Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Environmental Kuznets Curve revisited: economic complexity and ecological footprint in the most complex economies of the world Cover

The Environmental Kuznets Curve revisited: economic complexity and ecological footprint in the most complex economies of the world

Open Access
|Jan 2022

References

  1. 1. Abbasi, K.R.; Lv, K.; Radulescu, M.; Shaikh, P.A. (2021), Economic complexity, tourism, energy prices, and environmental degradation in the top economic countries: fresh panel evidence, Environmental Science and Pollution Research (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15312-4).10.1007/s11356-021-15312-4
  2. 2. Ahmed, Z.; Zafar, M.W.; Ali, S. (2020a), Linking urbanization, human capital,and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: an empirical analysis, Sustainable Cities and Society 55:10206410.1016/j.scs.2020.102064
  3. 3. Ahmed, Z.; Asghar, M.M.; Malik, M.N.; Nawaz, K. (2020b), Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China, Resources Policy 67:101677.10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677
  4. 4. Al-Mulali, U.; Weng-Wai, C.; Sheau-Ting, L.; Mohammed, A.H. (2015), Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation, Ecological Indicators, 48: 315–323.10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029
  5. 5. Al-Mulali, U.; Ozturk, I. (2016), The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in advanced economies: The role of energy prices, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54: 1622-1631 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.131).10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.131
  6. 6. Ansari, M.A.; Haider, S.; Khan, N.A. (2020), Environmental Kuznets Curve revisited: An analysis using ecological and material footprint, Ecological Indicators, 115: 106416 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106416).10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106416
  7. 7. Apergis, N.; Payne, J.E. (2010), The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: Evidence from the commonwealth of independent states, Energy Policy, 38 (1): 650–655 (doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.029).10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.029
  8. 8. Baltagi, B. H. (2012), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (4th ed.). Wiley.
  9. 9. Baltagi, B. H. & Pesaran, M. H. (2007), Heterogeneity and Cross Section Dependence in Panel Data Models: Theory and Applications: Introduction, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2): 229–232 (https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.955).10.1002/jae.955
  10. 10. Bello, M.O.; Solarin, S.A.; Yen, Y.Y. (2018), The impact of electricity consumption on CO2 emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footprint: the role of hydropower in an emerging economy, Journal of Environmental Management, 219: 218–230 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.101).10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.101
  11. 11. Bilgili, F.; Koçak, M.; Bulut, Ü. (2016), The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions. A revisited Environmental Kuznets approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54: 838-845. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080).10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
  12. 12. Bilgili, F.; Koçak, E.; Bulut, Ü.; Kuloğlu, A. (2017), The impact of urbanization on energy intensity: panel data evidence considering cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity, Energy, 133: 242–256. (https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2017.05.121).10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.121
  13. 13. Boleti E.; Garas A.; Kyriakou A.; Lapatinas A., (2021), Economic complexity and environmental performance: evidence from a world sample, Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 0123456789:251–270 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-021-09750-0).10.1007/s10666-021-09750-0
  14. 14. Breusch, T.; and Pagan, A. (1980), The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Application to Model Specification in Econometrics, The Review of Economic Studies, 47: 239–253. (http://dx.doi:10.2307/2297111).10.2307/2297111
  15. 15. Britto, G.; Romero, J.; Freitas, E. E.; Coelho, C. (2017), The Great Divide: Economic Complexity and Development Paths in Brazil and South Korea, CEPAL Review, 127: 191-213 (https://doi.org/10.5151/engpro-1enei-078).10.18356/d06fff2f-en
  16. 16. Can, M.; Jebli, B.; Mehdi and Brusselaers, J. (2021), Exploring the impact of trading green products on the environment: introducing the Green Openness Index, MPRA Paper No.106730, (https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/106730/).10.2139/ssrn.3804046
  17. 17. Can, M. and Gozgor, G. (2017), The impact of economic complexity on carbon emissions: evidence from France, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(19):16364–16370 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9219-7).10.1007/s11356-017-9219-7
  18. 18. Chavez, J.C.; Mosqueda, M.T.; Gomez-Zaldivar, M. (2017), Economic complexity and regional growth performance: evidence from the Mexican economy, The Review of Regional Studies, 47: 201-219 (http://journal.srsa.org/ojs/index.php/RRS/article/download/876/pdf).10.52324/001c.8023
  19. 19. Chu, L. K. (2021), Economic structure and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: new evidence from economic complexity, Applied Economics Letters, 28(7):612–616. (https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1767280)10.1080/13504851.2020.1767280
  20. 20. Chu, L.K.; Le, N.T.M. (2021), Environmental quality and the role of economic policy uncertainty, economic complexity, renewable energy, and energy intensity: the case of G7 countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15666-9).10.21203/rs.3.rs-449086/v1
  21. 21. Cole, M.A.; Rayner, A.J.; Bates, J.M. (1997), The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis, Environment and Development Economics, 2: 401–416. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X97000211).10.1017/S1355770X97000211
  22. 22. Danish; Ulucak, R.; Khan, S.U.D. (2020), Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization, Sustainable Cities and Society, 54:101996. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996).10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996
  23. 23. Demiral, M. (2016), Knowledge, Complexity and Economic Growth: Multi-country Evidence by Development Stages, Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, VI(1): 1–27 (https://tinyurl.com/75udr66u).
  24. 24. Dogan, B.; Saboori, B., Can, M. (2019), Does economic complexity matter or environmental degradation? An empirical analysis for different stages of development, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(31):31900–31912. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06333-1).10.1007/s11356-019-06333-1
  25. 25. Dogan, E.; Ulucak, R.; Kocak, E.; Isik, C. (2020 a), The use of ecological footprint in estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity, Science of the Total Environment, 723: 138063 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063
  26. 26. Dogan, B.; Madaleno M.; Tiwari, A.K; Hammoudeh S. (2020b), Impacts of export quality on environmental degradation: does income matter?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(12):13735–13772 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07371-5).10.1007/s11356-019-07371-5
  27. 27. Domini, G. (2019), Patterns of Specialisation and Economic Complexity Through the Lens of Universal Exhibitions,1855–1900, LEM Working Papers Series 2019/20 (Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), 2019) (http://hdl.handle.net/10419/203110).
  28. 28. Dreher, A. (2006), Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a New Index of Globalization, Applied Economics 38, 10: 1091-1110.10.1080/00036840500392078
  29. 29. Felipe, J.; Kumar, U.; Abdon, A.; Bacate, M. (2012), Product complexity and economic development, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(1): 36–68. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2011.08.003).10.1016/j.strueco.2011.08.003
  30. 30. Figge, L.; Oebels, K.; Offermans, A. (2017), The effects of globalization on ecological footprints: an empirical analysis, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19: 863–876 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9769-8).10.1007/s10668-016-9769-8
  31. 31. Fortunato, P.; Razo, C.; Vrolijk, K. (2015), Operationalizing the product space: A road map to export diversification. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, No. 219 (https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:unc:dispap:219).
  32. 32. Gala, P., Rocha, I., & Magacho, G. (2018), The structuralist revenge: economic complexity as an important dimension to evaluate growth and development, Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 38(2): 219–236 (https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572018v38n02a01).10.1590/0101-31572018v38n02a01
  33. 33. Gormus, S.; Aydin, M. (2020), Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using innovation: new evidence from the top 10 innovative economies, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27:27904–27913 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09110-7).10.1007/s11356-020-09110-7
  34. 34. Global Footprint Network. Available online: http://data.footprintnetwork.org (accessed on 4 July 2020).
  35. 35. Grossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B. (1995), Economic growth and the environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2): 353-377. (https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-bstract/110/2/353/1826336).10.2307/2118443
  36. 36. Hartmann, D. (2014), Economic complexity and human development: How economic diversification and social networks affect human agency and welfare (1st ed.). Routledge. (https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203722084).
  37. 37. Hartmann, D.; Guevara, M. R.; Jara-Figueroa, C.; Aristarán, M.; Hidalgo, C. A. (2017) Linking Economic Complexity, Institutions, and Income Inequality, World Development, 93:75–93 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020).10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020
  38. 38. Hausmann, R.; Hwang, J.; and Rodrik, D. (2007), What you export matters, Journal of Economic Growth, 12:1–25(https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4).10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4
  39. 39. Hausmann, R.; Hidalgo, C.A; Bustos. S.; Coscia. M.; Chung. S.; Jimenez, J.; Simoes, A.; Yildirim, M. (2011), The atlas of economic complexity. Cambridge, MA: Puritan Press, 2011. Available online: https://atlas.media.mit.edu/publications/ (Accessed 1 July 2021).
  40. 40. Hausmann, R.; Hidalgo, C. A.; Bustos, S.; Coscia, M.; Simoes, A. & Yildirim, M. A. (2014), The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. MIT Press, 2014. Available online: https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/30678659/HarvardMIT_AtlasOfEconomicComplexity_Part_I.pdf? (Accessed 3 July 2021).10.7551/mitpress/9647.001.0001
  41. 41. Hausmann, R.; Hidalgo, C. A.; Stock, D. P.; Yildirim, M. A. (2020), Implied Comparative Advantage. Available online: (https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cid/publications/faculty-working-papers/implied-comparative-advantage) Accessed 2 July 2021.
  42. 42. Hidalgo, C. A. & Hausmann, R. (2009), The building blocks of economic complexity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(26): 10570–10575 (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106).10.1073/pnas.0900943106
  43. 43. Hidalgo, C. (2021), Economic complexity theory and applications, Nature Reviews Physics, 3: 92-113 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00275-1).10.1038/s42254-020-00275-1
  44. 44. Ibragimov, R. & Phillips, P.C.B. (2008), Regression Asymptotics Using Martingale Convergence Methods, Econometric Theory, 24: 888–947 (https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466608080365).10.1017/S0266466608080365
  45. 45. Ikram, M.; Xia, W.; Fareed, Z.; Shahzad, U.; Rafique, M.Z. (2021), Exploring the nexus between economic complexity, economic growth and ecological footprint, Contextual evidence from Japan, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47:191460 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101460).10.1016/j.seta.2021.101460
  46. 46. Kuznets, S. (1955), Economic growth and income inequality, American Economic Review, 45(1): 1–28 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581).
  47. 47. Lapatinas, A.; Garas, A.; Boleti, E.; Kiriakou A. (2019), Economic complexity and environmental performance: Evidence from a world sample, MPRA Paper No. 92833 (https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/92833).
  48. 48. Laverde-Rojas, H.; Guevara-Fletcher, D.; Camacho-Murillo, A. (2021), Economic growth, economic complexity, and carbon dioxide emissions the case of Columbia, Heliyon, 7: e07188 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07188).10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07188
  49. 49. Lin, D.; Hanscom, L.; Martindill, J.; Borucke, M.; Cohen, L.; Galli, A.; Lazarus, E.; Zokai, G.; Iha, K.; Eaton, D.; et al. (2019), Working Guidebook to the National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts; Global Footprint Network: Oakland, CA, USA, 2019, Available online: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/ (accessed on 5 July 2021).
  50. 50. Lo, A. W. and MacKinlay, A.C. (1988), Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence From a Simple Specification Test, Review of Financial Studies, 1: 41–66 (https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/1.1.41).10.1093/rfs/1.1.41
  51. 51. Lo, A. W. and Mackinlay, A. C. (1989), The size and power of the variance ratio test in finite samples - a Monte-Carlo investigation, Journal of Econometrics, 40: 203-238 (https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(89)90083-3).10.1016/0304-4076(89)90083-3
  52. 52. Müller-Fürstenberger, G.; Wagner, M. (2007), Exploring the environmental Kuznets hypothesis: theoretical and econometric problems, Ecological Economics, 62 (3):648-660 (doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.005).10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.005
  53. 53. Nathaniel, S.P. (2021), Economic complexity versus ecological footprint in the era of globalization: evidence from ASEAN countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15360-w).10.1007/s11356-021-15360-w
  54. 54. Orubu, C.O.; Omotor, D. G. (2011), Environmental quality and economic growth: searching for Environmental Kuznets Curves for air and water pollutants in Africa, Energy Policy 39(7), 4178–4188. [doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.025].10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.025
  55. 55. Ozturk, I.; Al-Mulali, U.; Saboori, B. (2016), Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint, Environmental SciencePollution Research, 23:1916–1928 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5447-x).10.1007/s11356-015-5447-x
  56. 56. Ourens, G. (2012), Can the Method of Reflections Help Predict Future Growth? Documento de Trabajo/FCS-DE; 17/12 (Universidad de la Republica, 2012). (https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/2241).
  57. 57. Pao, H.T.; Tsai, C.M. (2010), CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries, Energy Policy, 38(12): 7850–7860 (doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.045).10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.045
  58. 58. Pedroni, P. (1999), Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 653–670 (doi:10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653).10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14
  59. 59. Pedroni, P. (2001a), Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels. In Advances in Econometrics; Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels; In Badi, H., Thomas, B.B, Fomby, R., Hill, C., Eds.; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, Volume 15, 93–130. Available online: https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15004-2 (accessed on 12 July 2021).10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15004-2
  60. 60. Pedroni, P. (2001b), Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83:727–731 (doi:10.1162/003465301753237803).10.1162/003465301753237803
  61. 61. Pedroni, P. (2004), Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis, Econometric Theory, 20: 597–625 (doi:10.1017/s0266466604203073).10.1017/S0266466604203073
  62. 62. Pesaran, M. H. (2004), General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435, 2004. Available online: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/446 (accessed 2 July 2021).
  63. 63. Pesaran, M.H. (2007), A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence, Journal of Applied Economics, 22: 265–312 (doi:10.1002/jae.951).10.1002/jae.951
  64. 64. Poncet, S.; de Waldemar, F.S. (2013), Economic complexity and growth. Evidence from China, Revue Economique, Vol.64, Issue 2013: 495-503 (https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.643.0495).10.3917/reco.643.0495
  65. 65. Rafique, M.Z.; Nadeem, A.M Xia, W.; Ikram, M., Shoaib, M.; Shazhzad, U. (2021), Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator, Environment, Development and Sustainability, (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01625-4).10.1007/s10668-021-01625-4
  66. 66. Romero, J. P., & Gramkow, C. (2021), Economic Complexity and Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity, World Development, Vol.139: 105317 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105317).10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105317
  67. 67. Rudolph, A.; Figge L. (2017), Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization? Ecological Indicators, 81:348–361 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.060).10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.060
  68. 68. Sabir, S.; Gorus, M.S. (2019), The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(32):33387-33398 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06458-3).10.1007/s11356-019-06458-3
  69. 69. Saboori, B.; Sulaiman, J.; Mohd, S. (2012), Economic growth and CO emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Energy Policy, 51:184–191 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.065).10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.065
  70. 70. Savina, G.; Haelg, F.; Potrafke, N.; Sturm, J.-E. (2019), The KOF Globalisation Index - Revisited, Review of International Organizations, 14(3): 543-574 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2).10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
  71. 71. Shahbaz, M.; Lean, H.H.; Shabbir, M. S. (2012), Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 (5):2947–2953 (doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.015).10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.015
  72. 72. Shahzad, U.; Fareed, Z.; Shahzad, F: Shahzad, K. (2021), Investigating the nexus between economic complexity, energy consumption and ecological footprint for the United States: New insights from quantile methods, Journal of Cleaner Production, 279:123806 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123806).10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123806
  73. 73. Stojkoski, V.; Utkovski, Z. & Kocarev, L. (2016), The impact of services on economic complexity: service sophistication as a route for economic growth, PLoS ONE, 11: e0161633 (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161633).10.1371/journal.pone.0161633
  74. 74. Tacchella, A., Mazzilli, D. & Pietronero, L. (2018), A dynamical systems approach to gross domestic product forecasting, Nature Physics, 14: 861–865 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0204-y).10.1038/s41567-018-0204-y
  75. 75. Wackernagel, M.; Rees, W. (1996), Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth, New Society Publishers, The New Catalyst Bioregional Series.
  76. 76. Wagner, M., (2015), The environmental Kuznets curve, cointegration and nonlinearity, Journal of Applied Economics, 30 (6): 948-967 (DOI: 10.1002/jae.2421).10.1002/jae.2421
  77. 77. Wagner, M.; Hong, S.H. (2016), Cointegrating polynomial regressions: fully modified OLS estimation and inference, Econometric Theory, 32: 1289-1315 (doi:10.1017/S0266466615000213).10.1017/S0266466615000213
  78. 78. Wang, S.S.; Zhou, D.Q.; Zhou, P.; Wang, Q.W. (2011), CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China: a panel data analysis, Energy Policy, 39(9), 4870–4875. [doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.032].10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.032
  79. 79. Wang, Z.; Ben, Jebli; M., Madaleno, M.; Doğan, B.; Shahzad, U. (2021), Does export product quality and renewable energy induce carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from leading complex and renewable energy economies, Renewable Energy, 171:360–370. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.066).10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.066
  80. 80. Westerlund, J. (2005), New simple tests for panel cointegration, Econometric Reviews, 24: 297–316 (doi:10.1080/07474930500243019).10.1080/07474930500243019
  81. 81. Zhu, S. & Li, R. (2017), Economic complexity, human capital and economic growth: empirical research based on cross-country panel data, Applied Economics, 49: 3815–3828.10.1080/00036846.2016.1270413
  82. 82. Yalta, A. Y.; & Yalta, T. (2021), Determinants of Economic Complexity in MENA Countries. Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 6(1):5–16. (https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/joeep/issue/60112/825017).
  83. 83. Yilanci, V., & Pata, U. K. (2020), Investigating the EKC hypothesis for China: the role of economic complexity on ecological footprint, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26): 32683–32694 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09434-4).10.1007/s11356-020-09434-4
  84. 84. www.footprintnetwork.org.
  85. 85. http://data.worldbank.org.
  86. 86. https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2022-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2285-3065 | Journal ISSN: 1584-2339
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 99
Submitted on: Aug 1, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jan 1, 2022
|
Published on: Jan 24, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Olimpia Neagu, Mădălin-Ioan Neagu, published by Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.