Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cell size dynamics and viability of cells exposed to hypotonic treatment and electroporation for electrofusion optimization Cover

Cell size dynamics and viability of cells exposed to hypotonic treatment and electroporation for electrofusion optimization

Radiology and Oncology
Volume 43 (2009): Issue 2 (June 2009)
By: Marko Ušaj,  Katja Trontelj,  Rosana Hudej,  Maša Kandušer and  Damijan Miklavčič  
Open Access
|Jun 2009

References

  1. Chang DC, Chassy BM, Saunders JA, Sowers AE. Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion. San Diego: Academic Press; 1992.10.1016/B978-0-12-168040-4.50004-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Hui SW, Stenger DA. Electrofusion of cells: Hybridoma production by electrofusion and polyethylene glycol. Method Enzymol 1993; 220: 212-27.10.1016/0076-6879(93)20084-G
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Zimmermann U, Friedrich U, Mussauer H, Gessner P, Hämel K, Sukhorukov V. Electromanipulation of mammalian cells: Fundamentals and application. IEEE IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 2000; 28: 72-82.10.1109/27.842868
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Zimmermann U. Electric field-mediated fusion and related electrical phenomena. Biochim Biophys Acta 1982; 694: 227-77.10.1016/0304-4157(82)90007-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Teissie J, Rols MP. Fusion of mammalian cells in culture is obtained by creating the contact between cells after their electropermeabilization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1986; 140: 258-66.10.1016/0006-291X(86)91084-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Neumann E, Kakorin S. Digression on membrane electroporation and electroporative delivery of drugs and genes. Radiol Oncol 1998; 32: 7-17.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Rudolf Z, Stabuc R, Cemazar M, Miklavcic D, Vodovnik L, Sersa G. Electrochemotherapy with bleomycin. The first clinical experience in malignant melanoma patients. Radiol Oncol 1995; 29: 229-35.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Cemazar M, Miklavcic D, Vodovnik L, Jarm T, Rudolf Z, Stabuc R, et al. Improved therapeutic effect of electrochemotherapy with cisplatin by intratumoral drug administration and changing of electrode orientation for electropermeabilization on EAT tumor model in mice. Radiol Oncol 1995; 29: 121-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Sersa G, Cemazar M, Miklavcic D. Tumor blood flow modifying effects of electrochemotherapy: a potential vascular targeted mechanism. Radiol Oncol 2003; 37: 43-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Sersa G, Cemazar M, Miklavcic D, Rudolf Z. Electrochemotherapy of tumours. Radiol Oncol 2006; 40: 163-74.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Pavselj N, Miklavcic D. Numerical modeling in electroporation-based biomedical applications. Radiol Oncol 2008; 42: 159-68.10.2478/v10019-008-0008-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Zupanic A, Corovic S, Miklavcic D. Optimization of electrode position and electric pulse amplitude in electrochemotherapy. Radiol Oncol 2008; 42: 93-101.10.2478/v10019-008-0005-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Tsong TY. Electroporation of cell membranes. Biophys J 1991; 60: 297-306.10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82054-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Teissié J, Rols M. An experimental evaluation of the critical potential difference inducing cell membrane electropermeabilization. Biophys J 1993; 65: 409-413.10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81052-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Weaver JC, Chizmadzhev YA. Theory of electroporation: A review. Bioelectrochem Bioener 1996; 41: 135-60.10.1016/S0302-4598(96)05062-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Neumann E, Sowers AE, Jordan CA. Electroporation and electrofusion in cell biology. New York: Plenum Press; 1989.10.1007/978-1-4899-2528-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Cemazar M, Jarm T, Miklavcic D, Macek-Lebar A, Ihan A, Kopitar NA, et al. Effect of electric-field intensity on electropermeabilization and electrosensitivity of various tumor-cell lines in vitro. Electro Magnetobiol 1998; 17: 263-72.10.3109/15368379809022571
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Canatella PJ, Karr JF, Petros JA, Prausnitz MR. Quantitative study of electroporation-mediated molecular uptake and cell viability. Biophys J 2001; 80: 755-64.10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76055-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Macek-Lebar A, Miklavcic D. Cell electropermeabilization to small molecules in vitro: control by pulse parameters. Radiol Oncol 2001; 35: 193-202.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Cegovnik U, Novakovic S. Setting optimal parameters for in vitro electrotransfection of B16F1, SA1, LPB, SCK, L929 and CHO cells using predefined exponentially decaying electric pulses. Bioelectrochemistry 2004; 62: 73-82.10.1016/j.bioelechem.2003.10.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Kanduser M, Sentjurc M, Miklavcic D. Cell membrane fluidity related to electroporation and resealing. Eur Biophys J 2006; 35: 196-204.10.1007/s00249-005-0021-y
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Vienken J, Zimmermann U. An improved electrofusion technique for production of mouse hybridoma cells. FEBS Lett 1985; 182: 278-80.10.1016/0014-5793(85)80315-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Mally MI, McKnight ME, Glassy MC. Protocols of electroporation and electrofusion for producing human hybridomas. In: Chang D, Chassy B, Saunders J, Sowers A, editors. Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion. San Diego: Academic Press; 1992. p. 507-22.10.1016/B978-0-12-168040-4.50035-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Scott-Taylor TH, Pettengell R, Clarke I, Stuhler G, La Barthe MC, Walden P, et al. Human tumour and dendritic cell hybrids generated by electrofusion: potential for cancer vaccines. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000; 1500: 265-79.10.1016/S0925-4439(99)00108-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Hayashi T, Tanaka H, Tanaka J, Wang R, Averbook BJ, Cohen PA, et al. Immunogenicity and therapeutic efficacy of dendritic-tumor hybrid cells generated by electrofusion. Clin Immunol 2002; 104: 4-20.10.1006/clim.2002.522412139943
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Yu X, McGrawa PA, House FS, Crowe JE Jr. An optimized electrofusion-based protocol for generating virus-specific human monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol Methods 2008; 336: 142-51.10.1016/j.jim.2008.04.008251911718514220
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Ahkong QF, Lucy JA. Osmotic forces in artificially induced cell fusion. Biochim Biophys Acta 1986; 858: 206-16.10.1016/0005-2736(86)90308-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Schmitt JJ, Zimmermann U. Enhanced hybridoma production by electrofusion in strongly hypo-osmolar solutions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1989; 983: 42-50.10.1016/0005-2736(89)90378-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Zimmermann U, Gessner P, Schnettler R, Perkins S, Foung SK. Efficient hybridization of mouse-human cell lines by means of hypoosmolar electrofusion. J Immunol Methods 1990; 134: 43-50.10.1016/0022-1759(90)90110-H
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Foung S, Perkins S, Kafadar K, Gessner P, Zimmermann U. Development of microfusion techniques to generate human hybridomas. J Immunol Methods 1990; 134: 35-42.10.1016/0022-1759(90)90109-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Rols MP, Teissié J. Modulation of electrically induced permeabilization and fusion of Chinese hamster ovary cells by osmotic pressure. Biochemistry 1990; 29: 4561-7.10.1021/bi00471a0092372540
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Rehman SMM, Perkins S, Zimmermann U, Foung SKH. Human hybridoma formation by hypo-osmolar electrofusion. In: Chang D, Chassy B, Saunders J, Sowers A, editors. Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion. Academic Press; 1992. p. 523-33.10.1016/B978-0-12-168040-4.50036-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Sukhorukov VL, Reuss R, Zimmermann D, Held C, Müller KJ, Kiesel M, et al. Surviving high-intensity field pulses: Strategies for improving robustness and performance of electrotransfection and electrofusion. J Membr Biol 2005; 206: 187-201.10.1007/s00232-005-0791-216456714
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Sukhorukov VL, Reuss R, Endter JM, Fehrmann S, Katsen-Globa A, Geßner P, et al. A biophysical approach to the optimisation of dendritictumour cell electrofusion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 346: 829-39.10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.19316780801
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Kiesel M, Reuss R, Zimmermann D, Zimmermann H, Shirakashi R, Bamberg E, et al. Biophys J 2006; 90: 4720-9.10.1529/biophysj.105.078725147185616565059
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Pavlin M, Kanduser M, Rebersek M, Pucihar G, Hart FX, Magjarevic R, et al. Effect of cell electroporation on the conductivity of a cell suspension. Biophys J 2005; 88: 4378-439.10.1529/biophysj.104.048975130566515792975
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Gillies RJ, Didier N, Denton M. Determination of cell number in monolayer cultures. Anal Biochem 1986; 159: 109-13.10.1016/0003-2697(86)90314-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Sarkadi B, Attisano L, Grinstein S, Buchwald M, Rothstein A. Volume regulation of Chinese hamster ovary cells in anisoosmotic buffer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1984; 774: 159-68.10.1016/0005-2736(84)90287-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Barrau C, Teissié J, Gabriel B. Osmotically induced membrane tension facilitates the triggering of living cell electropermeabilization. Bioelectrochemistry 2004; 63: 327-32.10.1016/j.bioelechem.2003.11.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Reuss R, Ludwig J, Shirakashi R, Ehrhart F, Zimmermann H, Schneider S, et al. Intracellular delivery of carbohydrates into mammalian cells through swelling-activated pathways. J Membr Biol 2004; 200: 67-81.10.1007/s00232-004-0694-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Zimmermann D, Terpitz U, Zhou A, Reuss R, Müller K, Sukhorukov VL, et al. Biophysical characterisation of electrofused giant HEK293-cells as a novel electrophysiological expression system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 348: 673-81.10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.07.112
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Knutton S, Jackson D, Graham JM, Micklem KJ, Pasternak CA. Microvilli and cell swelling. Nature 1976; 262: 52-4.10.1038/262052a0
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Sukhorukov VL, Arnold WM, Zimmermann U. Hypotonically induced changes in the plasma membrane of cultured mammalian cells. J Membr Biol 1993; 132: 27-40.10.1007/BF00233049
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Evans EA, Parsegian VA. Thermal-mechanical fluctuations enhance repulsion between bimolecular layers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83: 7132-6.10.1073/pnas.83.19.7132
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. McIntosh TJ, Advani S, Burton RE, Zhelev DV, Needham D, Simon SA. Experimental test for protrusion and undulation pressures in phospholipid bilayers. Biochemistry 1995; 34: 8520-32.10.1021/bi00027a002
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. McIntosh TJ, Kulkarni KG, Simon SA. Membrane fusion promoters and inhibitors have contrasting effects on lipid bilayer structure and undulations. Biophys J 1999; 76: 2090-8.10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77365-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Golzio M, Mora MP, Raynaud C, Delteil C, Teissié J, Rols MP. Control by osmotic pressure of voltage-induced permeabilization and gene transfer in mammalian cells. Biophys J 1998; 74: 3015-22.10.1016/S0006-3495(98)78009-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Siebens AW, Spring KR. A novel sorbitol transport mechanism in cultured renal papillary epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 1989; 257(6 Pt 2): F937-46.10.1152/ajprenal.1989.257.6.F937
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Hall JA, Kirk J, Potts JR, Rae C Kirk K. Anion channel blockers inhibit swelling-activated anion, cation, and nonelectrolyte transport in HeLa cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 1996; 271: 579-88.10.1152/ajpcell.1996.271.2.C579
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Neil GA, Zimmermann U. Electrofusion. Methods Enzymol 1993; 220: 174.10.1016/0076-6879(93)20082-E
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Zimmermann U, Neil GA. Electromanipulation of Cells. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Kotnik T, Bobanovic F, Miklavcic D. Sensitivity of transmembrane voltage induced by applied electric fields - a theoretical analysis. Bioelectrochem Bioener 1997; 43: 285-91.10.1016/S0302-4598(97)00023-8
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10019-009-0017-9 | Journal eISSN: 1581-3207 | Journal ISSN: 1318-2099
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 108 - 119
Published on: Jun 8, 2009
Published by: Association of Radiology and Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
hypotonic treatment,
cell swelling,
regulatory volume decrease,
cell size measurements,
viability,
electrofusion,
electroporation
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Internal medicine,
Haematology, oncology,
Radiology

© 2009 Marko Ušaj, Katja Trontelj, Rosana Hudej, Maša Kandušer, Damijan Miklavčič, published by Association of Radiology and Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 43 (2009): Issue 2 (June 2009)