References
- Amundsen, F.H. (1994) Studies of driver behaviour in Norwegian road tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 9(1), 9–15.
- Amundsen, F.H. & Engebretsen, A. (2009) Studies on Norwegian road tunnels II. An analysis on traffic accidents in road tunnels 2001–2006.
- Amundsen, F.H. & Ranes, G. (2000) Studies on traffic accidents in Norwegian road tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 15(1), 3–11.
- Borovinšek, M., Vesenjak, M., Ulbin, M., Ren, Z. (2007) Simulation of crash tests for high containment levels of road safety barriers. Engineering Failure Analysis, 14(8), 1711–1718.
- Brian, A., John, Coon, Reid, D. (2006) Reconstruction techniques for energy-absorbing guardrail end terminals. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1–13.
- Bruski, D., Burzyński, S., Chróścielewski, J., Jamroz, K., Pachocki, Ł., Witkowski, W., Wilde, K. (2019) Experimental and numerical analysis of the modified TB32 crash tests of the cable barrier system. Engineering Failure Analysis, 104, 227–246.
- Caliendo C., Russo, I, Genovese, G. (2024) A Resilience Analysis of a Motorway Tunnel Affected by a Traffic Accident Using the Average Vehicles’ Speed as a Metric. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 22, 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00903-8.
- Chell, J., Brandani, C.E., Fraschetti, S., Chakraverty, J., Camomilla, V. (2019) Limitations of the European barrier crash testing regulation relating to occupant safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 133. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.015.
- Dinnella, N. (2019) Road safety barrier. Patent (PCT), n. IB2019/058588.
- Dinnella, N., Chiappone, S., Guerrieri, M. (2020) The innovative “NDBA” concrete safety barrier able to withstand two subsequent TB81 crash tests. Engineering Failure Analysis, 115, 104660.
- European Commission. (2004) Directive 2004/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Minimum Safety Requirements for Tunnels in the Trans-European Road Network 2004. Brussels
- EUPAVE. (2012) Concrete Safety Barriers: A Safe and Sustainable Choice. European Concrete Paving Association (EUPAVE), Brussels.
- Guerrieri, M. (2021) Smart Roads Geometric Design Criteria and Capacity Estimation Based on AV and CAV Emerging Technologies. A Case Study in the Trans-European Transport Network. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, 19(2), 429–440.
- Guerrieri, M., Parla, G., Corriere, F. (2013) A new methodology to estimate deformation of longitudinal safety barriers. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 8(9), 763–769.
- Guerrieri, M., Maini Lo Casto, B., Peri, G., Rizzo, G. (2020) Smart vs conventional motorways: Environmental impact assessment under realistic traffic conditions. Science of the Total Environment, 727, 138521.
- Grzebieta, R.H., Zou, R., Jiang, T., Carey, A. (2005) Roadside hazard and barrier crashworthiness issues confronting vehicle and barrier manufactures and government regulators. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington.
- Hallquist, J. (2006) LS-DYNA, Theory Manual.
- Li, Z., Fang, H., Fatoki, J., Gutowski, M., Wang, Q. (2021) A numerical study of strong-post double-faced W-beam and Thrie-beam guardrails under impacts of vehicles of multiple size classes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 159.
- Luo, Q., Liu, C. (2023) Exploration of road closure time characteristics of tunnel traffic accidents: A case study in Pennsylvania, USA. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 132.
- EN 1317-1:2010. (2010) Road restraint systems – part 1: Terminology and general criteria for test methods.
- EN 1317-2:2010. (2010) Road restraint systems – part 2: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for safety barriers including vehicle parapets.
- D.M. (2004) n. 2367, Italian Road safety barriers guidelines, 21/06/2004.
- Montella, A. (2001) Selection of roadside safety barrier containment level according to European Union Standards. Transportation Research Record, 1743, 104–110.
- NCHRP Report 492. (2003) Roadside Safety Analysis Program: Engineer’s Manual, TRB, Washington, D.C.
- Pireddu, A., Lombardi, M., Bruzzone, S., Berardi, D. (2022) Risk-based tunnel design for consequences of road accidents: the role of tunnel length. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 214, 71–81.
- Ren, R., Zhou, H., Hu, Z., He, S., Wang, X. (2019) Statistical analysis of fire accidents in Chinese highway tunnels 2000–2016. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 83, 452–460.
- Tischer, M. Wehrle, E.J, Baier, H. (2014) Reduced modeling of crash barriers for design, LS-DYNA Forum, Bamberg.
- Trajkovski, J., Ambrož, M., Kunc, R. (2018) The importance of friction coefficient between vehicle tyres and concrete safety barrier to vehicle rollover - FE analysis study. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 64(12), 753–762.
- Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. (2003) Interactive Highway Safety Design Midel: Getting Started Guide. Federal Highway Adiministration: Washington, DC, USA.
- Wang, Q., Jiang, S., Liu, H., Ma, F. (2019) Analysis on traffic accident characteristics of urban road tunnels. Chin. J. Underground Space Eng., 15 (Supplement 1), 460–469.
- Xing, R., Li, Z., Cai, X., Yang, Z., Zhang, N., Yang, T. (2023) Accident Rate Prediction Model for Urban Expressway Underwater Tunnel. Sustainability, 15, 10730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310730.
- Yang, J., Xu, G., Cai, C.S., Kareem, A. (2019) Crash performance evaluation of a new movable median guardrail on Highways. Engineering Structures, 182, 459–472.