References
- Arnovick, Leslie Catherine. 1999. Diachronic pragmatics: Seven case studies in English illocutionary development (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 68). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford, etc.: Oxford University Press.
- Boden, Stefanie. 2004. Persuasive dialogues in Shakespeare’s dramatic work. Jena: Friedrich- Schiller-Universität Jena dissertation. http://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-3108/Boden.pdf. (7 March 2014).
- Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18. 159-212.
- Busse, Ulrich. 2008. An inventory of directives in Shakespeare’s King Lear. In: Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), 85-114. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Cialdini, Robert B. 2009. Influence: Science and practice. 5th edn. Boston, MA, etc.: Pearson Education.
- Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries (Croom Helm Linguistics Series). London, Sydney & Dover, NH: Croom Helm.
- Culpeper, Jonathan & Dawn Archer. 2008. Requests and directness in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play texts, 1640-1760. In: Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), 45-84. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Evans, Gwyne Blakemore (general editor). 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd edn. Boston, MA & New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
- Fraser, Bruce. 1975. Hedged performatives. In: Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts, 187-210. San Diego, CA, etc.: Academic Press.
- Gilbert, Anthony. 1997. Techniques of persuasion in Julius Caesar and Othello. Neophilologus 61. 309-323.
- Jacobs, Andreas & Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. The historical perspective in pragmatics. In: Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35), 3-33. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Jucker, Andreas H. 1997. Persuasion by inference: Analysis of a party political broadcast. In: J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (eds.), Political linguistics (Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11), 121-137.
- Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.). 2008. Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.). 2010. Historical pragmatics (Handbooks of Pragmatics 8). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2013. English historical pragmatics (Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Kohnen, Thomas. 2004. Methodological problems in corpus-based historical pragmatics: The case of English directives. In: Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), Language and computers. Advances in corpus linguistics: Papers from the 23rd International Con ference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23), Göteborg 22-26 May 2002, 237-242. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
- Kohnen, Thomas. 2009. Historical corpus pragmatics: Focus on speech acts and texts. In: Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29) (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 68), 13-36. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.
- Kopytko, Roman. 1993. Polite discourse in Shakespeare’s English. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.
- Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.
- Nakayasu, Minako. 2009. The pragmatics of modals in Shakespeare (Polish Studies in English language and literature 30). Frankfurt am Main, etc.: Peter Lang.
- Nakayasu, Minako. 2013. Modals, speech acts and (im)politeness: Interactions in Shakespeare’s plays. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 48(4). 5-33.
- Oakeshott-Taylor, John. 1984. Factuality, tense, intonation and perspective: Some thoughts on the semantics of ‘think’. Lingua 62. 289-317.
- O’Keefe, Daniel J. 2002. Persuasion: Theory and research, 2nd edn. (Current Communication: An Advanced Text Series 2). Thousand Oaks, CA, London & New Delhi: Sage Publications.
- Pakkala-Weckström, Mari. 2001. Prudence and the power of persuasion: Language and maistrie in The tale of Melibee. The Chaucer Review 35. 399-412.
- Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and modality, 2nd edn. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.
- Salmi-Tolonen, Tarja. 2005. Persuasion in judicial argumentation: The opinions of the advocates general at the European Court of Justice. In: Helena Halmari & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 130), 59-101. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Searle, John Rogers. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.
- Simons, Herbert W. & Jean G. Jones. 2011. Persuasion in society, 2nd edn. New York & London: Routledge.
- Spevack, Marvin (ed.). 1968-1980. A complete and systematic concordance to the works of Shakespeare. 9 vols. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.
- Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54). Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.
- Taavitsainen, Irma. 2012. New perspectives, theories, and methods: Historical pragmatics. In: Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 2 (Handbooks for Linguistics and Communication Science, 34.2), 1457-1474. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
- Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1972. A history of English syntax: A transformational approach to the history of English sentence structure (The Transatlantic Series in Linguistics). New York: Holt, Reinehart and Winston.
- Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65. 31-55.
- Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 1505-1528. Vickers, Brian. 1983. ‘The power of persuasion’: Images of the orator, Elyot to Shakespeare. In: James J. Murphy (ed.), Renaissance eloquence: Studies and practice of renaissance rhetoric, 411-435. Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA & London: University of California Press.
- Walton, Douglas. 2007. Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion, and rhetoric. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.
- Yoshikawa, Fumiko. 2011. Mapping of rhetorical strategies related to persuasion in Middle English religious prose. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Middle English (ICOME 7), Ivan Franko National University, Lviv, Ukraine.