Have a personal or library account? Click to login
When Care Meets Capitalism: Organizational Wellbeing in Romania Cover

When Care Meets Capitalism: Organizational Wellbeing in Romania

By: Raluca Mălan  
Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Abraham, J., & White, L. (2017). Tracking the changing landscape of corporate wellness companies. Health Affairs, 36(2), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1158
  2. Agarwal, P. (2020). Shattered but smiling: Human resource management and the wellbeing of hotel employees during COVID-19. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 93, 102765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102765
  3. Aryanti, R. D., Sari, E. Y. D., & Widiana, H. S. (2020). A literature review of workplace well-being. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Community Development (ICCD 2020) (Vol. 477, pp. 1–6). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201017.067
  4. Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed., p. 420). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  5. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism (G. Elliott, Trans.). Verso.Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth (C. Porter, Trans.). Princeton University Press.
  6. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed., pp. 468–498, 564–588). Oxford University Press.
  7. Burlakova, I., Volkova, E., Kryukova, E., & Stepanov, A. (2020). Features of corporate well-being. In Corporate management: From creation to success (pp. 142–154). Moscow: INFRA-M.
  8. Chakraborty, S., & Mahanta, A. (2019). Employee wellbeing – Are organizations addressing it the correct way? IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences, 14(2), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.21013/jmss.v14.n1.p3
  9. Coppoletta, F. N., et al. (2024). Non-financial reporting in SMEs: A new approach to measure corporate well-being based on employee perception. Procedia Computer Science, 227, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.12.085
  10. Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2014). Being occupied: An embodied re-reading of organizational “wellness.” Organization, 21(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412473862
  11. Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76 (M. Bertani & A. Fontana, Eds.; D. Macey, Trans.). Picador. (Original work published 1975–1976)
  12. Global Wellness Institute. (2024). Wellness policy toolkit: Mental wellness. https://globalwellnessinstitute.org/mental-wellness
  13. Iluț, P. (1997). The qualitative approach in social sciences – Concepts and methods (pp. 74–97). Polirom.
  14. Mucchelli, A. (2002). Dictionary of qualitative methods in human and social sciences. Polirom.
  15. Reid, D. (1985). Industrial paternalism: Discourse and practice in nineteenth-century French mining and metallurgy. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 27(4), 579–607. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500011671
  16. Watson, D., Wallace, J., Land, C., & Patey, J. (2023). Re-organising wellbeing: Contexts, critiques and contestations of dominant wellbeing narratives. Organization, 30(3), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084231156267
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2025-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2066-0464 | Journal ISSN: 1224-8703
Language: English
Page range: 133 - 154
Published on: Oct 22, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Raluca Mălan, published by Babeș-Bolyai University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.