Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Application of Kernel Estimation in Analysis of Labour Productivity of the Largest Polish Firms in 2004-2008

Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia
Volume 8 (2009): Issue 1 (January 2009)
By:
Open Access
|Mar 2011

References

  1. Batóg, J., Gazińska, M. & Mojsiewicz, M. (2002). Ekonometryczne normowanie indywidualnej wydajności pracy. Przegląd Statystyczny, 49(1), 79-89.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Batóg, J. (2001). Dominujący typ rozkładu zmiennych w mikroskali. Wiadomości Statystyczne, 3, 18-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Benito, J. M. & Ezcurra, R. (2003). Spatial Disparities in Productivity and Industry Mix. The Case of the European Regions. Department of Economics, Universidad Pública de Navarra.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Dall'erba, S., Kamarianakis, Y., Le Gallo, J. & Plotnikova, M. (2005). Regional Productivity Differentials in Three New Member Countries What Can We Learn from the 1986 Enlargement to the South? The Review of Regional Studies, 35(1), 97-116.10.52324/001c.8337
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Doyle, E. & O'Leary, E. (1999). The Role of Structural Change in Labour Productivity Convergence among European Union Countries: 1970-1990. Journal of Economic Studies, 26(2), 106-120.10.1108/01443589910258452
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall.10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Fiaschi, D. & Lavezzi, A. M. (2006). Productivity Polarization and Sectoral Dynamics in European Regions. Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Universit‵a di Pisa, and Dipartimento di Studi su Politica, Diritto e Societ‵a, Universit‵a di Palermo, October.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Fingleton, B. & López-Bazo, E. (2003). Explaining the Distribution of Manufacturing Productivity in the EU Regions. ERSA conference papers ersa 03p197, European Regional Science Association.10.1007/978-3-662-07136-6_14
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Hozer, J. (1991). Statystyka Bosego-Einsteina a skrajnie prawostronnie asymetryczne rozkłady demograficznych i ekonomicznych zmiennych losowych. In Wyzwania dla nauk ekonomicznych w społecznej gospodarce rynkowej. Szczecin: Fundacja na Rzecz Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Hultberg, P. T., Nadiri, M. I. & Sickles, R. C. (2004). Cross-country Catch-up in the Manufacturing Sector Impacts of Heterogeneity on Convergence and Technology Adoption, Empirical Economics, 29, 753-768. DOI 10.1007/s00181-004-0209-5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Krüger, J. J. (2004). Using the Manufacturing Productivity Distribution to Evaluate Growth Theories. Jenaer Schriften zur Wirtschaftswissenschaft Arbeits- und Diskussionspapiere der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Margaritis, D., Färe, R. & Grosskopf, S. (2007). Productivity, Convergence and Policy: A Study of OECD Countries and Industries. In E. Thanassoulis & V. V. Podinovski (Guest Eds.), Special issue on Applications and Application-Motivated Developments in Productivity Analysis, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(1-2), 87-105. DOI 10.1007/s11123-007-0044-8.10.1007/s11123-007-0044-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Mojsiewicz, M. (2002). Badanie wpływu asymetrii informacji na ryzyko polskich instytucji ubezpieczeniowych. Analiza statystyczna. Rozprawy i Studia T. (DV) 431, Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Nicolini, R. (2007). Labor Productivity in Spain 1977-2002. Institut d'Anàlis Econòmica, CSIC, November.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Polska 2005. Raport o stanie gospodarki. (2005). Warszawa: Ministerstwo Gospodarki i Pracy, Departament Analiz i Prognoz Ekonomicznych.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Quah, D. (1997). Regional Convergence from Local Isolated Actions Historical Outcomes. CEP Discussion Papers 0378, Center for Economic Performance, LSE.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Scarpetta, S. & Tressel, T. (2002). Productivity and Convergence in a Panel of OECD Industries: Do Regulations and Institutions Matter? Economics Department Working Papers, OECD Publishing, 342.10.2139/ssrn.335520
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Sheather, S. J. & Jones, M. C. (1991). A Reliable Data-Based Bandwidth Selection Method for Kernel Density Estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 53, 683-690.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01857.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Tokarski, T. & Gajewski, P. (2002). Zależność między wydajnością pracy i zatrudnieniem w krajach OECD. Wiadomości Statystyczne, 8, 56-71.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Van Biesebroeck, J. (2003). Revisiting Some Productivity Debates. NBER Working Paper 10065. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w1006510.3386/w10065
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10031-009-0007-5 | Journal eISSN: 1898-0198 | Journal ISSN: 1730-4237
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 126 - 139
Published on: Mar 21, 2011
Published by: University of Szczecin
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
labour productivity,
distributions,
kernel estimation
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other

© 2011 Barbara Batóg, Jacek Batóg, Magdalena Mojsiewicz, published by University of Szczecin
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 8 (2009): Issue 1 (January 2009)