References
- 1. Abadie, L. M., Goicoechea, N. and Galarraga, I. (2017) Adapting the shipping sector to stricter emissions regulations: Fuel switching or installing a scrubber? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 57, pp.237-250.
- 2. Acciaro, M. (2014). Real options analysis for environmental compliance: LNG and emission control areas. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, pp.41-50.10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.007
- 3. Angelidis, T. and Skiadopoulos, G. (2008) Measuring the market risk of freight rates: A value-at-risk approach. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 11(05), pp.447-469. 4.
- 4. Atari, S. and Prause, G. (2018) Risk assessment of emission abatement technologies for clean shipping. In: Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I., Prentkovskis, O. (Ed.). Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication.17th International Multi-Conference “Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication” (RelSTat2017) Riga. October 18-21, 2017. Berlin: Springer. (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems.
- 5. Baker, H.K. and Haslem, J.A. (1974) The impact of investor socioeconomic characteristics on risk and return preferences. Journal of Business Research, 2(4), pp. 469-476.10.1016/0148-2963(74)90032-0
- 6. Bas, G., De Boo, K., Vaes-Van de Hulsbeek, A. M. and Nikolic, I. (2017) MarPEM: An agent based model to explore the effects of policy instruments on the transition of the maritime fuel system away from HFO. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 55, 162-174.
- 7. Basak, S. and Shapiro, A. (2001) Value-at-risk-based risk management: optimal policies and asset prices. The review of financial studies, 14(2), pp.371-405.
- 8. Bergqvist, R., Turesson, M. and Weddmark, A. (2015) Sulphur emission control areas and transport strategies-the case of Sweden and the forest industry. European Transport Research Review, 7(2), pp.10.
- 9. Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S. and Vine, E. (2006) Energy service companies in European countries: Current status and a strategy to foster their development. Energy Policy, 34(14), pp.1818-1832.
- 10. Bleyl, J. W. (2011). Conservation first! The new integrated energy-contracting model to combine energy efficiency and renewable supply in large buildings and industry. ECEEE summer Studies, Paper ID, 485.
- 11. Boons, F. and Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013) Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, pp.9-19.
- 12. CE Delft (2017) Assessment of Fuel Oil Availability. Final report Delft, July 2016 www.cedelft.eu/publicatie/assessment_of_fuel_oil_availability/1858. Access 05/10/2017
- 13. Chesbrough, H. (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long range planning, 43(2), pp.354-363.10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010
- 14. Daduna, J.R. and Prause, G. (2017) The Baltic Sea as a Maritime Highway in International Multimodal Transport. In Operations Research Proceedings 2015, Springer, pp.189-194.
- 15. Dowd, K. (2007) Measuring market risk. John Wiley & Sons.
- 16. EMSA (2010) European Maritime safety Agency Annual 2010 Report. Retrieved May 10, 2016 from www.emsa.europa.eu/emsa-documents/download/1421/143/23.html.
- 17. Goldman, C.A., Hopper, N.C. and Osborn, J.G. (2005) Review of US ESCO industry market trends: an empirical analysis of project data. Energy policy, 33(3), pp.387-405.10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.008
- 18. Gu, Y. and Wallace, S. W. (2017) Scrubber: A potentially overestimated compliance method for the Emission Control Areas: The importance of involving a ship’s sailing pattern in the evaluation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 55, pp.51-66.10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.024
- 19. Hämäläinen, E., Hilmola, O.P., Prause, G. and Tolli, A. (2016) Forecasting maritime logistics costs – Will the low oil price remain? In A. Serry and L. Lévêque (Eds.). Le transport maritime à courte distance (Short-Sea Shipping), Devport 2016 Conference, pp. 19-34. Le Havre, France: EMS Geodif.
- 20. Hendricks, D. (1997). Evaluation of value-at-risk models using historical data. Economic Policy Review, 2(1).
- 21. Herbst, A.F. (2003) Capital asset investment: strategy, tactics and tools. John Wiley & Sons.
- 22. Horbach, J., Rammer, C. and Rennings, K. (2012) Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological economics, 78, pp.112-122.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
- 23. IMO (2015) Guidance on the application of regulation 13 of MARPOL annex VI Tier III requirements to dual fuel and gas-fuelled engines. MEPC.1/Circ.854. London. http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/MEPC-70-2020sulphur.aspx. Accessed 2016/11/30.
- 24. IMO (2016) IMO sets 2020 date for ships to comply with low sulphur fuel oil requirement. Press briefing release 28/10/2016. http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/MEPC-70-2020sulphur.aspx Accessed 30/11/2016.
- 25. Jiang, L., Kronbak, J. and Christensen, L.P. (2014) The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, pp.19-27.10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.005
- 26. Jorion, P. (2006) Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill.
- 27. Kvale, S. (2008) Doing interviews. Book 2 of The SAGE qualitative research kit.
- 28. Lindstad, H. E. and Eskeland, G. S. (2016) Environmental regulations in shipping: Policies leaning towards globalization of scrubbers deserve scrutiny. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 47, pp. 67-76.10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.004
- 29. Lindstad, H., Sandaas, I. and Strømman, A. H. (2015) Assessment of cost as a function of abatement options in maritime emission control areas. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 38, pp.41-48.
- 30. Linsmeier, T. J. and Pearson, N. D. (2000) Value at risk. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(2), pp.47-67.10.2469/faj.v56.n2.2343
- 31. McGrath, R.G. (2010) Business models: A discovery driven approach. Long range planning, 43(2), pp.247-261.10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.005
- 32. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldana, J. (1984) Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills.
- 33. North (2016) China: Emission Control Areas. Retrieved from http://www.nepia.com/news/industry-news/china-emission-control-areas-starupdatestar/. Accessed 22.12.2016.
- 34. Notteboom, T. (2010) The impact of low sulphur fuel requirements in shipping on the competitiveness of roro shipping in Northern Europe. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 10(1), pp.63–95.
- 35. Nugraha, F. (2009) Effective implementation of emission control area towards cleaner shipping operations: focusing on sulphur oxides (SOx) emission reduction (2009).World Maritime University Dissertations. 186.
- 36. OECD/ITF (2016) Reducing Sulphur Emissions from Ships: The Impact of International Regulation.http://www.itf-oecd.org/reducing-sulphur-emissions-ships-impact-international-regulation. Accessed 10/06/2016.
- 37. Olaniyi, E., Gerber, P. and Prause (2018) Strategic Energy Partnership in Shipping. Risk assessment of emission abatement technologies for clean shipping. In: Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I., Prentkovskis, O. (Ed.). Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication.17th International Multi-Conference “Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication” (RelSTat2017) Riga. October 18-21, 2017. Berlin: Springer.
- 38. Olaniyi, E., Prause, G. and Boyesen, J. (2018) The impact of SECA regulations on clean shipping in the BSR: First empiric results from EnviSuM project. In: Ölçer, A.I., Kitada, M., Dalaklis, D., Ballini, F. (Ed.). Trends and Challenges in Maritime Energy Management. 2017 International Conference on Maritime Energy Management, Malmo, Sweden, 24-25 January 2017. Springer. (WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs.
- 39. Olaniyi, E. O. (2017) Towards EU 2020: An Outlook of SECA Regulations Implementation in the BSR. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 7(2), pp.182-207.
- 40. Olaniyi, E.O. and Viirmäe, M. (2016) The Economic Impact of Environmental Regulations on a Maritime Fuel Production Company. Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, 8(2) pp.58-84.
- 41. Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2009) Business Model Creation. Modderman Drukwerk: Amsterdam.
- 42. Panagakos, G.P., Stamatopoulou, E.V. and Psaraftis, H.N. (2014) The possible designation of the Mediterranean Sea as a SECA: A case study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, pp.74-90.10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.010
- 43. Patricksson, Ø. and Erikstad, S.O. (2017) A two-stage optimization approach for sulphur emission regulation compliance. Maritime Policy & Management, 44(1), pp.94-111.
- 44. Platts (2016) The IMO’s 2020 Global Sulfur Cap: What A 2020 Sulfur-Constrained World Means for Shipping Lines, Refineries and Bunker Suppliers. https://www.platts.com/IM.Platts.../SR-IMO-2020-Global-sulfur-cap-102016.pdf. Accessed 12/12/2016
- 45. Plouffe, S., Lanoie, P., Berneman, C. and Vernier, M. F. (2011) Economic benefits tied to eco-design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(6), pp. 573-579.10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.003
- 46. Prause, G. and Olaniyi E.O. (2017) The impact of environmental regulations on the regional development in Eastern Estonia. New Challenges of Economic and Business Development - 2017: Riga, May 18th – 20th, 2017. Ed. Muravska, T. Riga: Latvian State University
- 47. Ren, J. and Lützen, M. (2015) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for technology selection for emissions reduction from shipping under uncertainties. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 40, pp. 43-60.
- 48. Ross, S.A., Westerfield, R., Jaffe, J.F. and Roberts, G.S. (2002) Corporate finance (Vol. 7). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
- 49. Schinas, O. and Stefanakos, C. N. (2012) Cost assessment of environmental regulation and options for marine operators. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 25, pp.81-99.
- 50. Siggelkow, N. (2007) Persuasion with case studies. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), pp.20-24.10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160882
- 51. Sorrell, S. (2007) The economics of energy service contracts. Energy Policy, 35(1), pp.507-521.10.1016/j.enpol.2005.12.009
- 52. Stopford M. (2009) Maritime economics, Routledge 2nd Edition, London and New York.
- 53. Sys, C., Vanelslander, T., Adriaenssens, M. and Van Rillaer, I. (2016) International emission regulation in sea transport: Economic feasibility and impact. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 45, pp.139-151.
- 54. TE (2017a) Consumer Price Index/Estonia. https://tradingeconomics.com/estonia/consumer-price-index-cpi accessed 1.11.2017.
- 55. TE (2017b) Labour costs/Estonia.https://tradingeconomics.com/estonia/labour-costs. Accessed 1.11.2017.
- 56. Wiśnicki, B., Czermański, E., Droździecki, S., Matczak, M. and Spangenberg, E. (2014) Sulphur Regulation–technology solutions and economic consequences for the Baltic Sea Region shipping market. In: Ernest Czermański (ed) Institute of Maritime Transport and Seaborne Trade, University of Gdańsk.
- 57. WoodMackenze (2016) Global marine fuel sulphur cap - challenges of a 2020 implementation. https://www.woodmac.com/reports/refining-and-oil-products-global-marine-fuel-sulphur-cap-challenges-of-a-2020-implementation-43374172. Accessed on 30.11.2016.