Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Deindustrialization and the Real-Estate– Development–Driven Housing Regime. The Case of Romania in Global Context Cover

Deindustrialization and the Real-Estate– Development–Driven Housing Regime. The Case of Romania in Global Context

By: Enikő Vincze  
Open Access
|Nov 2023

References

  1. Aalbers, M. B. (2017). The variegated financialization of housing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(4), 542–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12522
  2. Aalbers, M. B. (2019). Financial geography II: Financial geographies of housing and real estate. Progress in Human Geography, 43(2), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518819503
  3. Aalbers, M. B., & Christophers, B. (2014). Centring housing in political economy. Housing, Theory and Society, 31(4), 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2014.947082
  4. Aalbers, M. B., Fernandez, R., & Wijburg, G. (2020). The financialization of real estate. In P. Mader, D. Mertens, & N. van der Zwan (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of financialization (pp. 200–213). Routledge.
  5. Anderson, R. E., Dejankov, S., Pohl, G., & Claessons, S. (1997). Privatization and restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe. Viewpoint: Public policy for the private sector. Note no. 123. World Bank.
  6. Aralica, Z., & Nebojša, N. (2015). Regional patterns of deindustrialization and prospects for reindustrialization in South and Central East European countries. Wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Paper No. 118.
  7. Audycka, B. (2021). “The right to stay put” or “the right to decide”? The question of displacement in the revitalization of Łódź (Poland). Housing Studies, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2021.1992358
  8. Ban, C. (2012). Sovereign debt, austerity, and regime change: The case of Nicolae Ceausescu’s Romania. East European Politics and Societies, 26(4), 743–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325412465513
  9. Ban, C. (2014). Dependență și dezvoltare. Economia politică a capitalismului Românesc. Editura TACT.
  10. Ban, C. (2019). Dependent development at a crossroads? Romanian capitalism and its contradictions. West European Politics, 42(5), 1041–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1537045
  11. Baross, P., & Struyk, R. (1993). Housing transition in Eastern Europe: Progress and problems. Cities, 10(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-2751(93)90028-h
  12. Bartel, F. (2022). The triumph of broken promises. The end of the cold war and the rise of neoliberalism. Harvard University Press.
  13. Büdenbender, M., & Aalbers, M. B. (2019). How subordinate financialization shapes urban development: The rise and fall of Warsaw’s Służewiec business district. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(4), 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12791
  14. Burawoy, M. (2009). The extended case method. Four countries, four decades, four great transformations, and one theoretical tradition. California University Press.
  15. Chari, S., & Verdery, K. (2009). Thinking between the posts: Postcolonialism, postsocialism, and ethnography after the cold war. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 51(1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417509000024
  16. Chelcea, L. (2003). Ancestors, domestic groups, and the socialist state: Housing nationalization and restitution in Romania. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(4), 714–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417503000331
  17. Chelcea, L. (2006). Marginal Groups in Central Places: Gentrification, Property Rights and Post-socialist Primitive Accumulation (Bucharest, Romania). In E. György & Z. Kovács (Eds.), Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres: The Case of Central Europe (pp. 127-147). Pecs: Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
  18. Chelcea, L. (2008). Bucureștiul postindustrial: Memorie, dezindustrializare şi regenerare urbană. Polirom.
  19. Chelcea, L. (2015). Postindustrial ecologies: Industrial rubble, nature and the limits of representation. Parcours Anthropologiques (10), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.4000/pa.448
  20. Chelcea, L., Popescu, R., & Cristea, D. (2015). Who are the gentrifiers and how do they change central city neighbourhoods? Privatization, commodification, and gentrification in Bucharest. Geografie, 120(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2015120020113
  21. Chivu, L., Ciutacu, C., & Georgescu, G. (2017). Deindustrialization and reindustrialization in Romania. Economic strategy challenges. Palgrave Macmillan.
  22. Cirman, A. (2006). Housing tenure preferences in the post-privatisation period: The case of Slovenia. Housing Studies, 21(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030500391213
  23. Cirman, A. (2008). Intergenerational transfers as a response to changes in the housing market in Slovenia. European Journal of Housing Policy, 8(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616710802256710
  24. Clapham, D. (1995). Privatisation and the East European housing model. Urban Studies, 32(4-5), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989550012834
  25. Clapham, D., Hegedüs, J., Kintrea, K., Kay, H., & Tosics, I. (1996). Housing privatization in Eastern Europe. Greenwood Publishing Group.
  26. Clark, C., & Bahry, D. (1983). Dependent development: A socialist variant. International Studies Quarterly, 27(3), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600684
  27. Czirfusz, M., Barta, G., & Kukely, G. (2008). Re-industrialisation in the world and in Hungary. European Spatial Research and Policy, 15(2), 5–27.
  28. Dicken, P. (1992). Global Shift: The Internationalization of Economic Activity (2nd edition). London: Chapman Publishing Ltd.
  29. Fernandez, R., & Aalbers, M. B. (2019). Housing financialization in the global south: In search of a comparative framework. Housing Policy Debate, 30(4), 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2019.1681491
  30. Fina, Ș., Heider, B., & Raț, C. (2021). România inegală. Disparităţile socio-economice regionale din România. Bucharest. Research funded by Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Retrieved January 30, 2022, from https://romania.fes.de/ro/e/romania-inegala-disparitati-regionale-in-romania-cum-arata-si-cum-le-putem-depasi
  31. Fisher, L. M., & Jaffe, A. J. (2000). Restitution in transition countries. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 15(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010141604092
  32. Florea, I., & Dumitriu, M. (2022). Different debtors, different struggles: Foreign-currency housing loans and class tensions in Romania. Critical Housing Analysis, 9(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2022.9.1.542
  33. Florea, I., Gagyi, A., & Jacobsson, K. (2018). A field of contention: Evidence from housing struggles in Bucharest and Budapest. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(4), 712–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9954-5
  34. Gabor, D. (2012). The road to financialization in central and Eastern Europe: The early policies and politics of stabilizing transition. Review of Political Economy, 24(2), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2012.664333
  35. Gabor, D. (2013). The financialization of the Romanian economy: From central bank-led to dependent financialization, FESSUD studies, study 05. Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
  36. Gabor, Daniela (2018, October 29). The World Bank pushes fragile finance in the name of development, Financial Times. https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2018/10/29/1540799191000/The-World-Bank-pushes-fragile-finance-inthe-name-of-development-/
  37. Gabor, D., & Kohl, S. (2022). My home is an asset class: Study about the financialization of housing in Europe. Research funded by the GREENS/EFA. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.greens-efa.eu/en/article/document/my-home-is-an-asset-class
  38. Gagyi, Á., Jelinek, C., Pósfai, Z., & Vigvári, A. (2021). Semi-peripheral financialization and informal household solutions. Embedded scales of uneven development in Hungarian urban fringes. In M. Mikuš & P. Rodik (Eds.), Households and financialization in Europe. Mapping variegated patterns in semiperipheries (pp. 81-104). Routledge.
  39. Gagyi, A., & Mikuš, M. (2022). Housing finance in the aftermath of the foreign-currency mortgage crisis in Eastern Europe: Editorial. Critical Housing Analysis, 9(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2022.9.1.539
  40. Georgescu, F. (2021). Capitalism și capitaliști fără capital în România. Editura Academiei Române.
  41. Harvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of capital. Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Blackwell.
  42. Harvey, D. (2001). Globalization and the “spatial fix.” Geographische Revue, 3(2), 23–30.
  43. Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.
  44. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
  45. Harvey, D. (2010). The enigma of capital and the crises of capitalism. Oxford University Press.
  46. Hegedüs, J., Horváth, V., & Tosics, N. (2014). Economic and legal conflicts between landlords and tenants in the Hungarian private rental sector. International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2014.908571
  47. Hegedüs, J., Lux, M., & Teller, N. (2013). Social housing in transition countries. Routledge.
  48. Hegedüs, J., & Struyk, R. (2005). Housing finance. New and old models in Central Europe, Russia, and Kazakhstan. Open Society Institute.
  49. High, S., MacKinnon, L., & Perchard, A. (2017). The deindustrialization world: Confronting ruination in postindustrial places. The University of Chicago Press.
  50. Hofman, A., & Aalbers, M. B. (2019). A finance- and real estate-driven regime in the United Kingdom. Geoforum, 100, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.014
  51. Horobeț, A., & Popovici, O. (2017). Investiții străine directe: Evoluția și importanța lor în România. Studiu realizat în parteneriat de academia de studii economice bucurești și consiliul investitorilor străini.
  52. Ionașcu, E., de La Paz, P. T., & Mironiuc, M. (2019). The relationship between housing prices and market transparency. Evidence from the metropolitan European markets. Housing, Theory and Society, 38(1), 42–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1672577
  53. Kok, H. J. (2007). Restructuring retail property markets in Central Europe: Impacts on urban space. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-006-9068-z
  54. Kornai, J. (2006). The great transformation of Central Eastern Europe. Economics of Transition, 14(2), 207–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00252.x
  55. Kovács, Z. (1999). Cities from state-socialism to global capitalism: An introduction. GeoJournal, 49(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007048819606
  56. Krawczyński, M., Czyżewski, P., & Bocian, K. (2016). Reindustrialization: A challenge to the economy in the first quarter of the twenty-first century. Foundations of Management, 8(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/fman-2016-0009
  57. Kroes, H., & Ambrose, I. (1991). Problems, priorities and solutions in times of transition: Impressions from a seminar focusing on East European housing policies. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 8(3), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739108730271
  58. Lancione, M. (2017). Revitalising the uncanny: Challenging inertia in the struggle against forced evictions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(6), 1012–1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817701731
  59. Lancione, M. (2019). The politics of embodied urban precarity: Roma people and the fight for housing in Bucharest, Romania. Geoforum, 101, 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.008
  60. Lancione, M. (2020). Radical housing: On the politics of dwelling as difference. International Journal of Housing Policy, 20(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2019.1611121
  61. Leetmaa, K., & Bernt, M. (2022). Special issue Intro: Housing estates in the era of marketization – Governance practices and urban planning. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09976-8
  62. Lord, G. F., & Price, A. C. (1992). Growth ideology in a period of decline: Deindustrialization and restructuring, Flint style. Social Problems, 39(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1992.39.2.03x0053a
  63. Lux, M. (2003). Efficiency and effectiveness of housing policies in the Central and Eastern Europe countries. European Journal of Housing Policy, 3(3), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616710310001603712
  64. Lux, M., Cirman, A., Kährik, A., & Miaskowska-Daszkiewicz, K. (2018). Property restitution after 1990. In J. Hegedüs, M. Lux, & V. Horváth (Eds.), Private Rental Housing in Transition Countries (pp. 71–97). Palgrave Macmillan.
  65. Lux, M., & Mikeszova, M. (2012). Property restitution and private rental housing in transition: The case of the Czech Republic. Housing Studies, 27(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.629643
  66. Lux, M., & Sunega, P. (2014). Public housing in the postsocialist states of central and Eastern Europe: Decline and an open future. Housing Studies, 29(4), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2013.875986
  67. Lux, M., Sunega, P., & Kážmér, L. (2021). Intergenerational financial transfers and indirect reciprocity: Determinants of the reproduction of homeownership in the postsocialist Czech Republic. Housing Studies, 36(8), 1294–1317.
  68. Mandič, S. (2010). The changing role of housing assets in postsocialist countries. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-010-9186-5
  69. Mandič, S. (2018). Motives for home ownership: Before and after the transition. Housing, Theory and Society, 35(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2017.1329164
  70. Marcińczak, S., Gentile, M., Rufat, S., & Chelcea, L. (2014). Urban geographies of hesitant transition: Tracing socioeconomic segregation in post-ceauşescu Bucharest. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), 1399–1417. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12073
  71. Marx, K. (1887). Capital. A critique of political economy. Volume I. First English edition. Retrieved November 15, 2021, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf
  72. Mikuš, M. (2022). ‘New’ but ‘Squeezed’: Middle class and mortgaged homeownership in Croatia. Critique of Anthropology, 42(4), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x221139159
  73. Mikuš, M., & Rodik, P. (2021). Households and financialization in Europe. Mapping variegated patterns in semiperipheries. Routledge.
  74. Müller, M. (2020). In search of the global East: Thinking between North and South. Geopolitics, 25(3), 734–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1477757
  75. Müller, M., & Trubina, E. (2020). The global easts in global urbanism: Views from beyond North and South. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 61(6), 627–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1777443
  76. Nagy, B., Lengyel, I., & Udvari, B. (2017). Reindustrialization patterns in the postsocialist EU members: A comparative study between 2000 and 2017. European Journal of Comparative Economics, 17(2), 253–275.
  77. Pichler-Milanovich, N. (2001). Urban housing markets in central and Eastern Europe: Convergence, divergence or policy ‘collapse.’ European Journal of Housing Policy, 1(2), 145–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616710110083416
  78. Pike, A. (2020). Coping with deindustrialization in the global North and South. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 26(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2020.1730225
  79. Polanska, D. V. (2010). The emergence of gated communities in post-communist urban context: And the reasons for their increasing popularity. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25(3), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-010-9189-2
  80. Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press.
  81. Polukhina, E. (2022). Material culture, housing and identities in Russian postindustrial neighbourhoods. Housing Studies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2091114
  82. Popescu, C. (2014). Deindustrialization and urban shrinkage in Romania. What lessons for the spatial policy? Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 10(42), 181–202.
  83. Pósfai, Z., & Nagy, G. (2017). Crisis and the reproduction of core-periphery relations on the Hungarian housing market. European Spatial Research and Policy, 24(2), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/esrp-2017-0007
  84. Renaud, B. (1996). Housing finance in transition economies: The early years in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. The World Bank, Financial Sector Development Department.
  85. Renaud, B. (1999). The Financing of Social Housing in Integrating Financial Markets: A View from Developing Countries. Urban Studies, 36 (4), 755-773. http://10.1080/0042098993448
  86. Roberts, M. (2014). De-industrialisation and socialism. In: Michael Roberts Blog. Retrieved December 30, 2021, from https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/de-industrialisation-and-socialism/
  87. Rodrigues, J., Santos, A. C., & Teles, N. (2016). Semi-peripheral financialisation: The case of Portugal. Review of International Political Economy, 23(3), 480–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1143381
  88. Rowsthorn, R., & Ramaswamy, R. (1997). Deindustrialization – Its causes and implications. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved June 15, 2022, from https://www.imf.org/EXTERNAL/PUBS/FT/ISSUES10/INDEX.HTM
  89. Roy, F. (2008). Mortgage markets in central and Eastern Europe – A review of past experiences and future perspectives. European Journal of Housing Policy, 8(2), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616710802061953
  90. Rufat, S., & Marcińczak, S. (2020). The equalising mirage? Socioeconomic segregation and environmental justice in postsocialist Bucharest. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 35(3), 917–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09722-7
  91. Schindler, S., Gillespie, T., Banks, N., Bayırbağ, M. K., Burte, H., Kanai, J. M., & Sami, N. (2020). Deindustrialization in cities of the Global South. Area Development and Policy, 5(3), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2020.1725393
  92. Simion, G. (2016). Effects of postsocialist deindustrialization in Central-Eastern Europe. Results of an industrial site survey and GIS mapping in Bucharest City, Romania. Human Geographies – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography, 10(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2016.101.5
  93. Soaita, A. M. (2015). The meaning of home in Romania: Views from urban owner–occupiers. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9396-3
  94. Soaita, A. M. (2017). Strategies for in situ home improvement in Romanian large housing estates. Housing Studies, 27(7), 1008–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.725833
  95. Soaita, A. M., & Dewilde, C. (2019). A critical-realist view of housing quality within the post-communist EU states: Progressing towards a middle-range explanation. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(1), 44–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2017.1383934
  96. Soaita, A. M., & Dewilde, C. (2021). Housing stratification in Romania: Mapping a decade of change. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(3), 1055–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09788-8
  97. Stan, L. (1995). Romanian Privatization: Assessment of the First Five Years. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 28(4), 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-067X(95)00022-M
  98. Stephens, M., Lux, M., & Sunega, P. (2015). Postsocialist housing systems in Europe: Housing welfare regimes by default? Housing Studies, 30(8), 1210–1234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2015.1013090
  99. Stojčić, N., & Aralica, Z. (2017). Choosing right from wrong: Industrial policy and (de)industrialization in Central and Eastern Europe. Working Papers 1703. Ekonomski Institut Zagreb. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://www.eizg.hr/
  100. Strom, E. (1996). The political context of real estate development: Central city rebuilding in Berlin. European Urban and Regional Studies, 3(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649600300101
  101. Struyk, R. (1996). Economic restructuring of the former Soviet bloc: The case of housing. The Urban Institute Press.
  102. Struyk, R. (2000). Homeownership and housing finance policy in the former Soviet bloc - costly populism. Research Report, Urban Institute.
  103. Sýkora, J., & Špačková, P. (2022). Neighbourhood at the crossroads: Differentiation in residential change and gentrification in a postsocialist inner-city neighbourhood. Housing Studies, 37(5), 693–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1829562
  104. Tsenkova, S. (2009). Housing policy reforms in postsocialist Europe. Lost in transition. Physica-Verlag, A Springer Company.
  105. Turner, B., Tosics, I., & Turner, B. (1992). The reform of housing in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. Routledge.
  106. Vincze, E. (2015). Glocalization of neoliberalism in Romania through the reform of the state and entrepreneurial development. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Studia Europaea, 60(1), 125–152.
  107. Vincze, E. (2017). The ideology of economic liberalism and the politics of housing in Romania. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Studia Europaea, 62(3), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2017.3.02
  108. Vincze, E. (2019). Three decades after. Advancing capitalism and the (re)production of Romania’s semi-peripherality. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia, 64(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2019-0013
  109. Vincze, E. (2020). Uneven EUfication, the spatial fix and the dominance of economic over social policies. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia, 65(2), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2020-0006
  110. Vincze, E., Harbula, H., Máthé, P., & Seprődi, A. (2019). Șantier în lucru pentru profit. Redezvoltare urbană în Cluj: Zona Ploiești-Someșului-Anton Pann-Abator-Parcul Feroviarilor. Desire.
  111. Vincze, E., & Zamfir, G. I. (2019). Racialized housing unevenness in Cluj-Napoca under capitalist redevelopment. City, 23(4-5), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2019.1684078
  112. Westkämper, E. (2014). Towards the reindustrialization of Europe: A concept for manufacturing for 2030. Springer.
  113. World Bank. (1993). Housing. Enabling markets to work. Stand Alone Books.
  114. World Bank. (2003). Word development report 2004. Retrieved June 15, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5468-X
  115. World Bank. (2005) Report No. 32452. Romania Country Assistance Evaluation. Country Evaluation and Regional Relations Operations Evaluation Department. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from
  116. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/173931468294053526/romania-country-assistance-evaluation
  117. Zamfir, G.I. (2021). Countering illegibility: a brief history of forced evictions in postsocialist Romania. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia, 1, 37-68. https://10.2478/subbs-2022-0002
  118. Zamfirescu, I., & Chelcea, L. (2021). Evictions as infrastructural events. Urban Geography, 42(9), 1270–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1778281
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2023-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2066-0464 | Journal ISSN: 1224-8703
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 73
Submitted on: May 1, 2023
Accepted on: Aug 1, 2023
Published on: Nov 23, 2023
Published by: Babeș-Bolyai University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Enikő Vincze, published by Babeș-Bolyai University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.