Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of agent-based simulated annealing and tabu search procedures to solving the data reduction problem Cover

Application of agent-based simulated annealing and tabu search procedures to solving the data reduction problem

Open Access
|Mar 2011

References

  1. Aarts, E. and van Laarhoven, P. (1987). Simulated anealing: A pedestrian review of the theory and some applications,J. Kittler and P. A. Devijver (Eds.),, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  2. Aha, D., Kibler, D. and Albert, M. (1999). Instance-based learning algorithms,(1): 37-66.
  3. Aksela, M. (2007)., Ph.D. thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki.
  4. Asuncion, A. and Newman, D. (2007). Website of the UCI Machine Learning Repository
  5. Barbucha, D., Czarnowski, I., Jędrzejowicz, P., Ratajczak-Ropel, E. and Wierzbowska, I. (2009). e-JABAT—An implementation of the Web-based A-Team,N. Nguyen and L. Jain (Eds.),, Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 167, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 57-86.
  6. Bellifemine, F., Caire, G., Poggi A. and Rimassa, G. (2003). Jade. A white paper,, September 2003, pp. 6-19
  7. Bezdek, J. and Kuncheva, L. (2001). Nearest prototype classifier designs: An experimental study,(2): 1445-1473.
  8. Bhanu, B. and Peng, J. (2000). Adaptive integration image segmentation and object recognition,(4): 427-44.
  9. Bull, L. (2004). Learning classifier systems: A brief introduction,L. Bull (Ed.),, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Springer, Berlin, pp. 3-14.
  10. Czarnowski, I. (2010). Prototype selection algorithms for distributed learning,(6): 2292-2300.
  11. Czarnowski, I. and Jędrzejowicz, P. (2004). An approach to instance reduction in supervised learning,F. Coenen, A. Preece and A. Macintosh (Eds.),, Springer, London, pp. 267-282.
  12. Czarnowski, I. and Jędrzejowicz, P. (2010). An approach to data reduction and integrated machine classification,(1): 21-40.
  13. Dash, M. and Liu, H. (1997). Feature selection for classification,(3): 131-156.
  14. DataSet, C. (2009). Website of the Datasets Used for Classification: Comparison of Results
  15. Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance,(200): 675-701.
  16. Glover, F. (1989). Tabu search, Part I,(3): 533-549.
  17. Glover, F. (1990). Tabu search, Part II,(1): 4-32.
  18. Glover, F. and Laguna, M. (1993). Tabu search,C. Reeves (Ed.),, John Wiley and Sons, New Jork, NY, pp. 70-150.
  19. Hamo, Y. and Markovitch, S. (2005). The COMPSET algorithm for subset selection,, pp. 728-733.
  20. Hart, P. (1968). The condensed nearest neighbour rule,: 515-516.
  21. Jędrzejowicz, P. (1999). Social learning algorithm as a tool for solving some difficult scheduling problems,(2): 51-66.
  22. Kim, S.-W. and Oommen, B. (2003). A brief taxonomy and ranking of creative prototype reduction schemes,(3): 232-244.
  23. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. and Vecci, M. (1983). Optimisation by simulated annealing,(4598): 671-680.
  24. Kohavi, R. and John, G. (1997). Wrappers for feature subset selection,(1-2): 273-324.
  25. Kuncheva, L. and Bezdek, J. (1998). Nearest prototype classification: Clustering, genetic algorithm or random search?,(1): 160-164.
  26. Kuncheva, L. and Jain, L. (1999). Nearest-neighbor classifier: Simultaneous editing and feature selection,(11-13): 1149-1156.
  27. Michalewicz, Z. (1996)., Springer, Berlin.
  28. Nanni, L. and Lumini, A. (2009). Particle swarm optimization for prototype reduction,(4-6): 1092-1097.
  29. Quinlan, J. (1993)., Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.
  30. Raman, B. (2003). Enhancing learning using feature and example selection,, Texas AM University, College Station, TX.
  31. Ritter, G., Woodruff, H., Lowry, S. and Isenhour, T. (1975). An algorithm for a selective nearest decision rule,(6): 665-669.
  32. Rozsypal, A. and Kubat, M. (2003). Selecting representative examples and attributes by a genetic algorithm,(4): 291-304.
  33. Sahel, Z., Bouchachia, A., Gabrys, B. and Rogers, P. (2007). Adaptive mechanisms for classification problems with drifting data,B. Apolloni, R. Howlett and L. Jain (Eds.),, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 4693, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 419-426.
  34. Skalak, D. (1994). Prototype and feature selection by sampling and random mutation hill climbing algorithm,, pp. 293-301.
  35. Song, H. and Lee, S. (1996). LVQ combined with simulated annealing for optimal design of large set reference models,(2): 329-336.
  36. Talukdar, S., Baerentzen, L., Gove, A. and de Souza, P. (1996). Asynchronous teams: Co-operation schemes for autonomous, computer-based agents,, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
  37. Wilson, D. and Martinez, T. (2000a). An integrated instancebased learning algorithm,(1): 1-28.
  38. Wilson, D. and Martinez, T. (2000b). Reduction techniques for instance-based learning algorithm,(3): 257-286.
  39. Zongker, D. and Jain, A. (1996). Algorithm for feature selection: An evaluation,, pp. 18-22.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-011-0004-3 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Language: English
Page range: 57 - 68
Published on: Mar 28, 2011
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2011 Ireneusz Czarnowski, Piotr Jędrzejowicz, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.