigin E., Clarke A.E., Anderson M.A. 1994. Self-compatibility in avariant (LA2157) is associated with lack of style S-RNase activity.88: 859-864.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Onus A.N., Pickersgill B. 2004. Unilateral incompatibility in: occurrence and taxonomic distribution.94: 289-295.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Pandey K.K. 1957. Genetics of self-incompatibility inBrot.- A new system.44:879-887.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Pandey K.K. 1960. Self-incompatibility system in two Mexican species of, 185, 483.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Richards A.J. 1986. Plant breeding systems. Allen and Unwin, London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Soost R.K. 1969. The incompatibility gene system in citrus. pp: 189,190. In: Proc. of the First Intl. Citrus Symp. 1, (H.D. Chapman ed.).University of California, Riverside, CA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Stone J.L. 2002. Molecular mechanisms underlying the breakdown of gametophytic self-incompatibility.77(1): 17-32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Takayama S., Isogai A. 2005. Self-icompatibility in plants.56: 467-489.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Lundqvist A. 1964. The nature of the two loci incompatibility system in grasses. IV. Interaction between the loci in relation to self-compatibility inHuds.52: 221-234.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Mable B.K. 2004. Polyploidy and self-compatibility: is there an association?162: 803-811.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Menzel M.Y. 1951. The cytotaxonomy and genetics of.95:132-183.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032-007-0026-4 | Journal eISSN: 1231-0948
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 24
Published on: Dec 31, 2007
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
tomatillo,
Solanaceae,
self-compatibility gene,
stem pubescence gene,
inheritance
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Life sciences, other

© 2007 Juan Mulato-Brito, Aureliano Peña-Lomelí, Jaime Sahagún-Castellanos, Clemente Villanueva-Verduzco, José de Jesús López-Reynoso, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 67 (2007): Issue 1 (December 2007)
Previous article
Next article