Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Determinants of Within-Patch Microdistribution and Movements of Endangered Butterfly Coenonympha Oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) Cover

Determinants of Within-Patch Microdistribution and Movements of Endangered Butterfly Coenonympha Oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)

Hacquetia
Volume 8 (2009): Issue 2 (December 2009)
By: Tatjana Čelik,  Branko Vreš and  Andrej Seliškar  
Open Access
|Jan 2010

References

  1. Abadijev, S.P. 2001: An Atlas of the Distribution of the Butterflies in Bulgaria (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea). Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow, 335 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Aistleitner, U., Mayr, T. & Siegel, C. 2006: Nachweise von neuen, verschollenen un stark gefährdeten Grossschmetterlingen aus Vorarlberg, Austria occ. (Lepidoptera). Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft österreichischer Entomologen, 58: 1-10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Anthes, N., Fartmann, T., Hermann, G. & Kaule, G. 2003: Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure - the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies. Journal of Insect Conservation, 7: 175-185.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Auckland, J.N., Debinski, D.M. & Clark, W.R. 2004: Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius.Ecological Entomology, 29: 139-149.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Baguette, M., Vansteenwegen, C., Convi, I. & Neve, G. 1998: Sex-biased density-dependent migration in a metapopulation of the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia.Acta Oecologica, 19: 17-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Balleto, E., Bonelli S. & Cassulo L. 2005: Mapping the Italian Butterfly Diversity for Conservation. In: Kühn, E., Feldmann, R., Thomas, J. & Settele, J. (eds.): Studies in the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. Vol. 1: General concepts and case studies. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow, pp. 71-76.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Balleto, E. & Kudrna, O. 1985: Some Aspects of the Conservation of Butterflies in Italy, with Recommendations for a future Strategy (Lepidoptera Hesperiidae & Papilionoidea). Bolletino della Società Entomologica Italiana, 117: 39-59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Bozano, G.C. 2002: Guide to the butterflies of the Palearctic region. Satyrinae part III. Omnes Artes, Milano, 71 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Brakefield, P.M. 1982: Ecological studies on the butterfly Maniola jurtina in Britain. I. Adult behaviour, microdistrbution and dispersal. Journal of Animal Ecology, 51: 713-726.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964: Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetations Kunde. 3. Auflage. Springer, Wien-New York, 865 pp.10.1007/978-3-7091-8110-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Brommer, J.E. & Fred, M.S. 1999: Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches. Ecological Entomology, 24: 125-131.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Brown, I.L. & Ehrlich, P.R. 1980: Population biology of the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydras chalcedona.Structure of the Jasper Ridge colony. Oecologia, 47: 239-251.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Buszko, J. 2005: Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787). In Polska Czerwona Księga Zwierząt - Bezkręgowce http://www.iop.krakow.pl/pckz/opis.asp?id=99&je=pl
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Chew, F.S. & Robbins, R.K. 1989: Egg-laying in Butterflies. In: Vane-Wright, R.I. & Ackery, P. R. (eds.): The biology of Butterflies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 65-79.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Chrétien, M.P. 1886: Une note sur les premiers ćtats du Coenonympha oedippus. In: Bourgeois, M.J. (ed.): Séance du 13 octobre 1886 (Bulletin entomologique). Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, 6: 638 (157).
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Cooch, E. & White, G. 2008: Program MARK. "A Gentle Introduction". 7th Edition.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Čelik, T. 1997: Ecological researches of endangered species Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius, 1787 (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) on the Ljubljansko barje. Msc Thesis, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, 67 pp. (In Slovene with English summary)
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Čelik, T. 2003: Population structure, migration and conservation of Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius, 1787 (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) in a fragmented landscape. PhD Thesis, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, 100 pp. (In Slovene with English summary)
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Čelik, T. 2004: Population dynamics of endangered species Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius, 1787 (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) on the Ljubljansko barje. Acta Entomologica Slovenica, 12: 99-114.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Čelik, T., Verovnik, R., Gomboc, S. & Lasan, M. 2005: Natura 2000 in Slovenia: Lepidoptera. Založba ZRC SAZU, ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana, 288 pp. (In Slovene with English summary)
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Dennis, L.H.R. 2004: Just how important are structural elements as habitat components? Indications from a declining lycaenid butterfly with priority conservation status. Journal of Insect Conservation, 8: 37-45.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Dierks, K. 2006: Beobachtungen zur Larvalbiologie von Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) im Südwesten Frankreichs (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Entomologische Zeitschrift, 116 (4): 186-188.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Drouet, E. 1989: La situation de Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius dans le département de l'Isère (Lepidoptera Nymphalidae Satyrinae). Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon, 58: 345-349.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Ehrlich, P.R. 1989: The structure and dynamics of butterfly populations. In: Vane-Wright, R.I. & Ackery, P.R. (eds.): The biology of Butterflies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 25-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Elligsen, H., Beinlich B. & Plachter, H. 1997: Effects of large-scale cattle grazing on populations of Coenonympha glycerion and Lasiommata megera (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Journal of Insect Conservation, 1: 13-23.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. ESRI, 1999-2006: Arc GIS 9, ArcMap version 9.2. ESRI Inc.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Fischer, K., Beinlich, B. & Plachter, H. 1999: Population structure, mobility and habitat preferences of the violet copper Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Western Germany: implications for conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation, 3: 43-52.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Fleishman, E., Ray, C., Sjörgen-Gulve, P., Boggs, C.L. & Murphy, D.D. 2002: Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conservation Biology, 16: 1-11.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Fowler, J. & Cohen, L. 1992: Practical statistics for field biology. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore, 227 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Gibbs, M., Lace, L.A., Jones, M.J. & Moore, A.J. 2004: Intraspecific competition in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria: Effect of rearing density and gender on larval life history. Journal of Insect Science, 4: 16, 6 pp.10.1673/031.004.1601
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Gorbunov, P. 2001: The butterflies of Russia: classification, genitalia, keys for identification (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea). Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Publishers Thesis, Ekaterinburg, 320 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Gutiérrez, D., Thomas, C.D. & Cortes-Leon, J.L. 1999: Dispersal, distribution, patch network and metapopulation dynamics of the dingy skipper butterfly (Erynnis tages). Oecologia, 121: 506-517.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Habeler, H. 1972: Zur Kenntnis der Lebensräume von Coenonympha oedippus F. (Lep. Satyridae). Nachr. Bayer. Ent. 21, 3: 51-54.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Hafner, J. 1910: Makrolepidopteren von Görz und Umgebung. Entomologischen Zeitschrift, XXIV Jahrgang, Sonder-Abdruck: 1-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Heath, J. 1981: Threatened Rhopalocera (Butterflies) in Europe. European Committee for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Council of Europe, 157 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Ide, J. 2002: Mating behaviour and light conditions cause seasonal changes in the dispersal pattern of the satyrine butterfly Lethe diana.Ecological Entomology, 27: 33-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Ims, R.A. & Hjermann, D.Ø. 2001: Condition-dependent dispersal. In: Clobert, J., Danchin, E., Dhondt, A.A. & Nichols, J.D. (eds.): Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 203-216.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Ims, R.A. & Yaccoz, G.N. 1997: Studying Transfer Processes in Metapopulations. Emigration, Migration and Colonization. In: Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M.E. (eds.): Metapopulation biology. Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 247-265.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Kaligarič, M., 1997: Rastlinstvo Primorskega krasa in Slovenske Istre. Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko: Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče Republike Slovenije, Koper, 111 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Kolar, H. 1919: Über das Vorkommen von Coenonympha oedippus F. Zeitschrift der öster reichischen Entomologen-Vereines, Wien, 4. Jahrgang: 96.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Kolar, H. 1929: Verbreitung von Coenonympha oedippus F. in Europa. Verhandlugen des zoologisch-botanischen Vereins in Wien, Jahr 1928, Band 78: 105-108.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Konvicka, M., Hula, V. & Fric, Z. 2003: Habitat of pre-hibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly Euphydras aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): What can be learned from vegetation composition and structure? European Journal of Entomology, 100: 313-322.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Krauss, J., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Müller, C.B. & Tscharntke, T. 2005: Relative importance of resource quantity, isolation and habitat quality for landscape distribution of monophagous butterfly. Ecography, 28: 465-474.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Kučinić, M., Tvrtković, N. & Kletečki, E. 1999: The False Ringelt (Coenonympha oedippus F.) is a member of the Croatian butterfly fauna after all. Natura Croatica, 8: 399-405.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M., Hanski I. 1996: An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia.Journal of Animal Ecology, 65: 791-801.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Lafranchis, J. 2004: Fische Insectes protégés. Le Fadet des laîches. Insectes, 133: 21-22.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Lafranchis, T. 2000: Les Papillions de jour de France, Belgique et Luxembourg et leurs chenilles. Collection Parthenope, editions Biotope, Meze, 448 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Lhonore, J. 1996: Coenonympha oedippus. Nature and environment, 79: 98-104.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Lhonore, J. 1998: Biologie, écologie et répartition de quatre espèces de Lépidoptères Rhopalocères protégés (Lycaenidae, Satyridae) dans l'Ouest de la France. Rapport d'études de l'OPIE, vol. 2 http://www.inra.fr/opie-insectes/re-rhopa.htm
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Lhonore, J. & Lagarde, M. 1999: Biogeographie, ecologie et protection de Coenonympha oedippus (Fab., 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 35 (suppl.): 299-307.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Loertscher, M., Erhardt, A. & Zettel, J. 1995: Microdistribution of butterflies in a mosaiclike habitat: The role of nectar sources. Ecography, 18: 15-26.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Luoto, M., Kuussaari, M., Rita, H., Salminen, J. & von Bonsdorff, T. 2001: Determinants of distribution and abundance in the clouded apollo butterfly: a lanscape ecological approach. Ecography, 24: 601-617.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Manly, B.F.J. 1971: Estimates of a Marking Effect with Capture-Recapture Sampling. Journal of Applied Ecology, 8: 181-189.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Martinčič, A., Wraber, T., Jogan, N., Podobnik, A., Turk, B., Vreš, B., Ravnik, V., Frajman, B., Strgulc Krajšek, S., Trčak, B., Bačič, T., Fischer, M. A., Eler, K. & Surina, B. 2007: Mala flora Slovenije. Ključ za določanje praprotnic in semenk. Četrta, dopolnjena in spremenjena izdaja. Tehniška založba Slovenije, Ljubljana, 967 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Matter, S.F. & Roland, J. 2002: An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus.Ecological Entomology, 27: 308-316.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Matter, S.F., Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N. & Sabourin, K. 2003: The effects of isolation, habitat area, and resources on the abundance, density, and movements of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus.American Midland Naturalist, 150: 26-36.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Morton, A.C. 1989: The Effects of Marking and Handling on Recapture Frequencies of Butterflies. In: Vane-Wright, R.I. & Ackery, P.R. (eds.): The biology of Butterflies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 55-58.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Oberdorfer, E. 1978: Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften II, 2. Aufl., Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, 355 pp. Oberdorfer, E. (ed.) 1983: Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften III, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Stuttgart, New York, 455 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Pastoralis, G. & Reiprich, A. 1995: Zoznam Motylov vyskytujucich sa na uzemi Slovenska. Spišska Nova Ves, Komarno, 52 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Pollard, E. & Yates, T. J. 1993: Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman & Hall, London, 274 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Ravenscroft, N.O.M. 1994: The ecology of the chequered butterfly Carterocephalus palaemon in Scotland. Microhabitat. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31: 613-622.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Sajovic, G. 1910: Naravoslovni oddelek, Zoologična zbirka: brezvretenčarji. In: Mantuani, J. (ed.): Poročilo o deželnem muzeju »Rudolfinum« za l. 1909. Carniola, Nova vrsta, Muzejsko društvo za Kranjsko, Ljubljana, L. I., Zvezek 1: 39-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. SBN (Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz), 1987: Tagfalter und ihre Lebensräume. Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz, Basel, 516 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Schneider, C. 2003: The influence of spatil scale on quantifying insect dispersal: an analysis of butterfly data. Ecological Entomology, 28: 252-256.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Schneider, C., Dover, J. & Fry, G.L.A. 2003: Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area. Ecological Entomology, 28: 219-227.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Schwarzwälder, B., Lörtscher, M., Erhardt, A. & Zettel, J. 1997: Habitat utilization by the Heath Fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia ssp. celadussa (Rott.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in montane grasslands of different management. Biological Conservation, 82: 157-165.10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00023-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Scott, J.A. 1975: Flight patterns among eleven species of diurnal Lepidoptera. Ecology, 56: 1367-1377.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Seliškar, T., Vreš, B., Seliškar, A. 2003: FloVegSi 2.0. Računalniški program za urejanje in analizo bioloških podatkov. Biološki inštitut ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana.
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. Singer, M.C. 1989: Butterfly-Hostplant Relationships: Host Quality, Adult Choice and Larval Success. In: Vane-Wright, R.I. & Ackery, P.R. (eds.): The biology of Butterflies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 81-88.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. SPSS Inc., 1989-2004: SPSS 13.0 for Windows. Release 13.0 (1 Sept 2004).
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Staub, R. & Aistleitner, U. 2006: Das Moor-Wiesenvögelschen - oder worauf es im grenzüberschreitenden Artenschutz ankommt. In: Broggi, M.F. (ed.): Alpenrheintal - eine Region im Umbau. Analysen und Perspektiven der räumlichen Entwicklung. Verlag der Liechtensteinischen Akademischen Gesselschaft, pp. 245-254.
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. Tabashnik, B.E. 1980: Population Structure of Pierid Butterflies. III. Pest Populations of Colias eriphyle.Oecologia, 47: 175-183.
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. Tregubov, V. 1957: Gozdne rastlinske združbe. In: Inštitut za gozdno in lesno gospodarstvo Slovenije (ed.): Prebiralni gozdovi na Snežniku. Vegetacijska in gozdnogospodarska monografija. Kmečka knjiga, Ljubljana, pp. 23-63.
    Search in Google Scholar
  74. Trpin, D. & Vreš, B. 1995: Register flore Slovenije. Praprotnice in cvetnice. (Register of the Flora of Slovenia. Ferns and Vascular Plants). Znanstvenoraziskovalni center SAZU, Zbirka 7, Ljubljana, 153 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  75. Tshikolovets, V. V. 2003: Butterflies of Eastern Europe, Urals and Caucasus. Brno, 176 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M. & Webb, D. A. (Eds.) 1980: Flora Europaea, Volume 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 452 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. Välimäki, P. & Itämies, J. 2003: Migration of the clouded Apollo butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne in a network of suitable habitats - effects of patch characteristics. Ecography, 26: 679-691.
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. van Halder, I., Barbaro, L., Corcket E. & Jactel H. 2008: Importance of semi-natural habitats for the conservation of butterfly communities in landscapes dominated by pine plantations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17:1149-1169.
    Search in Google Scholar
  79. van Sway, C.A.M. & Warren, M.S. 1999: Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment, 99: 1-260.
    Search in Google Scholar
  80. Vozar, A., Örvössy, N., Kocsis, M., Korösi, A. & Peregovits, L. 2005: First results of a study on Coenonympha oedippus in Hungary. In: Kühn, E., Feldmann, R., Thomas, J. & Settele, J. (eds.): Studies in the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. Vol.1: General concepts and case studies. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow, pp. 120.
    Search in Google Scholar
  81. Weidemann, H. J. 1995: Tagfalter: beobachten, bestimmen. 2., völlig neu bearb. Aufl. Naturbuch Verlag, Augsburg, 659 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  82. White, G. 2008: Program MARK. Version 5.1 ( http//www.cnr.colostate.edu/~gwhite
    Search in Google Scholar
  83. Wiklund, C. 2003: Sexual selection and the evolution of butterfly mating systems. In: Boggs, C.L., Watt, W.B. & Ehrlich, P.R. (eds.): Butterflies. Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 67-90.
    Search in Google Scholar
  84. Winiarska, G. 2001: Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) in Narew National Park. Fragmenta faunistica, 44: 73-78.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10028-009-0007-x | Journal eISSN: 1854-9829 | Journal ISSN: 1581-4661
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 115 - 128
Published on: Jan 14, 2010
Published by: Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Mark-release-recapture,
Coenonympha oedippus,
microdistribution of adults,
within-patch movements,
vegetation structure,
Ljubljansko barje
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2010 Tatjana Čelik, Branko Vreš, Andrej Seliškar, published by Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 8 (2009): Issue 2 (December 2009)