MRI in evaluation of perianal fistulae
By: Amela Sofic, Serif Beslic, Nedzad Sehovic, Jasmin Caluk and Damir Sofic
Open Access
|Oct 2010References
- Whiteford MH. Perianal abscess/fistula disease.2007;: 102-9.
- Sainio P. Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects.1984;: 219-24.
- Jones J, Tremaine W. Evaluation of perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease.2005;: 16.
- Sofić A, Šehović N, Bešlić Š, Prnjavorac B, Bilalović N, Čaluk J, et al. MR rectum imaging with ultra sound gel as instrumental contrast media in tubulovillous adenoma.2008;: 136-42.
- Kuijpers HC, Schulpen T. Fistulography for fistula-in-ano. Is it useful?1985;: 103-4.
- Weisman RI, Orsay CP, Pearl RK, Abcarian H. The role of fistulography in fistula-in-ano. Report of five cases.1991;: 181-4.
- Lunniss PJ, Armstrong P, Barker PG, Reznek RH, Phillips RK. Magnetic resonance imaging of anal fistulae.1992;: 394-6.
- Lunniss PJ, Barker PG, Sultan AH, Armstrong P, Reznek RH, Bartram CI, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano.1994;: 708-18.
- Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in ano.2006;: 18-33.
- Hussain SM, Stoker J, Schouten WR, Hop WC, Lameris JS. Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification.1996;: 475-81.
- Spencer JA, Ward J, Beckingham IJ, Adams C, Ambrose NS. Dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of perianal fistulas.1996;: 735-41.
- Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D, Ward J, Windsor AC, Ambrose NS. Outcome after surgery for perianal fistula: Predictive value of MR imaging.1998;: 403-6.
- Yee LF, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW. Use of endoanal ultrasound in patients with rectovaginal fistulas.1999;: 1057-64.
- Gustafsson UM, Kahvecioglu B, Astrom G, Ahlstrom H, Graf W. Endoanal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of anal fistula: a comparative study.2001;: 189-97.
- Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM, Fletcher JG, Clain JE, Tremaine WJ, et al. A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn's perianal fistulas.2001;: 1064-72.
- Maier AG, Funovics MA, Kreuzer SH, Herbst F, Wunderlich M, Teleky BK, et al. Evaluation of perianal sepsis: comparison of anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging.2001;: 254-260.
- Gravante G, Giordano P. The role of three-dimensional endoluminal ultrasound imaging in the evaluation of anorectal diseases: a review.2008;: 1570-8.
- Schratter-Sehn AU, Lochs H, Vogelsang H, Schurawitzki H, Herold C, Schratter M. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus computed tomography in the differential diagnosis of perianorectal complications in Crohn's disease.1993;: 582-6.
- Schaefer O, Lohrmann C, Langer M. Assessment of anal fistulas with highresolution subtraction MR-fistulography: comparison with surgical findings.2004;: 91-8.
- Botros M, Quevedo JF, Miller RC. Angiosarcoma of the liver after multimodality therapy for gallbladder carcinoma.2009;: 126-31.
- Piekarski JH, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Nejc D, Pluta P, Szymczak W, Sek P, et al. Does fecal diversion offer any chance for spontaneous closure of the radiation-induced rectovaginal fistula?2008;: 66-70.
Language: English
Page range: 220 - 227
Published on: Oct 14, 2010
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2010 Amela Sofic, Serif Beslic, Nedzad Sehovic, Jasmin Caluk, Damir Sofic, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.