Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Lucifer Yellow uptake by CHO cells exposed to magnetic and electric pulses Cover

Lucifer Yellow uptake by CHO cells exposed to magnetic and electric pulses

Radiology and Oncology
Volume 46 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Feb 2012
References

References

  1. Barnes FS, Greenebaum B.Third edition. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis group, CRC Press; 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Cameron IL, Short NJ, Markov MS. Safe alternative cancer therapy using electromagnetic fields2007;: 453-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Pope J.Portsmouth: Heinemann; 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Adey WR.Third edition. New York: Elsevier; 2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH. Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric field.1982;: 841-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Neumann, E, Kakorin S, Tönsing K. Fundamentals of electroporative delivery of drugs and genes.1999;: 3-16.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Teissié J, Rols MP. An experimental evaluation of the critical potential difference inducing cell membrane electropermeabilization.1993;: 409-13.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Kotnik T, Pucihar G, Rebersek M, Mir LM, Miklavcic D. Role of pulse shape in cell membrane electropermeabilization.2003;: 193-200.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Valic B, Golzio M, Pavlin M, Schatz A, Faurie C, Gabriel B, et al. Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment.2003;: 519-28.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Miklavcic D, Towhidi L. Numerical study of the electroporation pulse shape effect on molecular uptake of biological cells.2010;: 34-41.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Faurie C, Golzio M, Phez E, Teissié J, Rols MP. Electric field induced cell membrane permeabilization and gene transfer: theory and experiments.2005;: 179-86.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Teissie J, Eynard N, Vernhes MC, Bénichou A, Ganeva V, Galutzov B, et al. Recent biotechnological developments of electropulsation. A prospective review.2002;: 107-12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Sersa G, Miklavcic D, Cemazar M, Rudolf Z, Pucihar G, Snoj M. Electrochemotherapy in treatment of tumours.2008;: 232-40.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Mir LM. Bases and rationale of the electrochemotherapy.2006;: 38-44.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Miklavčič D, Snoj M, Županič A, Kos B, Čemažar M, Kropivnik M, et al. Towards treatment planning and treatment of deep-seated solid tumors by electrochemotherapy.2010;: 10.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. He J, Wang X, Guan H, Chen W, Wang M, Wu H, et al. Clinical efficacy of local targeted chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer.2011;: 123-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Chiarella P, Fazio VM, Signori E. Application of electroporation in DNA vaccination protocols.2010;: 281-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Prud'homme GJ, Glinka Y, Khan AS, Draghia-Akli R. Electroporation-enhanced nonviral gene transfer for the prevention or treatment of immunological, endocrine and neoplastic diseases.2006;: 243-73.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Cemazar M, Golzio M, Sersa G, Rols MP, Teissié J. Electrically-assisted nucleic acids delivery to tissues in vivo: where do we stand?2006;: 3817-25.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Andre FM, Mir LM. Nucleic acids electrotransfer in vivo: mechanisms and practical aspects.2010;: 267-80.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Pavlin D, Cemazar M, Cör A, Sersa G, Pogacnik A, Tozon N. Electrogene therapy with interleukin-12 in canine mast cell tumors.2011;: 30-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Böckmann RA, Groot BL, Kakorin S, Neumann E, Grubmüller H. Kinetics, statistics, and energetics of lipid membrane electroporation studied by molecular dynamics simulations.2008;: 1837-50.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Rosemberg Y, Korenstein R. Incorporation of macromolecules into cells and vesicles by low electric fields: induction of endocytotic-like process.1997;: 275-81.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Antov Y, Barbul A, Korenstein R. Electroendocytosis: stimulation of adsorptive and fluid-phase uptake by pulsed low electric fields.2004;: 348-62.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Antov Y, Barbul A, Mantsur H, Korenstein R. Electroendocytosis: exposure of cells to pulsed low electric fields enhances adsorption and uptake of macromolecules.2005;: 2206-22.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Mahrour N, Pologea-Moraru R, Moisescu MG, Orlowski S, Leveque P, Mir LM. In vitro increase of the fluid-phase endocytosis induced by pulsed radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: importance of the electric field component.2005;: 126-37.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Marszalek P, Tsong TY. Cell fission and formation of mini cell bodies by high frequency alternating electric field.1995;: 1218-21.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain.2000;: 147-50.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Sinclair C, Faulkner D, Hammond G. Flexible real-time control of MagStim 200(2) units for use in transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.2006;: 133-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini P, Pascual-Leone A. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.2009;: 2008-39.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Jalinous R. Technical and practical aspects of magnetic nerve stimulation.1991;: 10-25.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Roth y, Zangen A, Hallett M. A coil design for transcranial magnetic stimulation of deep brain regions.2002;: 361-70.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Ravazzani P, Ruohonen J, Grandori F, Tognola G. Magnetic stimulation of the nervous system: induced electric field in unbounded, semi-infinite, spherical, and cylindrical media.1996;: 606-16.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Salinas FS, Lancaster JL, Fox PT. Detailed 3D models of the induced electric field of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils.2007;: 2879-92.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Macek-Lebar A, Sersa G, Kranjc S, Groselj A, Miklavcic D. Optimisation of pulse parameters in vitro for in vivo electrochemotherapy.2002;: 1731-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Towhidi L, Kotnik T, Pucihar G, Firoozabadi SMP, Mozdarani H, Miklavcic D. Variability of the minimal transmembrane voltage resulting in detectable membrane electroporation.2008;: 372-85.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Marjanovič I, Haberl S, Miklavčič D, Kandušer M, Pavlin M. Analysis and comparison of electrical pulse parameters for gene electrotransfer of two different cell lines.2010;: 97-105.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Usaj M, Torkar D, Kanduser Mm Miklavcic D. Cell counting tool parameters optimization approach for electroporation efficiency determination of attached cells in phase contrast images.2011;: 303-14.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Stewart WW. Functional connexions between cells as revealed by dye coupling with a highly fluorescent naphthalamide tracer.1978;: 741-59.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Stewart WW. Lucifer dyes highly fluorescent dyes for biological tracing.1981;: 17-21.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Puc M, Kotnik T, Mir LM, Miklavčič D. Quantitative model of small molecules uptake after in vitro cell electropermeabilization.2003;: 1-10.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Pucihar G, Kotnik T, Kanduser M, Miklavcic D. The influence of medium conductivity on electropermeabilization and survival of cells in vitro.2001;: 107-15.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Kotnik T, Pucihar G, Miklavčič D. Induced transmembrane voltage and its correlation with electroporation-mediated molecular transport.2010;: 3-13.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Pucihar G, Krmelj J, Reberšek M, Batista Napotnik T, Miklavčič D. Equivalent pulse parameters for electroporation.2011;: 3279-88.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Rols MP, Femenia P, Teissié J. Long-lived macropinocytosis takes place in electropermeabilized mammalian cells.1995;: 26-38.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Zimmermann U, Schnettler R, Klöck G, Watzka H, Donath E, Glaser RW. Mechanisms of electrostimulated uptake of macromolecules into living cells.1990;: 543-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Glogauer M, Lee W, McCulloch CA. Induced endocytosis in human fibroblasts by electrical fields.1993;: 232-40.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Escoffre JM, Dean DS, Hubert M. Rols MP, Favard C. Membrane perturbation by an external electric field: a mechanism to permit molecular uptake.2007;: 973-83.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Timothy EV, Weaver JC. Molecular change due to biomagnetic stimulation and transient magnetic fields: mechanical interference constraints on possible effects by cell membrane pore creation via magnetic particles.1998;: 121-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10019-012-0014-2 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 119 - 125
Published on: Feb 6, 2012
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
electroporation,
electro-endocytosis,
time-varying magnetic field,
transmembrane molecular transport
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Radiology

© 2012 Leila Towhidi, Seyed Firoozabadi, Hossein Mozdarani, Damijan Miklavcic, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 46 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)
Previous article
Next article