Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Robust Parameter Design Using the Weighted Metric Method—The Case of ‘the Smaller the Better’ Cover

Robust Parameter Design Using the Weighted Metric Method—The Case of ‘the Smaller the Better’

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
Volume 19 (2009): Issue 1 (March 2009)
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Apr 2009
References

References

  1. Asgharpour, M.J., (1998). Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Tehran University Press, Tehran.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Borkowski, J.J. and Lucas, J.M., (1997). Designs of mixed resolution for process robustness studies, Technometrics 39(1): 63-70.10.1080/00401706.1997.10485440
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Borror, C.M. and Montgomery, D.C., (2000). Mixed resolution designs as alternatives to Taguchi inner/outer array designs for robust design problems, Quality and Reliability Engineering International 16(2): 117-127.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1638(200003/04)16:2<;117::AID-QRE309>3.0.CO;2-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Box, G.E.P., Bisgaard S., and Fung C., (1988). An explanation and critique of Taguchi's contributions to quality engineering, Quality and Reliability Engineering International 4(2): 123-131.10.1002/qre.4680040207
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Box, G.E.P. and Jones, S., (1992). Split-plot designs for robust product experimentation, Journal of Applied Statistics 19(1): 3-26.10.1080/02664769200000001
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Copeland, K. and Nelson, P.R., (1996). Dual response optimization via direct function minimization, Journal of Quality Technology 28(3): 331-336.10.1080/00224065.1996.11979683
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Chankong, V. and Haimes, Y., (1983). Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology, North Holland, New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Deb, k., (2001). Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, Wiley, New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Del Castillo, E., Alvarez, M.J., Ilzarbe, L. and Viles, E., (2007). A new design criterion for robust parameter experiments, Journal of Quality Technology 39(3): 279-295.10.1080/00224065.2007.11917693
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Del Castillo, E. and Montgomery, D.C., (1993). A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem, Journal of Quality Technology 25(2): 199-204.10.1080/00224065.1993.11979454
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Drain, D., Borror, C.M., Anderson-Cook, C. M and Montgomery, D.C., (2005). Response surface design for correlated noise variables, Journal of Probability and Statistical Science 3(2): 247-281.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Draper, N.R. and Smith, H., (1998). Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Fan, S.K. and Del Castillo, E., (1999). Calculation of an optimal region of operation for dual response systems fitted from experimental data, Journal of the Operational Research Society 50(8): 826-836.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600777
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Fathi, Y., (1991). A nonlinear programming approach to the parameter design problem, European Journal of Operational Research 53(3): 371-381.10.1016/0377-2217(91)90070-C
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Hwang, C.L. and Masud, A.S. Md., (1979). Multiple Objective Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-45511-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Jeong, I. and Kim, K., (2005). D-STEM: A modified step method with desirability function concept, Computers and Operations Research 32(12): 3175-3190.10.1016/j.cor.2004.05.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Khattree, P., (1996). Robust parameter design: A response surface approach, Journal of Quality Technology 28(2): 187-198.10.1080/00224065.1996.11979659
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Khuri A.I., (1996). Response surface models with mixed effects, Journal of Quality Technology 28(2): 177-186.10.1080/00224065.1996.11979658
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Kim, Y.J., and Cho, B.R., (2002). Development of priority-based robust design, Quality Engineering 14(3): 355-363.10.1081/QEN-120001874
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Kim, K. and Lin, D.K.J., (1998). Dual response surface optimization: A fuzzy modeling approach, Journal of Quality Technology 30(1): 1-10.10.1080/00224065.1998.11979814
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Koksoy, O. and Doganaksoy, N., (2003). Joint optimization of mean and standard deviation using response surface methods, Journal of Quality Technology 35(3): 239-252.10.1080/00224065.2003.11980218
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Kunert, J., Auer, C., Erdbrugge, M. and Ewers, R., (2007). An experiment to compare Taguchi's product array and the combined array, Journal of Quality Technology 39(1): 17-34.10.1080/00224065.2007.11917670
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Lin, D. and Tu, W., (1995). Dual response surface optimization, Journal of Quality Technology 27(1): 34-39.10.1080/00224065.1995.11979556
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Lucas, J.M., (1994). How to achieve a robust process using response surface methodology, Journal of Quality Technology 25(3): 248-260.10.1080/00224065.1994.11979537
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Montgomery, D.C., (1990). Using fractional factorial designs for robust process development, Quality Engineering 3(2): 193-205.10.1080/08982119008918849
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Montgomery, D.C., (1999). Experimental design for product and process design and development, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society D 48(2): 159-177.10.1111/1467-9884.00179
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Myers, R.H., Kim, Y. and Griffiths, K.L., (1997). Response surface methods and the use of noise variables, Journal of Quality Technology 29(4): 429-440.10.1080/00224065.1997.11979794
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Myers, R.H., Khuri, A.I. and Vining, G.G., (1992). Response surface alternatives to the Taguchi robust parameter design approach, The American Statistician 46(2): 131-139.10.1080/00031305.1992.10475869
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C., Vining, G.G., Kowalski, S.M. and Borror, C.M. (2004). Response surface methodology: A retrospective and current literature review, Journal of Quality Technology 36(1): 53-77.10.1080/00224065.2004.11980252
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Myers, R.H. and Montgomery, D.C. (2002). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York, NY.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Nair, V.N., (1992). Taguchi's parameter design: A panel discussion, Technometrics 34(2): 127-161.10.1080/00401706.1992.10484904
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R., (1965). A simplex method for function minimization, Computer Journal 7(4): 308-313.10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Pignatiello, J.J. Jr. and Ramberg, J.S., (1991). The topten triumphs and tragedies of Genichi Taguchi, Quality Engineering 4(2): 211-225.10.1080/08982119108918907
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Pledger, M., (1996). Observable uncontrollable factors in parameter design, Journal of Quality Technology 28(2): 153-162.10.1080/00224065.1996.11979656
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Romano, D., Varetto, M. and Vicario, G., (2004). Multiresponse robust design: A general framework based on combined array, Journal of Quality Technology 36(1): 27-37.10.1080/00224065.2004.11980250
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Shoemaker, A.C., Tsui, K.L. and Wu, C.F.J., (1991). Economical experimentation methods for robust parameter design, Technometrics 33(4): 415-427.10.1080/00401706.1991.10484870
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Taguchi, G., (1987), System of Experimental Design: Engineering Methods to Optimize Quality and Minimize Cost, Quality Resources, White Plains, NJ.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Tang, L.C. and Xu, K., (2002). A unified approach for dual response optimization, Journal of Quality Technology 34(4): 437-447.10.1080/00224065.2002.11980175
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Vining, G.G. and Myers, R.H., (1990). Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach, Journal of Quality Technology 22(1): 38-45.10.1080/00224065.1990.11979204
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Welch, W.J., Yu, T.K., Kang, S.M. and Sacks, J., (1990). Computer experiments for quality control by parameter design, Journal of Quality Technology 22(1): 15-22.10.1080/00224065.1990.11979201
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-009-0005-7 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 68
Published on: Apr 2, 2009
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
multiobjective decision making,
regression estimation,
response surface methodology,
robust parameter design,
weighted metric method
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Applied mathematics

© 2009 Mostafa Ardakani, Rassoul Noorossana, Seyed Akhavan Niaki, Homayoun Lahijanian, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 19 (2009): Issue 1 (March 2009)