Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Gender Differences and Other Findings on the Cognitive Reflection Test Cover

Gender Differences and Other Findings on the Cognitive Reflection Test

Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. Auld, M. C., Sidhu, N. (2005) Schooling, cognitive ability and health, Health Economics, 14(10), 1019–103410.1002/hec.1050
  2. Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., Metz, E. (2015) Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)?, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 265–28410.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003
  3. Benbow, C. P., Stanley, J. C. (1980) Sex Differences in Mathematical Ability: Fact or Artifact? Science, 210(12 December), 1978–198010.1126/science.7434028
  4. Brañas-Garza, P., Kujal, P., & Lenkei, B. (2015). Cognitive Reflection Test: Whom, how, when. Working Paper.
  5. Campitelli, G., Gerrans, P. (2014) Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach, Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 434–4710.3758/s13421-013-0367-9
  6. Campitelli, G., Labollita, M. (2010) Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices, Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 5, No. 3, June 2010, pp. 182–19110.1017/S1930297500001066
  7. Cokely, E. T., Kelley, C. M. (2009) Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation, Judgment and Decision Making 4(1), 20–33.10.1017/S193029750000067X
  8. Evans, J., Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005) Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning, Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 382–38910.1080/13546780542000005
  9. Evans, J., Frankisch, K. (2009) In two minds: Dual processes and beyond, Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.001.0001
  10. Eysenck, H. J. (1979) The structure and measurement of intelligence, Springer-Verlag, New York10.1007/978-3-642-67075-6
  11. Frederick, S. (2005) Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–4210.1257/089533005775196732
  12. Gervais, W. M., Norenzayan, A. (2012) Reminders of secular authority reduce believers’ distrust of atheists, Psychological Science, 23(5), 483–9110.1177/0956797611429711
  13. Halpern, D. (2004) A cognitive-process taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 135–13910.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00292.x
  14. Hedges, L., Nowell, A. (1995) Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals, Science, 269(5220), 41–4510.1126/science.7604277
  15. Herrnstein, R. J., Murray, C. (1994) The bell curve: intelligence and class structure an American life, Free Press.
  16. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Lamon, S. J. (1990) Gender Differences in Mathematics Performance : A Meta-Analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–15510.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
  17. Jensen, A. (1980) Bias in Mental Testing, Free Press.10.1017/S0140525X00005161
  18. Juanchich, M., Dewberry, C., Sirota, M., & Narendran, S. (2016). Cognitive Reflection Predicts Real-Life Decision Outcomes, but Not Over and Above Personality and Decision-Making Styles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, (52-59).10.1002/bdm.1875
  19. Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York
  20. Kahneman, D., Frederick, S. (2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgmen, Heuristics of Intuitive Judgment: Extensions and Applications10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004
  21. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(3), 263–29110.2307/1914185
  22. Liberali, J. M., Reyna, V. F., Furlan, S., Stein, L. M., Pardo, S. T. (2011) Individual Differences in Numeracy and Cognitive Reflection, with Implications for Biases and Fallacies in Probability Judgment, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(4):361-38110.1002/bdm.752
  23. Lubinski, D., Humphreys, L. G. (1997) Incorporating general intelligence into epidemiology and the social sciences, Intelligence, 24(1), 159–20110.1016/S0160-2896(97)90016-7
  24. Marincas, D., David, O. A. (2013) Psycho-social Predictors of Baccalaureate Performance of Romanian Students: what Makes the Difference between Students who Fail and those who Succeed?, 14(2), 209
  25. Moro, R. (2009) On the nature of the conjunction fallacy, Synthese, 171(1), 1–2410.1007/s11229-008-9377-8
  26. Oechssler, J., Roider, A., Schmitz, P. W. (2009) Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 147–15210.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.018
  27. Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., Greene, J. D. (2012) Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment, Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163–17710.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x
  28. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J., Fugelsang, J. (2015) Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?, Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 341–34810.3758/s13428-015-0576-1
  29. Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., Fugelsang, J. A. (2012) Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief, Cognition, 123(3), 335–34610.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
  30. Popa, C. A., Bochiş, L. (2016) The influence of baccalaureate average score on academic achievement of undergraduates, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Psychologia-Paedagogia, 61 (1), 95-106
  31. Primi, C., Morsanyi, K., Chiesi, F., Donati, M. A., Hamilton, J. (2016) The Development and Testing of a New Version of the Cognitive Reflection Test Applying Item Response Theory (IRT), Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 453–46910.1002/bdm.1883
  32. Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D. (2011) Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 141(3), 423–810.1037/a0025391
  33. Sherman, J., Gawronski, B., Trope, Y. (2014) In two minds, Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind, ebook: The Guilford Press.
  34. Simonton, D. K. (1996) Genius: The natural history of creativity, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(4), 39510.1016/S0005-7967(96)90003-0
  35. Sloman, S. A. (1996) The empirical case for two systems of reasoning, Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–2210.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
  36. Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645-665-72610.1017/S0140525X00003435
  37. Toplak, M. E., Stanovich, K. E. (2002) The domain specificity and generality of disjunctive reasoning: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 197–20910.1037/0022-0663.94.1.197
  38. Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E. (2011) The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks, Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275–128910.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
  39. Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–16810.1080/13546783.2013.844729
  40. Travers, E., Rolison, J. J., Feeney, A. (2016) The time course of conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test, Cognition, 150, 109–11810.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.015
  41. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1983), Extension versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment, Psychological Review. 90 (4): 293–31510.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293
  42. Zhang, D. C., Highhouse, S., & Rada, T. B. (2016). Explaining sex differences on the Cognitive Reflection Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 425–427.10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.034
Language: English
Page range: 56 - 67
Published on: Mar 12, 2019
Published by: Babeș-Bolyai University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2019 Laura-Augustina Avram, published by Babeș-Bolyai University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.