Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Algebraic approach for model decomposition: Application to fault detection and isolation in discrete-event systems Cover

Algebraic approach for model decomposition: Application to fault detection and isolation in discrete-event systems

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
Volume 21 (2011): Issue 1 (March 2011)
By: ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Mar 2011
References

References

  1. Bavishi, S. and Chong, E. (1994). Automated fault diagnosis using a discrete event systems framework,, pp. 213-218.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Benveniste, A., Fabre, E., Haar, S. and Jard, C. (2003). Diagnosis of asynchronous discrete event systems: A net unfolding approach,(5): 714-727.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Berdjag, D., Christophe, C. and Cocquempot, V. (2006a). An algebraic method for nonlinear system decomposition,, pp. 42-53.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Berdjag, D., Christophe, C. and Cocquempot, V. (2006b). Nonlinear model decomposition for fault detection and isolation system design,, pp. 3321-3326.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Berdjag, D., Christophe, C., Cocquempot, V. and Jiang, B. (2006c). Nonlinear model decomposition for robust fault detection and isolation using algebraic tools,(6): 1337-1353.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Blanke, M., Kinnaert, M., Lunze, J. and Staroswiecki, M. (2003)., Springer, Berlin.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Boel, R. and Jiroveanu, G. (2004). Distributed contextual diagnosis for very large systems,, pp. 343-348.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Boubour, R., Jard, C., Aghasaryan, A., Fabre, E. and Benveniste, A. (1997). A Petri net approach to fault detection and diagnosis in distributed systems (Parts 1 and 2),, pp. 720-731.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Chow, E. and Willsky, A. (1984). Analytical redundancy and the design of robust failure detection systems,(7): 603-614.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Cox, D., Little, J. and O'Shea, D. (1991)., Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Diop, S. (1991). Elimination in control theory,: 17-32.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Fliess, M. and Join, C. (2003). An algebraic approach to fault diagnosis for linear systems,, pp. 1-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Fliess, M., Join, C. and Sira-Ramírez, H. (2004). Robust residual generation for linear fault diagnosis: An algebraic setting with examples,(20): 1223-1242.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Gertler, J. (1991). Analytical redundancy methods in fault detection and isolation—Survey and synthesis,, Vol. 1, pp. 9-21.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Gertler, J. J. (1998)., Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Giua, A. (1997). Petri net state estimators based on event observation,, pp. 4086-4091.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Hadjicostis, C. and Verghese, G. (1999). Monitoring discrete event systems using Petri net embeddings,S. Donatelli and J. Kleijn (Eds.),, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1639, Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 188-207, DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48745-X_12.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Hammouri, H., Kinnaert, M. and El Yaagoubi, E. (2001). A geometric approach to fault detection and isolation for bilinear systems,(9): 1451-1455.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Hamscher, W., Console, L. and Kleer, J. D. (1992)., Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Hartmanis, J. and Stearns, R. (1966)., Prentice-Hall, New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Hillston, J. (1996)., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Isermann, R. (1984). Process fault-detection based on modelling and estimation methods—A survey,(4): 387-404.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Isermann, R. (2005). Model-based filt detection and analysis—Status and application,(1): 71-85.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Isermann, R. and Freyermuth, B. (1991). Process fault diagnosis based on process model knowledge, Part 1: Principles for fault diagnosis with parameter estimation,(4): 620-626.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Isidori, A. (1995)., 3rd Edn., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Jiang, B., Staroswiecki, M. and Cocquempot, V. (2004). Fault diagnosis based on adaptive observer for a class of nonlinear systems with unknown parameters,(4): 415-426.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Jiang, B., Staroswiecki, M. and Cocquempot, V. (2006). Fault accommodation for nonlinear dynamic systems,(9): 1578-1583.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Kinnaert, M. (1999). Robust fault detection based on observers for bilinear systems,(11): 1829-1842.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Lafortune, S., Teneketzis, D., Sengupta, R., Sampath, M. and Sinnamohideen, K. (2001). Failure diagnosis of dynamic systems: An approach based on discrete event systems,, pp. 2058-2071.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Lefebvre, D. (1999). Failure detection and isolation for manufacturing systems,: V.33-V.44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Leuschen, M., Walker, I. and Cavallaro, J. (2005). Fault residual generation via nonlinear analytical redundancy,(3): 452-458.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Lin, F. (1994). Diagnosability of discrete event systems and its applications,(2): 197-212, DOI: 10.1007/BF01441211.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Lootsma, T. (2001)., Ph.D. thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Maquin, D., Cocquempot, V., Cassar, J., Staroswiecki, M. and Ragot, J. (1997). Generation of analytical redundancy relations for FDI purposes,, pp. 270-276.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Maquin, D., Luong, M. and Ragot, J. (1997). Fault detection and isolation and sensor network design,(2): 393-406.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Patton, R. (1994). Robust model-based fault diagnosis: The state of the art,, Vol. 1, pp. 1-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Sampath, M., Sengupta, R., Lafortune, S., Sinnamohideen, K. and Teneketzis, D. (1995). Diagnosability of discreteevent systems,(9): 1555-1575.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Sampath, M., Sengupta, R., Lafortune, S., Sinnamohideen, K. and Teneketzis, D. (1996). Failure diagnosis using discrete-event models,(2): 105-124.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Shumsky, A. (1991). Fault isolation in nonlinear dynamic systems by functional diagnosis,: 148-155.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Shumsky, A. (2007). Redundancy relations for fault diagnosis in nonlinear uncertain systems,(4): 477-489, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-007-0040-1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Shumsky, A. and Zhirabok, A. (2006). Nonlinear diagnostic filter design: Algebraic and geometric points of view,(1): 115-127.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Staroswiecki, M. and Comtet-Varga, G. (2001). Analytical redundancy relations for fault detection and isolation in algebraic dynamic systems,(5): 687-699.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Vereshchagin, N. and Shen, A. (2002)., Student Mathematical Library, Vol 17, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Zad, H., Kwong, R. and Wonham, W. (2003). Fault diagnosis in discrete-event systems: Framework and model reduction,(7): 1199-1212.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Zad, S. H. (1999)., Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Zhirabok, A. (2006). Nonlinear dynamic systems: Their canonical decomposition based on invariant functions,(4): 517-528.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Zhirabok, A. and Shumsky, A. (1993). A new mathematical techniques for nonlinear systems research,, pp. 485-488.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-011-0008-z | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 109 - 125
Published on: Mar 28, 2011
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
algebraic approaches,
decomposition methods,
decoupling,
discrete-event systems
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Applied mathematics

© 2011 Denis Berdjag, Vincent Cocquempot, Cyrille Christophe, Alexey Shumsky, Alexey Zhirabok, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 21 (2011): Issue 1 (March 2011)
Previous article
Next article