References
- Boggel, Sandra. 2009. Metadiscourse in Middle English and Early Modern English religious texts: A corpus-based study. Peter Lang.
- Brinton, Laurel J. 2017. The evolution of pragmatic markers in English: Pathways of change. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/978131641601310.1017/9781316416013
- Brisard, Frank (ed.). 2002. Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/978311089980110.1515/9783110899801
- Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085
- Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18(2). 159–212. DOI: 10.1017/S004740450001346410.1017/S0047404500013464
- Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. G. Fischer.
- Busse, Ulrich. 2002. Linguistic variation in the Shakespeare corpus: Morpho-syntactic variability of second person pronouns. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.10610.1075/pbns.106
- Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö. 2000. Data in historical pragmatics: Spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(2). 175–199. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul
- Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.4210.1075/tsl.42
- Evans, G. Blakemore (gen. ed.). 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare (2nd edn.). Houghton Mifflin Company.
- Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. Santa Cruz lectures on deixis, 1971. Indiana University Linguistics Club. [Reprinted in Charles J. Fillmore. 1997. Lectures on deixis. CSLI Publications.]
- Fries, Udo. 1994. Text deixis in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, De Gruyter Mouton. 111–128. DOI: 10.1515/9783110879599.11110.1515/9783110879599.111
- Gernsbacher, Morton A. & Susanne Shroyer. 1989. The cataphoric use of the indefinite this in spoken narratives. Memory & Cognition 17(5). 536–540. DOI: 10.3758/bf0319707610.3758/BF03197076
- Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. Longman.
- Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edn.). Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771
- Hornblower, Simon & Antony Spawforth (gen. eds.). 2012. The Oxford classical dictionary (4th edn.). Oxford University Press.10.1093/acref/9780199545568.001.0001
- Huang, Yan. 2014. Pragmatics (2nd edn.). Oxford University Press.
- Kopytko, Roman. 1993. Polite discourse in Shakespeare’s English. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.
- Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051181331310.1017/CBO9780511813313
- Magnusson, Lynne. 1999. Shakespeare and social dialogue: Dramatic language and Elizabethan letters. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051148374510.1017/CBO9780511483745
- Magnusson, Lynne. 2001. Dialogue. In Sylvia Adamson, Lynette Hunter & Lynne Magnusson (eds.), Reading Shakespeare’s dramatic language: A guide, Methuen. 130–143.
- Morgan, Oliver. 2019. Turn-taking in Shakespeare. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198836353.001.0001
- Nagucka, Ruta. 2000. The spatial and temporal meanings of before in Middle English. In Irma Taavitsainen, Terttu Nevalainen, Päivi Pahta & Matti Rissanen (eds.), Placing Middle English in context, De Gruyter Mouton. 329–337. DOI: 10.1515/9783110869514.32910.1515/9783110869514.329
- Nakayasu, Minako. 2009. The pragmatics of modals in Shakespeare. Peter Lang.
- Nakayasu, Minako. 2014. Wilt thou be lord of all the world? Modals and persuasion in Shakespeare. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 49(1). 5–30. DOI: 10.2478/stap-2014-000110.2478/stap-2014-0001
- Nakayasu, Minako. 2015. Spatio-temporal systems in A treatise on the Astrolabe. In Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre & Javier Calle-Martín (eds.), Approaches to Middle English: Variation, contact and change, Peter Lang. 243–259.
- Nakayasu, Minako. 2017a. Spatio-temporal systems in Margaret Paston’s letters. In Jacek Fisiak, Magdalena Bator & Marta Sylwanowicz (eds.), Essays and studies in Middle English, Peter Lang. 121–140.
- Nakayasu, Minako. 2017b. Spatio-temporal systems in Paston letters. Studia Neophilologica 89s1. 75–89. DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2017.131702010.1080/00393274.2017.1317020
- Nakayasu, Minako. 2018. Spatio-temporal systems in Chaucer. In Peter Petré, Hubert Cuyckens Hubert & Frauke D’hoedt (eds.), Sociocultural dimensions of lexis and text in the history of English, John Benjamins. 125–150. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.343.06nak10.1075/cilt.343.06nak
- Nakayasu, Minako. 2019. Spatio-temporal systems in Chaucer’s language: A discourse-pragmatic analysis. Linguistics Beyond and Within 5(1). 120–134. DOI: 10.31743/lingbaw.538410.31743/lingbaw.5384
- Nevalainen, Terttu. 2002. Women’s writing as evidence for linguistic continuity and change in Early Modern English. In Richard Watts & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Alternative histories of English, Routledge. 191–209.
- Oakeshott-Taylor, John. 1984. Factuality, tense, intonation and perspective: Some thoughts on the semantics of ‘think’. Lingua 62(4). 289–317. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(84)90056-110.1016/0024-3841(84)90056-1
- Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051161184110.1017/CBO9780511611841
- Taavitsainen, Irma. 1999. Personality and styles of affect in the Canterbury Tales. In Geoffrey Lester (ed.), Chaucer in perspective: Middle English essays in honour of Norman Blake, Sheffield Academic Press. 218–234.
- Taavitsainen, Irma & Turo Hiltunen. 2012. Now as a text deictic feature in Late Medieval and Early Modern English medical writing. In Ulrich Busse & Axel Hübler (eds.), Investigations into the meta-communicative lexicon of English: A contribution to historical pragmatics, John Benjamins. 179–205. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.220.14taa10.1075/pbns.220.14taa
- Taavtisainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker. 2010. Trends and developments in historical pragmatics. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, De Gruyter Mouton. 3–30. DOI: 10.1515/9783110214284.1.310.1515/9783110214284.1.3
- Taavtisainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker. 2015. Twenty years of historical pragmatics: Origins, developments and changing thought styles. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1). 1–24. DOI: 10.1075/jhp.16.1.01taa10.1075/jhp.16.1.01taa
- Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1974. Explorations in linguistic elaboration: Language change, language acquisition and the genesis of spatio-temporal terms. In John M. Anderson & Charles Jones (eds.), Historical linguistics. Vol. 1: Syntax, morphology, internal and comparative reconstruction. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Edinburgh, 2nd–7th September 1973, North-Holland Publishing Company. 263–314.
- Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1978. On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language. Vol. 3: Word structure, Stanford University Press. 369–400.
- Walker, Terry. 2007. Thou and you in Early Modern English dialogues: Trials, depositions, and drama comedy. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.15810.1075/pbns.158
- Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.