Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Dynamic Interplay Between the Renewable Kuznets Curve (RKC) and Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypotheses: Fresh Evidence from the European Union Countries Cover

The Dynamic Interplay Between the Renewable Kuznets Curve (RKC) and Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypotheses: Fresh Evidence from the European Union Countries

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Abid, L., Kacem, S., Saadoui, H., (2024), Addressing the Environmental Kuznets Curve in the West African countries: exploring the roles of FDI, corruption and renewable energy, Journal of Knowledge Economy, 15, 20491-20515.
  2. Alam, F., (2024), Environmental Kuznets Curve and sustainable development in OECD countries: A panel data analysis, European Journal of Development Studies, 4(6), 9-15.
  3. Al-Mulali, U., Solarin, S.A., Sheau-Ting, L., Ozturk, I., (2016), Does moving towards renewable energy causes water and land inefficiency? An empirical investigation, Energy Policy, 93, 303-314.
  4. Baek, J., (2016), Do nuclear and renewable energy improve the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States, Ecological Indicators, 66, 352-356.
  5. Balezentis, T., Streimikiene, D., Zhangh, T., Liobikiene, G., (2019), The role of bioenergy in greenhouse gas emission reduction in EU countries: an Environmental Kuznets Curve modelling, Resources Conservation and Recycling, 142, 225-231.
  6. Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Roubaud, D., Farhani, S., (2018), How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions?, Energy Policy, 113, 356-367.
  7. Bekhet, H.A., Othman, N.S., (2018), The role of renewable energy to validate dynamic interaction between CO2, emissions and GDP towards sustainable development in Malaysia, Energy Economics, 72, 47-61.
  8. Bilgili, F., Kocak, E., Bulut, U., (2016), The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 838–845.
  9. Bölük, G., Mert, M., (2014), Fossil and renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries, Energy, 60, 1-8.
  10. Bölük, G., Mert, M., (2015), The Renewable Energy, Growth and Environmental Kuznets Curve in Turkey: an ARDL Approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 52, 587–595.
  11. Breusch, T., Pagan, A., (1980), The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Application to Model Specification in Econometrics, Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253.
  12. Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Zhong, Z., (2019), CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China, Renewable Energy, 131, 208-216.
  13. Chien, F., (2022), How renewable energy and non-renewable energy affect environmental excellence in N-11 economies?, Renewable Energy, 196, 526–534.
  14. Danish, Zhang, B., Wang, B., Wang, Z., (2017), Role of renewable energy and nonrenewable energy consumption on EKC: evidence from Pakistan, Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 855-864.
  15. Destek, M.A., Sinha, A., (2020), Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries, Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118537.
  16. Dogan, E., Seker, F., (2016), Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy, Renewable Energy, 94, 429-439.
  17. European Environment Agency (EEA), (2025), Total greenhouse gas emissions per capita (https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/maps-and-charts/greenhouse-gases-viewer-data-viewers) accessed on 5.01.2025.
  18. Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., Bazilian, M.D., Wagner, N.; Gorini, R. (2019), The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation, Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 38-50.
  19. Grossman, G.M., Krueger A.B., (1991), Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, Working Paper No. 3914, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  20. Grossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B., (1995), Economic growth and the environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353–377.
  21. Kao, C., Chiang, M., (2000), On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data, Advances in Econometrics, 15 (1), 109-141.
  22. Kuznets, S., (1955), Economic growth and income inequality, American Economic Review, 45, 1–28.
  23. Jebli, M.B., Youssef, S.B., (2015), The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 47, 173-185.
  24. Koc, S., Bulus, G.C., (2020), Testing validity of the EKC hypothesis in South Korea: the role of renewable energy and trade openness, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(23), 29043-29054.
  25. Kostakis, I., Armaos, S., Abeliotis, K., Theodoropoulou, E., (2023), The investigation of EKC within CO2 emissions framework: Empirical evidence from selected cross-correlated countries, Sustainability Analytics and Modeling, 3, 100015.
  26. Leal, P.I., Marques, A.C., (2020), Rediscovering the EKC hypothesis for the 20 highest CO2 emitters among OECD countries by level of globalization, International Economics, 164, 36-47.
  27. Luo, H., Sun, Y., (2024), The impact of energy efficiency on ecological footprint in the presence of EKC: evidence from G20 countries, Energy, 304, 132081.
  28. Makarov, I., Alataș, S., (2024), Production-and consumption-based emissions in carbon exporters and importers: A large panel data analysis for the EKC hypothesis, Applied Energy, 363, 123063.
  29. Menegaki, A.N., Tsagarakis, K.P., (2015), Rich enough to go renewable, but too early to leave fossil energy?, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41(C), 1465-1477.
  30. Moutinho, V., Robaina, M., (2016), Is the share of renewable energy sources determining the CO2 kWh and income relation in electricity generation?, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 902-914.
  31. Mutașcu, M., (2025), Beyond the EKC: Economic development and environmental degradation in the US, Ecological Economics, 232, 108567.
  32. Nabaweesi, J., Kigongo, T.K., Buyinza, F., Adaramola, M.S., Namagembe, S., Nkote, I.N., (2024), Investigating the modern renewable energy-environmental Kuznets curve (REKC) hypothesis for East Africa Community (EAC) countries, Technological Sustainability, 3 (1), 76-95.
  33. Naqvi, S.A.A., Shah, S.A.R., Anwar, S., Raza, H., (2021), Renewable energy, economic development, and ecological footprint nexus: fresh evidence of renewable energy environment Kuznets curve (RKC) from income groups, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 2031-2051.
  34. Özbek, S., Naimoglu, M., (2025), The effectiveness of renewable energy technology under the EKC hypothesis and the impact of fossil and nuclear energy investments on the UK’s Ecological Footprint, Energy, 322, 135351.
  35. Panayoutou, T., (1993), Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development, ILO Working Papers, WEP 2-22/WP.238.
  36. Pata, K.U., (2018), Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2, emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks, Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770-779.
  37. Pata, U.K., Bulut, U., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Chovancova, J., (2025), Does income growth affect renewable energy or carbon emissions first? A Fourier-based analysis for renewable and fossil energies, Energy Strategy Reviews, 57, 101615.
  38. Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., Smith, R.P., (1999), Pooled Mean Group estimation of dynamic heterogeneus panels, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94 (446), 621-634.
  39. Pesaran, M.H., (2004), General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435, University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics: Cambridge, MA, USA. Available online: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/446 (Accessed on 3 March 2025).
  40. Pesaran, M.H., (2007), A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 265-312.
  41. Rahman, H., Voumik, L. Ch., Rahman, M., Majunder, S. Ch., (2024), Scrutinizing the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve in the context of foreign direct investment, trade and renewable energy in Bangladesh: impeding from ARDL method, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 12619-12638.
  42. Sarkodie, S.A., Samuel, A., (2018), Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa, Science of Total Environment, 643, 1590-1601.
  43. Shafik N., Bandyopadyay S., (1992), Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Timeserves and Cross-Country Evidence, Background Paper for World Development Report, World Bank.
  44. Simionescu, M., (2021), Revised environmental Kuznets Curve in CEE countries. Evidence from a panel threshold models for economic sector, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 60881-60899.
  45. Sinha, A., Shahbaz, M., (2018), Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: role of renewable energy generation in India, Renewable Energy, 119, 703-711.
  46. Sugiawan, Y., Managi, S., (2016), The environmental Kuznets curve in Indonesia: exploring the potential of renewable energy, Energy Policy, 98, 187-198.
  47. Wang, Q., Zhang, F., Li, R., (2023a), Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in 208 countries: The roles of trade openness, human capital, renewable energy and natural resource rent, Environmental Research, 216, 114637.
  48. Wang, Q., li, C., Li, R., (2023b), Could digital economy increase renewable energy and reduce carbon emissions? Empirical evidence on EKC in 67 countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 77150-77164.
  49. Yilanci, V., Gorus, M.S., Andreoni, V., (2023), Reinvestigating of the validity of EKC hypothesis extend with energy: A time-varying analysis for the United Kingdom, Journal of Cleaner Production, 428, 139284.
  50. World Bank, (2025a), World Development Indicators. GDP per capita (NY.GDP.PCAP. PP. KD). (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD?view=chart) accessed 11.01.2025.
  51. World Bank, (2025b), World Development Indicators. Renewable energy consumption (EG.FEC.RNEW.ZS)
  52. (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.FEC.RNEW.ZS?view=chart) accessed 11.01.2025.
  53. Yao, S., Zhang, S., Zhang, X., (2019), Renewable energy, carbon emissions and economic growth: A revised environmental Kuznets curve perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1338-1352.
  54. Zambrano-Monserrate, M.A., Silva-Zambrano, C.A., Davalos-Penafiel, J.L., Zambrano-Mosenrrate, A., Ruano, M.A., (2018), Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Peru: the role of renewable electricity, petroleum, and dry natural gas, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 4170-4178.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2025-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2285-3065 | Journal ISSN: 1584-2339
Language: English
Page range: 104 - 117
Submitted on: May 1, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2025
|
Published on: Oct 16, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Olimpia Neagu, Andrei Marius Anghelina, Samuel Nicoară, published by Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.