Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Qualitative Seismic Evaluation of the Existing UR Masonry Shear Walls – Reinforced Concrete Frames System Cover

Qualitative Seismic Evaluation of the Existing UR Masonry Shear Walls – Reinforced Concrete Frames System

By: Petru Mihai and  Ion Sococol  
Open Access
|Dec 2024

References

  1. Khattak, N., Derakhshan, H., Thambiratnam, D.P., Perera, N.J. (2022). Typological characterisation of vintage unreinforced masonry buildings of Queensland, Australia. Structures. 41, pp. 99-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.095.
  2. Khattak, N., Derakhshan, H., Ferreira, T.M., Perera, N.J., Thambiratnam, D.P. (2024). Seismic vulnerability assessment of pre-1945 unreinforced masonry buildings located in Queensland, Australia, using an index-based approach. Structures. 67, 106900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106900.
  3. Buonocunto, V., Acconcia, E., Parisi, F. (2023). Seismic fragility modelling of unreinforced masonry buildings in Campania region. Procedia Structural Integrity. 44, pp. 67-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.010.
  4. Yon, B. (2021). Identification of failure mechanisms in existing unreinforced masonry buildings in rural areas after April 4, 2019 earthquake in Turkey. Journal of Building Engineering. 43, 102586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102586.
  5. Cima, V., Tomei, V., Grande, E., Imbimbo, M. (2023). Fragility curves for residential unreinforced masonry buildings prone to out-of-plane mechanisms: the case of the historical center of Sora. Procedia Structural Integrity. 44, pp. 211-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.028.
  6. Kaya, A., Adanur, S., Bello, R. A., Genc, A. F., Okur, F. Y., Sunca, F., Gunaydin, M., Altunisik, A. C., Sevim, B. (2023). Post-earthquake damage assessments of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings by shake table test and numerical visualization. Engineering Failure Analysis. 143, 106858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106858.
  7. Shabani, A., Zucconi, M., Kazemian, D., Kioumarsi, M. (2023). Seismic fragility analysis of low-rise unreinforced masonry buildings subjected to near- and far-field ground motions. Results in Engineering. 18, 101221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101221.
  8. Zarzour, N., Avila, M. P. S., Mercerat, E. D., Lenti, L., Oggero, M. (2023). Behavior factor estimation for seismic design of unreinforced masonry buildings. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 19, e02483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02483.
  9. Mezzina, M., Sollazzo, A., Uva, G. (2023). Torsional response of unreinforced masonry buildings. Procedia Structural Integrity. 44, pp. 566-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.074.
  10. Bracchi, S., Rota, M., Penna, A. (2023). Comparison of refined and code-compliant modelling strategies for the seismic analysis of unreinforced masonry buildings. Procedia Structural Integrity. 44, pp. 442-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.058.
  11. Kayirga, O. M., Altun, F. (2021). Investigation of earthquake behavior of unreinforced masonry buildings having different opening sizes: Experimental studies and numerical simulation. Journal of Building Engineering. 40, 102666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102666.
  12. Guvernul României. (1997). Hotărârea nr. 766/1997 pentru aprobarea unor regulamente privind calitatea în construcții. Monitorul Oficial al României.
  13. Ministerul Dezvoltării Regionale și Administrației Publice (MDRAP). (2013). Cod de proiectare seismică – Partea I – Prevederi de proiectare pentru clădiri. Indicativ P100-1/2013. Romania.
  14. Besen, P., Boarin, P. (2023). Integrating energy retrofit with seismic upgrades to future-proof built heritage: Case studies of unreinforced masonry buildings in Aotearoa New Zealand. Building and Environment. 241, 110512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110512.
  15. Ministerul Dezvoltării Regionale și Administrației Publice (MDRAP). (2013). Cod de proiectare seismică – Partea a III-a – Prevederi pentru evaluarea seismică a clădirilor existente. Indicativ P100-3/2019. Romania.
  16. Ministerul Dezvoltării Regionale și Turismului (MDRT). (2012). Cod de proiectare. Evaluarea acțiunii zăpezii asupra construcțiilor. Indicativ CR 1-1-3/2012. Romania.
  17. Ministerul Dezvoltării Regionale și Turismului (MDRT). (2012). Cod de proiectare. Evaluarea acțiunii vântului asupra construcțiilor. Indicativ CR 1-1-4/2012. Romania.
  18. Institutul Român de Standardizare (IRS). (1977). Adâncimi maxime de îngheț. Indicativ STAS 6054-77. Romania.
  19. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2006). Techniques for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings: FEMA 547. U.S., Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
  20. SIMPSON Strong-Tie Company. (2024). https://www.strongtie.com/solutions/unreinforced-masonry-seismic-retrofit/out-of-plane-wall-bracing>. Date of access: 24.09.2024
  21. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and the Earthquake Commission. (2017). Unreinforced Masonry Buildings. Part C – Detailed Seismic Assessment. C8 – Part C. New Zealand.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sspjce-2024-0014 | Journal eISSN: 1338-7278 | Journal ISSN: 1336-9024
Language: English
Published on: Dec 31, 2024
Published by: Technical University of Košice
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Petru Mihai, Ion Sococol, published by Technical University of Košice
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.