Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Three Decades After. Advancing Capitalism and the (Re)Production of Romania’s Semi-Peripherality Cover

Three Decades After. Advancing Capitalism and the (Re)Production of Romania’s Semi-Peripherality

By: Enikő Vincze  
Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. Arfire R. (2011). The Moral Regulation of the Second Europe: Transition, Europeanization and the Romanians. Critical Sociology, 37(6): 853–870.10.1177/0896920510398017
  2. Ban C. (2014). Dependenţă și dezvoltare. Economia politică a capitalismului românesc. Cluj: Tact.
  3. Behr H. (2007). The European Union in the legacies of imperial rule? EU accession politics viewed from a historical comparative perspective. European Journal of International Relations, 13(2): 240-291.10.1177/1354066107076956
  4. Behr H. and Stivachtis Y.A. (Eds.), (2016). Revisiting the European Union as Empire. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315745411
  5. Blackburn R. (2010). The Making of New World Slavery. London: Verso.
  6. Böröcz J. and Kovács M. (Eds.), (2001). Empires New Clothes. Unveiling EU Enlargement. Central Europe Review.
  7. Brewer A. (1980). Marxist theories of imperialism: a critical survey. Routledge.
  8. Büdenbender M and Aalbers MB (2019). How subordinate financialization shapes urban development: The rise and fall of Warsaw’s Służewiec business district. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(4): 666-684.10.1111/1468-2427.12791
  9. Commission of the European Communities (2004). Regular Report on Romania’s Progress Towards Accession.
  10. European Commission (1999). Agenda 2000 - Commission Opinion on Romania’s Application for Membership of the European Union.
  11. European Commission (2016). Europe in 12 lessons.
  12. European Council Presidency (1993). Official positions of the other Institutions and Organs - European Council. Presidency Conclusions. Copenhagen. 21-22 June.
  13. European Council Presidency (1995). Official positions of the other Institutions and Organs - European Council. Presidency Conclusions. Madrid. 15-16 December.
  14. Foster R. (2013). Tabula Imperii Europae: A Cartographic Approach to the Current Debate on the European Union as Empire. Geopolitics, 18: 371–402.10.1080/14650045.2012.716466
  15. Fraser N. (2016). Expropriation and Exploitation in Racialized Capitalism. A Reply to Michael Dawson. Critical Historical Studies, Spring: 163-179.10.1086/685814
  16. Global Property Guide (2018). https://www.globalpropertyguide.com/Europe/Romania. (Accessed 20 May 2019).
  17. Harvey D. (1982). The limits to capital. Basil Blackwell. Oxford.
  18. Harvey D. (2005). Spaces of neoliberalization: towards a theory of uneven geographical development. F.S. Verlag.
  19. Harvey D. (2006). Spaces of Global Capitalism: A Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. London: Verso.
  20. Horvath J. (2009). The IMF and Romania: A Road Well Travelled. Heise Online, 18 April. http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/30/30129/1.html. (Accessed on 24 January 2018).
  21. İçener E. (2009). Understanding Romania and Turkey’s Integration with the European Union: Conditionality, Security Considerations, and Identity. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10 (2): 225-239.10.1080/15705850902899289
  22. International Monetary Fund (1999). Memorandum of the Government of Romania on Economic Policies. http://www.imf.org/external/np/loi/1999/072699.htm#memo. (Accessed on 24 January 2018).
  23. Lehndorff S. (Edt.), (2015). Divisive integration. The triumph of failed ideas in Europe – revisited. European Trade Union Institute.
  24. Romanian Central Bank (2018). Financial Stability Report. https://www.bnr.ro/PublicationDocuments.aspx?icid=19966. (Accessed on 10 November 2019).
  25. SAPRIN (Structural Adjustment Participatory Review International Network) (2002). The Policy roots of economic crises and poverty. A multi-country participatory assessment of Structural Adjustment.
  26. Seth S. (2012). Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction. Routledge.10.4324/9780203073025
  27. Schmidt I. (2018). Neoliberal capitalism and its crises in Europe: towards a Luxemburgian interpretation. New Formations 94: 100-120.10.3898/NEWF:94.07.2018
  28. Smith N. (2008). Uneven development: nature, capital, and the production of space. The University of Georgia Press. Third edition (Prior editions 1984, 1990).10.1353/book11443
  29. Stivachtis Y.A. (2018). The ‘Civilizing’ Empire: The European Union and the MENA Neighborhood. Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies, April: 91-106.10.30958/ajms.4.2.1
  30. Syndex Romania (2019). Situația salariaților din România - studiu anual.https://www.syndex.ro/situatia-salariatilor-din-romania-studiu-anual. (Accessed on 10 November 2019).
  31. Verdery K. and Sharad C. (2009). Thinking between the Posts: Postcolonialism, Postsocialism, and Ethnography after the Cold War. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 51 (1): 6-34.10.1017/S0010417509000024
  32. Vincze E. (2014). The racialization of Roma in the ‘new’ Europe and the political potential of Romani women. European Journal of Women’s Studies, (Special issue: The New Europe: 25 Years after the Fall of the Wall) 21: 435-442.10.1177/1350506814548963
  33. Vincze E. (2015). Glocalization of neoliberalism in Romania through the reform of the state and entrepreneurial development. Studia UBB Europaea, LX (1): 125-151.
  34. Zielonka J. (2006). Europe as Empire. The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199292213.001.0001
  35. Wolf E. (1982). Europe and people without history. University of California Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/subbs-2019-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2066-0464 | Journal ISSN: 1224-8703
Language: English
Page range: 141 - 164
Published on: Feb 17, 2020
Published by: Babeș-Bolyai University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Enikő Vincze, published by Babeș-Bolyai University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.