Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Methodology for Reducing the Negative Impact of Non-Conformance in Technical Personnel Activity in the System of Continuing Airworthiness of Aircraft

Open Access
|Oct 2025

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Three-level model for determining control actions in the Human Factor Control System (HFCS). CA: Control Actions level; CI: Complex (probabilistic) Indicators level; SF: Recorded Specific Factors of “non-conformance” in staff activity.
Three-level model for determining control actions in the Human Factor Control System (HFCS). CA: Control Actions level; CI: Complex (probabilistic) Indicators level; SF: Recorded Specific Factors of “non-conformance” in staff activity.

Percentage distribution of non-conformance in the activities of technical personnel_

F1F2F3F4F5
21.5%16.2%22.9%25.1%14.3%

Complex indicators Kij included in the generalized factor F1_

K11Violations and erroneous actions during aircraft maintenance procedures
K12Allowing personnel to work without the necessary training
K13Use of non-certified tools by personnel
K14Performance of work by personnel without appropriate authorization (not specified in licenses)
K15Releasing an aircraft for operation with malfunctions not listed in the relevant documents (MMEL and MEL)

Ranking of Control Actions_

FiF1F2F3F4F5
H(Fi)5.163.492.472.321.54
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 20
Submitted on: Jul 7, 2025
Accepted on: Aug 28, 2025
Published on: Oct 31, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Vladimir Shestakov, Kirils Kļepackis, Nikolay Kuleshov, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.