Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Automatic Risk Control Based on FSA Methodology Adaptation for Safety Assessment in Intelligent Buildings Cover

Automatic Risk Control Based on FSA Methodology Adaptation for Safety Assessment in Intelligent Buildings

Open Access
|Jul 2009

References

  1. Drągowski, A. (2004). Importance of enigineering geology studies in the environmental impact assessments, Przegląd Geologiczny 52(5): 138-140, (in Polish).
  2. Dwiliński, L. (2006). The Basics of Technical Structures Exploitation, Warsaw University of Technology Press, Warsaw, (in Polish)
  3. Hauryłkiewicz, J. (2005). Probabilistic evaluation of the environment conditions: Methodological issues, Przegląd Geologiczny 53(6): 516-521, (in Polish).
  4. Hu, S., Fang, Q., Xia, H. and Xi, Y. (2007). Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 92(3): 369-377.10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.011
  5. MEPC, M. E. P. C. (1997). Interim guidelines for the application of formal safety assessment (FSA) to the IMO rulemaking processes, Technical Report MEPC/Circ. 335, International Maritime Organization, London.
  6. MEPC, M. E. P. C. (2000). Report of the marine environment protection committee on its forty-fifth session, Technical Report MEPC 45/20, International Maritime Organization, London.
  7. Mikulik, J. (2008). Selected Problems of Ensuring Security and Comfort in Buildings, AGH University of Science and Technology Press, Cracow, (in Polish).
  8. Mikulik, J. and Boryczko, T. (2002). Intelligent building as an object integrating electronic systems, Elektronika 43(7/8): 28-31, (in Polish).
  9. Mikulik, J., Pawlik, M. and Blim, M. (2005). Intelligent Building. Part II: Basic Security and Safety Systems in Intelligent Buildings, Silesian University of Technology Press, Gliwice, (in Polish).
  10. Mikulik, J., Pawlik, M. and Blim, M. (2007). The Role and the Meaning of Technical Security Systems in Crisis States. Crisis, Accidents, Disasters in the Context of Threats' Growth, University of Silesia Press, Katowice, (in Polish).
  11. Mikulik, J. and Zajdel, M. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative models for risk assessment in exploitation of ecologically dangerous structures, VISNIK of the East Ukrainian National University Named in Memory of Vladimir Dal Scientific Journal 126(8): 298-303.
  12. Soares, C. G. and Teixeira, A. P. (2001). Risk assessment in maritime transportation, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 74(3): 299-309.10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00104-1
  13. Truemper, K. (2004). Design of Logic-based Intelligent Systems, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.10.1002/0471723940
  14. Wang, J. (2001). The current status and future aspects in formal ship safety assessment, Safety Science 38(3): 19-30.10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00052-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-009-0027-1 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Language: English
Page range: 317 - 326
Published on: Jul 8, 2009
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2009 Jerzy Mikulik, Mirosław Zajdel, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 19 (2009): Issue 2 (June 2009)