Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Formulation development of oral controlled release tablets of hydralazine: Optimization of drug release and bioadhesive characteristics Cover

Formulation development of oral controlled release tablets of hydralazine: Optimization of drug release and bioadhesive characteristics

Open Access
|Mar 2009

References

  1. Y. W. Chien, Rate-control drug delivery systems: Controlled release vs. sustained release,(1989) 21-46.
  2. Y. Song, Y. Wang, R. Thakur, V. M. Meidan and B. Michniak, Mucosal drug delivery: membranes, methodologies, and applications,(2004) 195-256; DOI: 10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v21.i3.20.
  3. B. Singh, S. K. Chakkal and N. Ahuja, Formulation and optimization of controlled release mucoadhesive tablets of atenolol using response surface methodology,(2006) E1-E10; DOI: 10.1208/pt070103.
  4. J. A. Oates and N. J. Brown,, in, 10ed. (Ed. J. G. Hardman and L. E. Limbird), Mc Graw Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York 2001, pp. 871-900.
  5. K. Wulff, K. Lenz, A. R. Krogsgaard and B. Holst, Hydralazine in arterial hypertension. Randomized, double-blind comparison between conventional and slow-release preparations,.(1980) 1862-1865.
  6. T. Talseth, P. Fauchald and J. F. Pape, Hydralazine slow-release: Observations on serum profile and clinical efficacy in man,(1977) 157-168.
  7. J. Adir, S. M. Janda, C. L. Curry, R. E. Taylor, C. D. Poku and K. S. Rotenberg, Comparative efficacy and safety of immediate-release and controlled-release hydralazine in black hypertensive patients,(1987) 640-650.
  8. J. H. Silas, L. E. Ramsay and S. Freestone, Hydralazine once daily in hypertension,(1982) 1602-1624.
  9. B. Singh, R. Kumar and N. Ahuja, Optimizing drug delivery systems using systematic "design of experiments". Part I: fundamental aspects,(2005) 27-105; DOI: 10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v22.i1.20.
  10. 22, USP Convention, Rockville 2004.
  11. B. Singh and S. Singh, A compreshensive computer program for study of drug release kinetics from compressed matrices,(1998) 313-316.
  12. B. Singh, T. Kaur and S. Singh, Correction of raw dissolution data for loss of drug during sampling,(1997) 196-199.
  13. R. W. Korsemeyer, R. Gurny, E. Doelker, P. Buri and N. Peppas, Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers,(1983) 23-35.
  14. B. Singh and N. Ahuja, Development of controlled-release buccoadhesive hydrophilic matrices of diltiazem hydrochloride: optimization of bioadhesion, dissolution, and diffusion parameters,(2002) 431-442; DOI: 10.1081/DDC-120003004.
  15. V. V. Yamsani, R. Gannu, C. Kolli, M. E. Rao and M. R. Yamsani, Development and in vitro evaluation of buccoadhesive carvedilol tablets,(2007) 185-197; DOI: 10.2478/v10007-007-0015-7.
  16. A. O. Nur and J. S. Zhang, Captopril floating and/or bioadhesive tablets: design and release kinetics,(2000) 965-969; DOI: 10.1081/DDC-100101323.
  17. B. Singh, M. Dahiya, V. Saharan and N. Ahuja, Optimizing drug delivery systems using systematic ≫design of experiments≪. Part II: retrospect and prospects,(2005) 215-294; DOI: 10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v22.i3.10.
  18. J. B. Schwartz and R. E. Connor,, in(Eds. G. S. Banker and C. T. Rhodes), Marcel Dekker, New York 1996, pp. 727-752.
  19. B. Singh, R. K. Gupta and N. Ahuja, Computer-assisted optimization of pharmaceutical formulations and processes, in Pharmaceutical Product Development (Ed. N. K. Jain), CBS Publishers, New Delhi 2006, pp. 273-318.
  20. M. J. Vazquaz, B. Perez Macros, J. L. Gomez-Amoza and N. A. Peppas, Influence of technological variables on release of drugs from hydrophilic matrices,(1992) 1355-1375.
  21. USFDA Guidance for Industry: Dissolution Testing of Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) (1997), Rockwille 1997.
  22. S. Chopra, G. V. Patil and S. K. Motwani, Release modulating hydrophilic matrix systems of losartan potassium: Optimization of formulation using statistical experimental design,(2007) 73-82; DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.09.001.
  23. B. Perez-Marcos, J. L. Ford, D. J. Armstrong, P. N. Elliott, C. Rostron and J. E. Hogan, Influence of pH on the release of propranolol hydrochloride from matrices containing hydroxypropylmethylcellulose K4M and carbopol 974,(1996) 330-334; DOI: 10.1021/js950359z.
  24. A. Nokhodchi, J. L. Ford and M. H. Rubinstein, Studies on the interaction between water and (hydroxypropyl)methylcellulose,(1997) 608-615; DOI: 10.1021/js960279a.
  25. G. Ponchel, F. Touchard, D. Duchene and N. A. Peppas, Bioadhesive analysis of controlled release systems. I. Fracture and interpenetration analysis in poly(acrylic acid) containing systems,(1987) 129-141; DOI: 10.1016/0168-3659(87)90004-6.
  26. F. Madson, K. Eberth and J. D. Smart, A rheological assessment of the nature of interactions between mucoadhesive polymers and a homogenised mucus gel,(1998) 1083-1092.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10007-009-0005-z | Journal eISSN: 1846-9558 | Journal ISSN: 1330-0075
Language: English, Croatian
Page range: 1 - 13
Published on: Mar 20, 2009
Published by: Croatian Pharmaceutical Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2009 Bhupinder Singh, Sonia Pahuja, Rishi Kapil, Naveen Ahuja, published by Croatian Pharmaceutical Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.