Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quality improvement of rule-based gene group descriptions using information about GO terms importance occurring in premises of determined rules Cover

Quality improvement of rule-based gene group descriptions using information about GO terms importance occurring in premises of determined rules

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
Volume 20 (2010): Issue 3 (September 2010)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Sep 2010
References

References

  1. Agrawal, R. and Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules,, pp. 487-499.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Agresti, A. (2002)., Wiley Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Al-Shahrour, F., Minguez, P., Vaquerizas, J., Conde, L. and Dopazo, J. (2005). Babelomics: A suite of web tools for functional annotation and analysis of groups of genes in high-throughput experiments,: W460-W464.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. An, A. and Cercone, N. (2001). Rule quality measures for rule induction systems: Description and evaluation,(3): 409-424.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Ashburner, M., Ball, C., Blake, J., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J., Davis, A., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S., Eppig, J., Harris, M., Hill, D. P., Issel-Tarver, L., Kasarskis, A., Lewis, S., Matese, J., Richardson, J., Ringwald, M., Rubin, G. and Sherlock, G. (2000). Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology,(1): 25-29.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Bairagi, R. and Suchindran, C. (1989). An estimator of the cutoff point maximizing sum of sensitivity and specificity,(B-2): 263-269.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Baldi, P. and Hatfield, G. (2002)., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Banzhaf, J. (1965). Weighted voting doesn't work: A mathematical analysis,(2): 317-343.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, T. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing,(1): 289-300.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Bruckmann, A., Hensbergen, P., Balog, C., Deelder, A., de Steensma, H. and van Heusden, G. (2007). Posttranscriptional control of the saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome by 14-3-3 proteins,(5): 1689-1699.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Brzezinska, I., Greco, S. and Slowinski, R. (2007). Mining pareto-optimal rules with respect to support and confirmation or support and anti-support,(5): 587-600.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Carmona-Saez, P., Chagoyen, M., Rodriguez, A., Trelles, O., Carazo, J. and Pascual-Montano, A. (2006). Integrated analysis of gene expression by association rules discovery,(1): 54.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Carmona-Saez, P., Chagoyen, M., Tirado, F., Carazo, J. and Pascual-Montano, A. (2007). Genecodis: A web-based tool for finding significant concurrent annotations in gene lists,(1): R3.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Eisen, M., Spellman, P., Brown, P. and Botstein, D. (1998). Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns,(25): 14863-14868.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. and Smyth, P. (1996). From data mining to knowledge discovery: An overview,U. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, P. Smyth and R. Uthurusamy (Eds.),, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 1-34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Fürnkranz, J. (1999). Separate-and-conquer rule learning,(1): 3-54.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Fürnkranz, J. and Flach, P. (2005). Roc'n' rule learning—Towards a better understanding of covering algorithms,(1): 39-77.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Greco, S., Pawlak, Z. and Słowiński, R. (2004). Can Bayesian confirmation measures be useful for rough set decision rules?,(4): 345-361.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Greco, S., Słowiński, R. and Stefanowski, J. (2007). Evaluating importance of conditions in the set of discovered rules,, pp. 314-321.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Gruca, A. and Sikora, M. (2009). Ontological description of gene groups by the multiattribute statistically significant logical rules,S. Safeeullah (Ed.),, INTECH, Vukovar, pp. 277-303.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Gruca, A., Sikora, M., Chróst, Ł. and Polański, A. (2009). Rulego. Bioinformatical internet service system architecture,, pp. 160-167.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Grzymała-Busse, J., Stefanowski, J. and Wilk, S. (2005). A comparison of two approaches to data mining from imbalanced data,(6): 565-573.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Grzymała-Busse, J. and Ziarko, W. (2003). Data mining based on rough sets,J. Wang (Ed.),, IGI Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp. 142-173.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Guillet, F. and Hamilton, H. (2007)., Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Hackenberg, M. and Matthiesen, R. (2008). Annotationmodules: A tool for finding significant combinations of multisource annotations for gene lists,(11): 1386-1393.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Hvidsten, T., Legreid, A. and Komorowski, H. (2003). Learning rule-based models of biological process from gene expression time profiles using gene ontology,(9): 1116-1123.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Iyer, V., Eisen, M., Ross, D., Schuler, G., Moore, T., Lee, J., Trent, J., Staudt, L., Hudson, J., Boguski, M., Lashkari, D., Shalon, D., Botstein, D. and Brown, P. (1999). The transcriptional program in the response of human fibroblasts to serum,(5398): 83-87.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Kano, M., Morishita, Y., Iwata, C., Iwasaka, S., Watabe, T., Ouchi, Y., Miyazono, K. and Miyazawa, K. (2005). Vegfa and fgf-2 synergistically promote neoangiogenesis through enhancement of endogenous pdgf-b-pdgfrbeta signaling,(Pt 16): 3759-3768.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Khatri, P. and Drăghici, S. (2005). Ontological analysis of gene expression data: Current tools, limitations, and open problems,(18): 3587-3595.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Maere, S., Heymans, K. and Kuiper, M. (2005). Bingo: A cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks,(16): 3448-3449.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Mata-Greenwood, E., Meyrick, B., Soifer, S., Fineman, J. and Black, S. (2003). Expression of vegf and its receptors flt-1 and flk-1/kdr is altered in lambs with increased pulmonary blood flow and pulmonary hypertension,(1): L222-L231.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Michalski, R., Bratko, I. and Kubar, M. (1998)., John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Midelfart, H. (2005a). Supervised learning in the gene ontology, Part I: A rough set framework,J. Peters and A. Skowron (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3700, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 69-97.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Midelfart, H. (2005b). Supervised learning in gene ontology, Part II: A bottom-up algorithm,J. Peters and A. Skowron (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3700, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 98-124.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Seghezzi, G., Patel, S., Ren, C., Gualandris, A., Pintucci, G., Robbins, E., Shapiro, R., Galloway, A., Rifkin, D. and Mignatti, P. (1998). Fibroblast growth factor-2 (fgf-2) induces vascular endothelial growth factor (vegf) expression in the endothelial cells of forming capillaries: an autocrine mechanism contributing to angiogenesis,(7): 1659-1673.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Sikora, M. (2006)., Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 4259, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 716-725.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Sikora, M. (2010). Decision rules-based data models using TRS and NetTRS—Methods and algorithms,J., Peters and A. Skowron (Eds.),, Lecture Notes on Computer Sciences, Vol. 5946, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 130-160.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Stefanowski, J. and Vanderpooten, D. (2001). Induction of decision rules in classification and discovery-oriented perspectives,(1): 13-27.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-010-0041-3 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 555 - 570
Published on: Sep 27, 2010
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
decision rules,
importance of rules premises,
measures of rules interestingness,
gene ontology,
descriptions of gene groups
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Applied mathematics

© 2010 Marek Sikora, Aleksandra Gruca, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 20 (2010): Issue 3 (September 2010)
Previous article
Next article