Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Material Selection of High Energy Performance Residential Building Cover

Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Material Selection of High Energy Performance Residential Building

Selected Scientific Papers - Journal of Civil Engineering
Volume 8 (2013): Issue 2 (November 2013)
By: Monika Čuláková,  Silvia Vilčeková,  Jana Katunská and  Eva Krídlová Burdová  
Open Access
|Nov 2013

References

  1. [1] Cordero, R.R., Roth, H P., & Da Silva, L. (2005). Economic growth or environmental protection? Environmental Science and Policy. Volume 8, 392-398.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Akadiri, O.P. (2011). ICT Development of a multi-criteria approach for the selection ofsustainable materials for building projects. PhD Thesis (437).
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Li, D.Z. et al. (2013). A methodology for estimating the life-cycle carbon efficiency of a residential building. Building and Environment. Volume 59, 448-455.10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.012
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Wadel, G. (2009). Sustainability in industrialized architecture: Modular lightweightconstruction applied to housing. PhD Thesis. Polytechnic University of Catalonia-Department of Architectural Constructions.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Economidou, M. et al. (2011). Europe's buildings under the microscope. Buildings Performance Institute Europe (132).
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Balaras, A. et al. (2007). European residential buildings and empirical assessment of the Hellenic building stock, energy consumption, emissions and potential energy savings. Buildingand Environment. Volume 42 (3), 1298-1314.10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Paleri, M., Lavagna, M. & Campioli, A. (2012). Life cycle assessment of a zero energy residential building. In BSA, 23.-25. May 2012, Porto, Portugal, 641-650.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Dimoudia, A. & Tompa, C. (2008). Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Volume 53 (2), 86-95.10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.09.008
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Huberman, N. & Pearlmutter, D. (2008). A life cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert. Energy and Buildings. Volume 40, 837-848.10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.06.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Nässén, J. et al. (2007). Direct and indirect energy use and carbon emissions in the production phase of buildings: An input-output analysis. Energy. Volume 32 (9), 1593-1602.10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Monahan, J. & Powell, J.C.(2011). An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study using a lifecycle assessment framework. Energy and Buildings. Volume 43 (1), 179-188.10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.09.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Rossi, B., Marique, A.F. & Reiter,S.(2012). Life-cycle assessment of residential buildings in three different European locations, case study. Building and Environment. Volume 51, 402-407.10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Gustavsson, L. & Joelsson, A. (2010). Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings. Energy and Buildings. Volume 42 (2), 210-220.10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.017
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Bribián, I.Z., Uséon, A.A. & Scarpellini, S. (2009). Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-ofthe- art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Buildingand Environment. Volume 44, 2510-2520.10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Hammond, G. & Jones, C. (2010). Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Energy. Volume 161, 87-98.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Gustavsson, L., Joelsson, A. & Sathre, R. (2010). Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building. Energy and Buildings. Volume 42, 230-242.10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.018
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Stephan, R.H., Crawford, K. & de Myttenaere, K. (2011).Towards a more holistic approach to reducing the energy demand of dwellings. Procedia Engineering. Volume 21, 1033-1041.10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2109
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Citherlet, S. & Defaux, T. (2007) Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a family house during its whole life span. Building and Environment. Volume 42 (2), 591-598.10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.025
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Asif, M., Muneer, T. & Kelley, R. (2007). Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland. Building and Environment. Volume 42 (3), 1391-1394.10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.023
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Hacker, J., et al. (2008). Embodied and operational carbon dioxide emissions from housing: a case study on the effects of thermal mass and climate change. Energy and Buildings. Volume 40 (3), 375-384.10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.03.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Thormark, C. (2006). The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building. Building and Environment. Volume 41, 1019-1026.10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.026
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Vonka, M. (2006). Life cycle assessment of buildings. PhD thesis. ČVUT, Prague, http://www.vonka.wz.cz/publikace/Vonka_dizertace_teze.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Bribián, I.Z, Capilla, A.V. & Usón, A.A. (2011). Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Building and Environment. Volume 46 (5), 1133-1140.10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Dodoo, A., Gustavsson, L. & Sathre, R. (2009). Carbon implications of end-of-life management of building materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Volume 53,276-286.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] De Benedetto L. & Klemeš J. (2009). The Environmental Performance Strategy Map: an integrated LCA approach to support the strategic decision-making process. Journal of CleanerProduction. Volume 17, 900-906.10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.02.012
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Waltjen, T. (2009) Passivhaus-Bauteilkatalog, Ökologisch bewertete Konstruktionen. Wien, Austria, Springer (347).
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] OI3-indicator: Leitfaden zur Berechnung von Ökokennzahlen für Gebäude. (2011). http://www.ibo.at/documents/OI3_Berechnungsleitfaden_V3.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] Hejhálek, J. (2001). Thermal storage and inertia of wood houses. Architecture and Interior 2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] Wang J.J., et al. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Volume 13 (9), 2263-2278.10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] Korviny, P. Theoretical basis of multi-criteria decision. (2009). PhD Thesis, Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sspjce-2013-0023 | Journal eISSN: 1338-7278 | Journal ISSN: 1336-9024
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 103 - 114
Published on: Nov 9, 2013
Published by: Technical University of Košice
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
material selection,
energy effective building structures,
embodied environmental impacts,
multicriteria analysis
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2013 Monika Čuláková, Silvia Vilčeková, Jana Katunská, Eva Krídlová Burdová, published by Technical University of Košice
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 8 (2013): Issue 2 (November 2013)Next article