Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Outcome of MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy - initial experience at Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia Cover

Outcome of MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy - initial experience at Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia

Radiology and Oncology
Volume 46 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)
By: ,  ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|May 2012
References

References

  1. Podobnik J, Kocijancic I, Kovac V, Sersa I. 3T MRI in evaluation of asbestosrelated thoracic diseases - preliminary results.2010;: 92-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Stanic K, Kovac V. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small-cell lung cancer: the experience at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana.2010;: 180-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study.2007;: 485-92.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Lehman CD, Deperi ER, Peacock S, McDonough MD, Demartini WB, Shook J. Clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.2005;: 1782-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Lehman CD, DeMartini W, Anderson BO, Edge SB. Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer.2009;: 193-201.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, Verdecchia A, Santaquilani M, Musumeci R, et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results.2007;: 698-715.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size.2006;: 426-30.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, Causer PA, Zubovits JT, Jong RA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.2004;: 1317-25.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group.2010;: 1296-316.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A, Schaumlöffel U, Viehweg P, Buchmann J, Lampe D, et al. MR-guided percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy of breast lesions.1999;: 1656-65.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Prat X, Sittek H, Grosse A, Baath L, Perlet C, Alberich T, et al. European quadricentric evaluation of a breast MR biopsy and localization device: technical improvements based on phase I evaluation.2002;: 1720-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Fukuma E. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a non-titanium needle.2007;: 259-64.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions.2006;: 982-90.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Sinnatamby R, Lebeau A, Lebrecht A, Britton PD, Schreer I. Consensus Group Interdisciplinary consensus on the uses and technique of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): results of a European consensus meeting.2009;: 289-94.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schaumlöffel-Schulze U, Heinig A, Beck RM, Lampe D, Buchmann J. MR-guided percutaneous vacuum biopsy of breast lesions: experiences with 100 lesions. [Abstract].1999;: 289.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, Thornton C, Dershaw DD. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-Assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical Experience.2005;: 183-93.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Orel SG, Rosen M, Mies C, Schnall MD. MR imaging-guided-9-gauge vasuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.2006;: 54-61.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions.2006;: 982-90.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Sakamoto M, Sakamoto N, Mizuuchi N, Fukuma E. Magnetic resonance-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results in 100 Japanese women.2010;: 527-33.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Noroozian M, Gombos EC, Chikarmane S, Georgian-Smith D, Raza S, Denison CM, et al. Factors that impact the duration of MRI-guided core needle biopsy.2010;: 150-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. American College of Radiology.Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Kuhl CK, Shild HH, Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.2005;: 789-800.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Goto M, Ito H, Akazawa K, Kubota T, Kizu O, Yamada K, et al. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.2007;: 104-12.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Sohns C, Scherrer M, Staab W, Obenauer S. Value of the BI-RADS Classification in MR-mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors.2011;: 2475-83.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Zebic-Sinkovec M, Kadivec M, Podobnik G, Skof E, Snoj M. Mammographycally occult high grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as second primary breast cancer, detected with MRI, a case report.2010;: 228-31.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA. Nonmass lesions in magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: additionhal T2-weigted images improve diagnostic accuracy.2011;: 361-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Jansen SA, Paunesku T, Fan X, Woloschak GE, Vogt S, Conzen SD, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: x-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model.2009;: 399-406.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. CK Kuhl: Why do purely intraductal cancers enhance on breast MR Images?2009;: 281-3.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Mossa-Basha M, Fundaro GM, Shah BA, Ali S, Pantelic MV. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation.2010;: 1673-87.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Newstead GM. MR Imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ.2010;: 225-40.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Miklavcic D, Towhidi L. Numerical study of the electroporation pulse shape effect on molecular uptake of biological cells.2010;: 34-41.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Li J, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Kaplan J, Morris EA. MRI follow-up after concordant, histologically benign diagnosis of breast lesions sampled by MRI-guided biopsy.2009;: 850-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10019-012-0016-0 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 97 - 105
Published on: May 11, 2012
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
breast cancer,
MRI,
MRI guided vacuum assisted biopsy
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Radiology

© 2012 Marta Zebic-Sinkovec, Kristijana Hertl, Maksimiljan Kadivec, Mihael Cavlek, Gasper Podobnik, Marko Snoj, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 46 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)
Previous article
Next article