Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quality of Bus Services Performance: Benefits of Real Time Passenger Information Systems Cover

Quality of Bus Services Performance: Benefits of Real Time Passenger Information Systems

Transport and Telecommunication Journal
Volume 14 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Apr 2013
References

References

  1. 1. Banister, D., Stead, D., Steen, P., Akerman, J., Dreborg, K. & Nijkamp, P. (2000).London: Spon Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Bristow, A., Pearman, A., & Shires, J. (1997). An assessment of advanced transport telematics evaluation procedures., 17(3), 177-205.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Cascajo, R. (2004). Socio-environmental benefits of rail urban projects: A European benchmarking. In Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, 2004, 4-6 October. Strasbourg: ETC.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Daskalakis, N., & Stathopoulos, A. (2008). Users’ perceptive evaluation of bus arrival time deviations in stochastic networks., 11(4), 25-38.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Delle Site, P., Filippi, F. (2009). Weighting methods in multi-attribute assessment of transport projects., 1, 199-206.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. EBSF. (2012). Evaluation report of use cases. (Deliverable 4.2.3 Ed.)
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. EBSF. (2008-2012).European Commission. Retrieved 25th September, 2012, from http://www.ebsf.eu/index.php/objectives
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Hounsell, N. B., Shrestha, B. P., Piao, J. & McDonald, M. (2009). Review of urban traffic management and the impacts of new vehicle technologies., 3(4), 419-428.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Lappin, J. (2000). What have we learned about advanced traveler information systems and customer satisfaction? Chapter 4. In? (pp. 66-85). Washington D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, U.S Department of Transportation.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Monzon, A., & de la Hoz, D. (2009). Efectos sobre la movilidad de la dinámica territorial de Madrid., 14, 58-71.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Monzón, A., Pardeiro, A., & Vega, L. (2007). Reducing car trip and pollutant emissions through strategic transport planning in Madrid, Spain., 12(1), 81-90.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Politis, I., Papaioannou, P., Basbas, S. & Dimitriadis, N. (2010). Evaluation of a bus passenger information system from the users’ point of view in the city of Thessaloniki, Greece., 29 (1), 249-255.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Tang, L., & Thakuriah, P. (2012). Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: A case study in the city of Chicago., 22(0), 146-161.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Tyrinopoulos, Y. & Antoniou, C. (2008). Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications., 15(4), 260-272.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2013-0013 | Journal eISSN: 1407-6179 | Journal ISSN: 1407-6160
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 155 - 166
Published on: Apr 25, 2013
Published by: Transport and Telecommunication Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Real Time Information,
bus reliability,
perceived quality of service
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2013 Andres Monzon, Sara Hernandez, Rocio Cascajo, published by Transport and Telecommunication Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 14 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)
Previous article
Next article