Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Microscopic Analysis of the Relationship Between Prior Knowledge About Self-Driving Cars and the Public Acceptance: A Survey in the US Cover

A Microscopic Analysis of the Relationship Between Prior Knowledge About Self-Driving Cars and the Public Acceptance: A Survey in the US

Transport and Telecommunication Journal
Volume 24 (2023): Issue 2 (April 2023)
By: Kareem Othman  
Open Access
|Apr 2023

References

  1. Othman, K. (2022a) Exploring the implications of autonomous vehicles: A comprehensive review. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 7(2), 165.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Othman, K. (2022b) Multidimension analysis of autonomous vehicles: the future of mobility. Civil Engineering Journal, 7, 71-93.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Abdelgawad, H. and Othman, K. (2020) Multifaceted synthesis of autonomous vehicles’ emerging landscape. In: Connected and autonomous vehicles in smart cities, 67-113. CRC Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Kopelias, P., Demiridi, E., Vogiatzis, K., Skabardonis, A. and Zafiropoulou, V. (2020) Connected & autonomous vehicles–Environmental impacts–A review. Science of the total environment, 712, 135237.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Spence, J.C., Kim, Y.B., Lamboglia, C.G., Lindeman, C., Mangan, A.J., McCurdy, A.P., Stearns, J.A., Wohlers, B., Sivak, A. and Clark, M.I. (2020) Potential impact of autonomous vehicles on movement behavior: a scoping review. American journal of preventive medicine, 58(6), e191-e199.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E. and Antoniou, C. (2020) Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 111, 255-293.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Othman, K. (2022) Cities in the Era of Autonomous Vehicles: A Comparison Between Conventional Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles. In: Resilient and Responsible Smart Cities, 95-108. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Othman, K. (2021a) Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review. AI and Ethics, 1(3), 355-387.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Othman, K. (2023) Public attitude towards autonomous vehicles before and after crashes: A detailed analysis based on the demographic characteristics. Cogent Engineering, 10(1), 2156063.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Othman, K. (2021b). Impact of autonomous vehicles on the physical infrastructure: Changes and challenges. Designs, 5(3), p.40.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Berliner, R.M., Hardman, S. and Tal, G. (2019) Uncovering early adopter’s perceptions and purchase intentions of automated vehicles: Insights from early adopters of electric vehicles in California. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 60, 712-722.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1997) The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision sciences, 28(3), 557-582.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Brockman, B.K. and Morgan, R.M. (1999) The evolution of managerial innovations in distribution: what prospects for ECR? International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(10), 397-408.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Freeman, C. (1995) The ‘National System of Innovation’in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1), 5-24.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Hardman, S., Steinberger-Wilckens, R. and Van Der Horst, D. (2013) Disruptive innovations: the case for hydrogen fuel cells and battery electric vehicles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(35), 15438-15451.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Hsu, C.L., Lu, H.P. and Hsu, H.H. (2007) Adoption of the mobile Internet: An empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS). Omega, 35(6), 715-726.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Johnson, V.L., Kiser, A., Washington, R. and Torres, R. (2018) Limitations to the rapid adoption of M-payment services: Understanding the impact of privacy risk on M-Payment services. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 111-122.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Van Slyke, C., Ilie, V., Lou, H. and Stafford, T. (2007) Perceived critical mass and the adoption of a communication technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 270-283.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Davis, N. (2018) New laser technology lets driverless cars see round corners. Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/05/selfdriving-cars-may-soon-be-able-tosee-around-corners.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Halsey, A. (2017) Driverless cars promise far greater mobility for the elderly and people with disabilities. Wash. Post Retrieved from. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/driverless-cars-promise-far-greater-mobility-for-theelderly-and-people-with-disabilities/2017/11/23/6994469c-c4a3-11e7-84bc-5e285c7f4512_story.html?utm_term=.b5549509a7a4.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Wakabayashi, D. (2018) Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona pedestrian, where robots roam. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/uber-driverless-fatality.html
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Geer, J.G. and Kahn, K.F. (1993) Grabbing attention: An experimental investigation of headlines during campaigns. Political Communication, 10(2), 175-191.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Gerber, A.S., Karlan, D. and Bergan, D. (2009) Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(2), 35-52.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Kull, S., Ramsay, C. and Lewis, E. (2003) Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq war. Political science quarterly, 118(4), 569-598.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Siegrist, M. and Cvetkovich, G. (2000) Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk analysis, 20(5), 713-720.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Siegrist, M. (2000) The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk analysis, 20(2), 195-204.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Ward, C., Raue, M., Lee, C., D’Ambrosio, L. and Coughlin, J.F. (2017) Acceptance of automated driving across generations: The role of risk and benefit perception, knowledge, and trust. In: Human-Computer Interaction. User Interface Design, Development and Multimodality: 19th International Conference, HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9-14, 2017, Proceedings, Part I 19, 254-266. Springer International Publishing.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Poczter, S.L. and Jankovic, L.M. (2014) The google car: driving toward a better future? Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS), 10(1), 7-14.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Stewart, L., Musa, M., Croce, N. (2019) Look no hands: self-driving vehicles' public trust problem. World economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/08/self-driving-vehicles-public-trust/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. American Automobile Association (AAA) (2018) Fact Sheet Vehicle Technology Survey—Phase IIIB. Retrieved online via https://publicaffairsresources.aaa.biz/download/10980/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Lienert, P. (2018) Most Americans wary of self-driving cars: Reuters/Ipsos poll. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autos-selfdriving-usa-poll/most-americans-wary-of-selfdriving-cars-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN1FI034
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Nordhoff, S., Kyriakidis, M., Van Arem, B. and Happee, R. (2019) A multi-level model on automated vehicle acceptance (MAVA): A review-based study. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science, 20(6), 682-710.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Janatabadi, F. and Ermagun, A. (2022) Empirical evidence of bias in public acceptance of autonomous vehicles. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 84, 330-347.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Liu, P., Guo, Q., Ren, F., Wang, L. and Xu, Z. (2019) Willingness to pay for self-driving vehicles: Influences of demographic and psychological factors. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 100, 306-317.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Ho, S.S., Leow, V.J.X. and Leung, Y.W. (2020) Driving without the brain? Effects of value predispositions, media attention, and science knowledge on public willingness to use driverless cars in Singapore. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 71, 49-61.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Nordhoff, S., Louw, T., Innamaa, S., Lehtonen, E., Beuster, A., Torrao, G., Bjorvatn, A., Kessel, T., Malin, F., Happee, R. and Merat, N. (2020) Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A questionnaire study among 9,118 car drivers from eight European countries. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 74, 280-297.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Golbabaei, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Paz, A. and Bunker, J. (2020) Individual predictors of autonomous vehicle public acceptance and intention to use: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 106.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. König, M. and Neumayr, L. (2017) Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 44, 42-52.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Charness, N., Yoon, J.S., Souders, D., Stothart, C. and Yehnert, C. (2018) Predictors of attitudes toward autonomous vehicles: The roles of age, gender, prior knowledge, and personality. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2589.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Jing, P., Huang, H., Ran, B., Zhan, F. and Shi, Y. (2019) Exploring the factors affecting mode choice Intention of autonomous vehicle based on an extended theory of planned behavior—A case study in China. Sustainability, 11(4), 1155.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Stilgoe, J. and Cohen, T. (2021) Rejecting acceptance: learning from public dialogue on self-driving vehicles. Science and Public Policy, 48(6), 849-859.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. DMV. (2022) Autonomous Vehicle Collision Reports. https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/autonomous-vehicles/autonomous-vehicle-collision-reports/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. United States Census Bureau. (2022) Growth in U.S. Population Shows Early Indication of Recovery Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/2022-population-estimates.html
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2023-0012 | Journal eISSN: 1407-6179 | Journal ISSN: 1407-6160
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 128 - 142
Published on: Apr 15, 2023
Published by: Transport and Telecommunication Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
self-driving cars,
public acceptance,
prior knowledge,
hypothesis testing
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2023 Kareem Othman, published by Transport and Telecommunication Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2023): Issue 2 (April 2023)Next article