Distribution of Common Chub, Common Dace and Roach Across Environmental Gradients on the East Edge of Europe

Askeyev, Arthur; Askeyev, Oleg; Askeyev, Igor; Monakhov, Sergey; Yanybaev, Nur

doi:10.2478/trser-2025-0004

Abstract

The probability of occurrence, optimums, niche breadth, and distribution of three fish species in 559 small rivers on the eastern edge of Europe were studied. Roach was the most abundant species, while common chub was the most frequent by occurrence. The probability of occurrence of common chub, common dace, and roach differs significantly between our studies in the extreme east of Europe and those in river basins in the west of the continent. Cohabitation of all three species was noted in 13.1% of rivers. The highest percentage (22.9%) of cohabited fish was observed for chub and dace. Elevation and river depth were the main environmental factors influencing the distribution of all the selected fish species. Our research on the eastern edge of Europe shows that fish niche widths can vary significantly between species for some environmental factors, while being similar for others.

References

Allan J. D., Abell R., Hogan Z. E., Revenga C., Taylor B. W., Welcomme R. L. and Winemiller K., 2005 – Overfishing of inland waters, BioScience, 55, 12, 1041-1051.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Askeyev O., Askeyev I., Askeyev A., Monakhov S. and Yanybaev N., 2015 – River fish assemblages in relation to environmental factors in the eastern extremity of Europe (Tatarstan Republic, Russia), Environmental Biology of Fishes, 98, 1277-1293.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Askeyev A., Askeyev O., Yanybaev N., Askeyev I., Monakhov S., Marić S. and Hulsman K., 2017 – River fish assemblages along an elevation gradient in the eastern extremity of Europe, Environmental Biology of Fishes, 100, 585-596.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Askeyev A., Askeyev O., Askeyev I., and Monakhov S., 2021 – Predatory fish species as indicators of biodiversity: their distribution in environmental gradients in small and mid-sized rivers in Eastern Europe, Environmental Biology of Fishes, 104, 767-778.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Askeyev A., Askeyev O., Askeyev I., Monakhov S. and Sparks T. H., 2022 – Habitat preferences of small fish species in rivers at the eastern edge of Europe, Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 24, 2, 61-72.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Askeyev I. V., Tarasov A. Y., Askeyev A. O., Askeyev O. V., Shaymuratova D. N. and Monakhov S. P., 2023a – Highly productive fishing in Lake Onega? New data on the subsistence basis of the Late Stone age populations in Russian Karelia, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 47, 103771.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Askeyev A., Askeyev O., Askeyev I., Monakhov S. and Sparks T.H., 2023b – Historical and Current Distribution of the Brown Trout, European Grayling and Volga Nase in Small Rivers in the Republic of Tatarstan, Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 25, 2, 39-50.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Askeyev O., Monakhov S., Askeyev I., Askeyev A. and Sparks T. H., 2023c – Fish assemblages in lakes along environmental gradients at the eastern edge of Europe, Environmental Biology of Fishes, 106, 6, 1265-1276.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Askeyev A., Askeyev O., Askeyev I., Monakhov S. and Yanybaev N., 2024 – Long-term monitoring of fish abundance dynamics in the middle stretch of Mesha River (Tatarstan), Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 26, 2, 75-90.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bănăduc D., Sas A., Cianfaglione K., Barinova S. and Curtean-Bănăduc A., 2021 – The role of aquatic refuge habitats for fish, and threats in the context of climate change and human Impact, during seasonal hydrological drought in the Saxon villages area (Transylvania, Romania), Atmosphere, 12, 1209.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bănăduc D., Simić V., Cianfaglione K., Barinova S., Afanasyev S., Öktener A., McCall G., Simić S. and Curtean-Bănăduc A., 2022 ‒ Freshwater as a sustainable resource and generator of secondary resources in the 21^st century: stressors, threats, risks, management and protection strategies, and conservation approaches, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 16570, 1-30, 10.3390/ijerph192416570.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bănăduc D., Curtean-Bănăduc A., Barinova S., Lozano V. L., Afanasyev S., Leite T., and Cianfanglione K., 2024a – Multi-interacting natural and anthropogenic stressors on freshwater ecosystems: their current status and future prospects for 21st Century, Water, 16, 111483.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bănărescu P. M., 1964 ‒ Fauna Republicii Populare Române, Pisces-Osteichthyes, XIII, Edit. Academiei Republicii Populare Române, 959. (in Romanian)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Birzaks J., 2012 – Occurrence, abundance and biomass of fish in rivers of Latvia in accordance with river typology, Zoology and Ecology, 22, 1, 9-19.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blanck A., Tedesco P. and Lamouroux N., 2007 ‒ Relationships between life‐history strategies of European freshwater fish species and their habitat preferences, Freshwater biology, 52, 5, 843-859.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Caffrey J. M., Hayden B. and Walsh, T., 2007 ‒ Dace (Leuciscus leuciscus L.): an invasive fish species in Ireland, Central Fisheries Board.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Degerman E. and Sers B., 1992 – Fish assemblages in Swedish streams, Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research, 67, 61-71.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fieseler C. and Wolter C., 2006 – A fish-based typology of small temperate rivers in the northeastern lowlands of Germany, Limnologica, 36, 2-16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gregory K., 2006 – The human role in changing river channels, Geomorphology, 79, 172-191.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Humpl M., 2006 – Relating fish assemblage variability to environmental gradients in small and mid-sized streams of the Elbe basin (Czech Republic), Electronic Journal of Ichthyology, 1, 15-25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jurajda P., Janáč M., Valová Z. and Streck G., 2010 – Fish community in the chronically polluted middle Elbe River, Folia Zoologica, 59, 2, 157-168.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kottelat M. and Freyhof J., 2007 – Handbook of European freshwater fishes (Vol. 13), Cornol, Switzerland: Publications Kottelat.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lamouroux N. and Souchon Y., 2002 – Simple predictions of instream habitat model outputs for fish habitat guilds in large streams, Freshwater Biology, 47, 8,1531-1542.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lusk S. and Pivnicka K., 2009 – Fish assemblages in the Czech Republic ‒ species saturation. Frequency and changes along the longitudinal stream gradient, Acta Universitatis Environmentalica, 1, 45-68.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maire A., Laffaille P., Maire J. and Buisson, L., 2016 – Identification of priority areas for the conservation of stream fish assemblages: implications for river management in France, River Research and Applications, 234, 524-537.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maitland P. and Linsell K., 2009 – Atlas of fishes (a guide to freshwater fish species in Europe), translated and supplemented by V. Sideleva. Amphora, St. Petersburg, 287. (in Russian)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Makeeva A., Pavlov D. and Pavlov D., 2011 – Atlas of juveniles of freshwater fish of Russia, Moscow, Partnerships of scientific publications KMK, 383. (in Russian)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matthews W., 2012 – Patterns in freshwater fish ecology, Springer Science & Business Media.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moss B., Kosten S., Meerhoff M., Battarbee R. and Jeppesen E. M., 2011 – Allied attack: climate change and eutrophication, Inland Waters, 1, 2, 101-105.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Păpuc, T. 2023 – A short note on dace (Leuciscus leuciscus) in Someș River, Romania, Animal Biology & Animal Husbandry, 15, 2, 90-92.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pekarik L., Svatora M. and Kosco J., 2011 – Longitudinal structures of fish assemblages in a minimally disturbed stream, Biologia, 66, 886-893.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pretty J., Harrison S., Shepherd D. J., Smith C., Hildrew A. and Hey R., 2003 – River rehabilitation and fish populations: assessing the benefit of instream structures, Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 2, 251-265.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Saly P., Takacs P., Kiss I., Bíró, P. and Erős, T., 2011 – The relative influence of spatial context and catchment and site-scale environmental factors on stream fish assemblages in a human-modified landscape, Ecology of freshwater fish, 20, 251-262.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Santoul F., Cayrou J., Mastrorillo S. and Cereghino R., 2005 – Spatial patterns of the biological traits of fresh water fish communities in south-west France, Journal of Fish Biology, 66, 301-314.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sutela T., Vehanen T. and Jounela P., 2020 – Longitudinal patterns of fish assemblages in European boreal streams, Hydrobiologia, 847, 15, 3277-3290.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Suuronen P. and Bartley D. M., 2014 – Challenges in managing inland fisheries using the ecosystem approach, Boreal Environment Research, 19, 3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Swets J., 1988 – Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems, Science, 240, 1285-1293.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Takács P., Csoma E., Eros T. and Sandor N. A., 2008 – Distribution patterns and genetic variability of three stream dwelling fish species, Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 54, 209-303.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ter Braak C. and van Dam H., 1989 – Inferring pH from diatoms: a comparison of old and new calibration methods, Hydrobiologia, 178, 209-223.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vlach P., Dusek J., Svátora M. and Moravec, P., 2005 – Fish assemblage structure, habitat and microhabitat preference of five fish species in a small stream, Folia Zoologica-Praha, 54, 4, 421.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weber C., Schager E. and Peter A., 2009 – Habitat diversity and fish assemblage structure in local river widenings: a case study on a Swiss river, River Research and Applications, 25, 6, 687-701.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wheeler A. and Jones A. K., 1989 – Fishes, Cambridge University Press, 224.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Distribution of Common Chub, Common Dace and Roach Across Environmental Gradients on the East Edge of Europe

Abstract

Paradigm

My account