Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quality of Bus Services Performance: Benefits of Real Time Passenger Information Systems Cover

Quality of Bus Services Performance: Benefits of Real Time Passenger Information Systems

Open Access
|Apr 2013

References

  1. 1. Banister, D., Stead, D., Steen, P., Akerman, J., Dreborg, K. & Nijkamp, P. (2000). European transportpolicy and sustainable mobility. London: Spon Press.
  2. 2. Bristow, A., Pearman, A., & Shires, J. (1997). An assessment of advanced transport telematics evaluation procedures. Transport Reviews, 17(3), 177-205.10.1080/01441649708716981
  3. 3. Cascajo, R. (2004). Socio-environmental benefits of rail urban projects: A European benchmarking. In Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, 2004, 4-6 October. Strasbourg: ETC.
  4. 4. Daskalakis, N., & Stathopoulos, A. (2008). Users’ perceptive evaluation of bus arrival time deviations in stochastic networks. Journal of Public Transportation, 11(4), 25-38.10.5038/2375-0901.11.4.2
  5. 5. Delle Site, P., Filippi, F. (2009). Weighting methods in multi-attribute assessment of transport projects. European Transport Research Review, 1, 199-206.10.1007/s12544-009-0018-1
  6. 6. EBSF. (2012). Evaluation report of use cases. (Deliverable 4.2.3 Ed.)
  7. 7. EBSF. (2008-2012). European Bus System of the Future. VII Framework Programme. European Commission. Retrieved 25th September, 2012, from http://www.ebsf.eu/index.php/objectives
  8. 8. Hounsell, N. B., Shrestha, B. P., Piao, J. & McDonald, M. (2009). Review of urban traffic management and the impacts of new vehicle technologies. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 3(4), 419-428.10.1049/iet-its.2009.0046
  9. 9. Lappin, J. (2000). What have we learned about advanced traveler information systems and customer satisfaction? Chapter 4. In What have we learned about ITS? (pp. 66-85). Washington D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, U.S Department of Transportation.
  10. 10. Monzon, A., & de la Hoz, D. (2009). Efectos sobre la movilidad de la dinámica territorial de Madrid. Urban, 14, 58-71.
  11. 11. Monzón, A., Pardeiro, A., & Vega, L. (2007). Reducing car trip and pollutant emissions through strategic transport planning in Madrid, Spain. Highway and Urban Environment, 12(1), 81-90.10.1007/978-1-4020-6010-6_9
  12. 12. Politis, I., Papaioannou, P., Basbas, S. & Dimitriadis, N. (2010). Evaluation of a bus passenger information system from the users’ point of view in the city of Thessaloniki, Greece. Research inTransportation Economics, 29 (1), 249-255.10.1016/j.retrec.2010.07.031
  13. 13. Tang, L., & Thakuriah, P. (2012). Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: A case study in the city of Chicago. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 22(0), 146-161.10.1016/j.trc.2012.01.001
  14. 14. Tyrinopoulos, Y. & Antoniou, C. (2008). Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications. Transport Policy, 15(4), 260-272.10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2013-0013 | Journal eISSN: 1407-6179 | Journal ISSN: 1407-6160
Language: English
Page range: 155 - 166
Published on: Apr 25, 2013
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2013 Andres Monzon, Sara Hernandez, Rocio Cascajo, published by Transport and Telecommunication Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.